Also, muslims and jews also put down "white" on their voting registrations and other government forms. Some forms have no category for hispanic, so all the illegal aliens are classified as "white" in those cases.
There has been a trend among Middle Easterners in the United States, such as ethnic Persians from Iran and such, who want to get in on the diversity gravy train and who want to be considered a minority, but not lumped into "Asians" which would mean they would get the shaft like Whites and other Asians when it comes to things like college applications. They are lobbying the feds for new categories. Heck, "Hispanic" wasn't even a category until the 1970s.
When at one time it was advantageous to pretend to be white, they'd pretend to be white.
The fact that government collects racial profile demographic information on the people is itself a racist action with intentions to discriminate upon race.
A true civil rights act would remove such racial discrimination and ban the government from being allowed to even know anyone's race at all or store any database or racial information on the citizenry.
But you'll never find a dipshit DemoKKKrat or Republican that will admit to this because they're all racist frauds pretending otherwise.
I generally agree. I can see racial data being of use in a couple places, a census (so a white majority can tell how to restrict future immigration) and photo IDs. But why the fuck does a voter ID card, a useless piece of paper if ever there was one, require race on it?
VOTE, noun [Latin votum, voveo, to vow.] - "suffrage; the expression of a wish, desire, will, in regard to any measure proposed"
Before one can vote upon proposed (suggested), one responds to imposed (perceivable)...
reason.com
a) REASON always implies a conflict (agreement vs disagreement) over suggested information...if consented to.
b) consenting to suggested implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, hence COM, from COMMERCIAL (as the top level domain for the internal network).
Now she's campaigning as minority.
Also, muslims and jews also put down "white" on their voting registrations and other government forms. Some forms have no category for hispanic, so all the illegal aliens are classified as "white" in those cases.
There has been a trend among Middle Easterners in the United States, such as ethnic Persians from Iran and such, who want to get in on the diversity gravy train and who want to be considered a minority, but not lumped into "Asians" which would mean they would get the shaft like Whites and other Asians when it comes to things like college applications. They are lobbying the feds for new categories. Heck, "Hispanic" wasn't even a category until the 1970s.
When at one time it was advantageous to pretend to be white, they'd pretend to be white.
Elizabeth Warren proved how advantageous it was to NOT be white and be a fake indian instead.
That's why I tell people my last name is Katz. ___ Chairman Meow CCCP
That’s gotta be the least controversial thing she’s done
White appropriation over here.
She joined her family's clothing business before serving as treasurer and president of the National Association of Women Business Owners.
Wow, what a resume ! Probably no agenda, right?
This is another form of GROOMING....isn't it?
The fact that government collects racial profile demographic information on the people is itself a racist action with intentions to discriminate upon race.
A true civil rights act would remove such racial discrimination and ban the government from being allowed to even know anyone's race at all or store any database or racial information on the citizenry.
But you'll never find a dipshit DemoKKKrat or Republican that will admit to this because they're all racist frauds pretending otherwise.
I generally agree. I can see racial data being of use in a couple places, a census (so a white majority can tell how to restrict future immigration) and photo IDs. But why the fuck does a voter ID card, a useless piece of paper if ever there was one, require race on it?
Before one can vote upon proposed (suggested), one responds to imposed (perceivable)...
a) REASON always implies a conflict (agreement vs disagreement) over suggested information...if consented to.
b) consenting to suggested implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, hence COM, from COMMERCIAL (as the top level domain for the internal network).