Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

10
()
posted 2 years ago by pkvi 2 years ago by pkvi +12 / -2
12 comments share
12 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (12)
sorted by:
▲ 0 ▼
– TallestSkil 0 points 2 years ago +2 / -2

We would see the trail as they reenter the atmosphere. Someone would have video of it. It’s far more likely that none of these actually exist–never mind as foreign threats–and are only hoaxes to grant casus belli for war with China in 2024 (like that Air Force general openly said already).

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– brahbruh 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Grant occasion for war for war?

This reminds me of when common folks learned of the word 'whence', and everyone started saying "from whence". Another example is folks forming sentences like, "John and I were driving to the park.", etc.

Speak using grammar and vocabulary that you understand; it's easier to read and to write.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TallestSkil 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Uh huh, I do. Run along now, kiddo. I’m not going to play your dialectical game. I know how it ends on the other side.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– brahbruh 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

When I first saw you start popping into the forum I thought, "good, another cynic", but I've seen your commentary deteriorate from general cynicism to pure fatalism, finally to the point of just telling everyone to commit suicide. I don't know if you're projecting because you have something negative going on and this is an outlet for you, or if you were just that cynical (which is perfectly OK, IMHO, if so).

The reason I made that pedantic response is to make you aware that you, despite not being constantly trolled by others, can also be judged, by conscious beings who read your comments. Without some kind of pushback, users who are unduly abrasive can otherwise exist in a different universe, wherein they are free to pretend they are omniscient super-humans.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– TallestSkil 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

just telling everyone to commit suicide.

No, just confirmed paid shills.

you, despite not being constantly trolled by others, can also be judged, by conscious beings who read your comments

That’s fine. I’d love to engage in more human discussion. I’d love to feel as though it was worth it to take the time to do so. When identical proven falsehoods are spammed every single day, there’s absolutely no justification in taking the time to provide citations and sources (and format them for this website specifically), to articulate arguments, to weigh options, and to expose falsehoods and help people understand how a coverup works and how to look at the world around it, rather than at it.

But why should anyone do that when the same proven lies are allowed to be posted every single day? Why should anyone waste his time when shills demand their lies be disproven every day, and then post them again the next day pretending they’ve never been addressed?

It’s all they deserve.

users who are unduly abrasive can otherwise exist in a different universe, wherein they are free to pretend they are omniscient super-humans.

Thing is, I’m a worthless piece of shit. So when someone’s behaving as though they’re stupider even than me, I have neither time nor tolerance for that shit. I’m not going to let it fly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– brahbruh 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Technically, I agree with everything you just said (assuming the same actors are posting the same stuff every day). My only beef is with making the assumption that everybody who disagrees on a topic is acting in bad faith, or assuming that the "science is settled" on a topic. The whole "you're a shill" stuff has been one of the biggest form sliding activities I've seen over the years. I saw it impact Voat, badly, at times.

Pertaining the stuff you're talking about (flat earth), I personally believe the Earth is a globe in space, but I believe a lot of these "flat earth" videos have serious evidence of a massive deception that is going on (esp pertaining NASA, etc.), and I feel like the FE crowd are the only people paying any attention to that stuff, so I have a hard time with the notion that most of these people are acting in bad faith.

Disclaimer: I don't go to the "new" tab, so it's quite possible I'm missing a lot of the spam you guys are talking about, so the difference between our viewpoints may just be ignorance of certain bad actors on my part.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TallestSkil 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

My only beef is with making the assumption that everybody who disagrees on a topic is acting in bad faith

Fair enough, which is why having a list of repeat offenders is necessary to separate the wheat from the chaff. It’s annoying as fuck, because we shouldn’t have to live like this, but in the endlessly ephemeral nature of the Internet, it’s somewhat necessary.

I feel like the FE crowd are the only people paying any attention to that stuff, so I have a hard time with the notion that most of these people are acting in bad faith.

If they cared about “a massive deception,” they would, instead, talk about said deception rather than:

  1. talking about a proven falsehood that a 3rd grader can independently verify
  2. poisoning the well by associating said “real” deception with the aforementioned proven falsehood.

That’s the rub.

Disclaimer: I don't go to the "new" tab, so it's quite possible I'm missing a lot of the spam you guys are talking about

Wow, that might be it. I’m always using New.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– brahbruh 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

That actually may be the difference between my viewpoint and all of you guys, part of it is that I just come here on my phone, so I don't ever see the full website experience. I just log in and go to the homepage, which defaults to "hot".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 0 ▼
– TallestSkil 0 points 2 years ago +2 / -2

Fair point, but the satellite in question was in MEO, so it’s unlikely that any debris will be coming down any time soon anyway.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– CrazyRussian 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

If rumors about 2499 is true, it was a satellite built to intercept and destroy other satellites.

So, it is possible that it even was not Cosmos-2499 that break into pieces. Really we would have some glue if some other satellite will break into pieces suddenly. Meanwhile, NORAD can't really track maneuvering sats, it needs few passes on stable orbit to find out new sat orbit parameters. Who knows, may be we already have space war.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy