It's your title dude. You are claiming trump brought his child to be raped on a plane, when there is no evidence for that. It sensational editorializing.
We're talking Eric, not Barron. Changes the time line.
Imo, the pedo went worldwide planet takeover when Clinton left and granted Epstein. So Eric was there before this. Taken at a time...during their "build up" period. During the trump will be prez period? Who knows, but the boy has seen shit.
Names on a flightlist is not proof of visitation of the island.
quote: 'The Trumps flew with Epstein and Maxwell aboard a Grumman Gulfstream II private jet from Palm Beach, Florida, to Teterboro Airport in New Jersey.'
Trump has operations in New Jersey.
The island no doubt had it's own set of records of visitation. Sub, boat or heli would be the choices. This was all investigated as part of Florida trial.
Schmoozers will schmooze in attempts to recruit or curry favors.
btw: Pictures now show George 'Santos' as having visited Maralago, my guess being schmoozing, boozing and attempts to snoop any intel he could, much like his hovering around Gaetz and Boebart during Biden's speech.
Epstein and Maxwell were known for abusing GIRLS, not boys. And exclusively exploited the poor, and not anyone who would retaliate against them, such as Trump.
on both occasions they were newly discovered photos of seeming significance because of the location and or the people in them. The article you posted is also a new discovery of significance. It's just your title, like I said. And there is more than just trump in those logs that could be of significance.
"Similar" is a rather vague term, don't you think? And the future is not something to makes promises on lightly. Now I can't speak for u/clemaneuverers , but I can say that I personally found the title objectionable. Namely your need for us to use our imaginations to visualize rape scenarios of young boys, with no clear motives or actual evidence, in an attempt to disparage someone you clearly do not like.
With that in mind. I highly discourage anyone from making any promises to the likes of you. As you do not seem to have very high ethical standards. After all, you are the one that wrote that title, and seem to have no problem doing so in the first place.
What even motivates this Question:
So, are you going to object to all similar titles in the future?
Suggestion tempts implication (if/then) to mislead perception...if one consents to suggested over perceivable.
TI'TLE, noun [Latin titulust.] - "an inscription put over any thing as a name by which it is known" aka an inscription (suggested information) over what is known (perceivable inspiration).
It's your title dude. You are claiming trump brought his child to be raped on a plane, when there is no evidence for that. It sensational editorializing.
lol, you are very, very selective about what you deem "sensational editorializing."
First, I never claimed that Barron was raped in that flight, why do you claim that I did?
Second, look forward to you objecting to every thread title that makes claims without providig evidence.
You will do that, right? You don't want to look like a hypocrite, correct?
Thanks for admitting you made a claim without evidence. I do indeed object to such things when I see them, as I did in this thread.
We shall see. I have a hunch that you won't.
We're talking Eric, not Barron. Changes the time line.
Imo, the pedo went worldwide planet takeover when Clinton left and granted Epstein. So Eric was there before this. Taken at a time...during their "build up" period. During the trump will be prez period? Who knows, but the boy has seen shit.
Names on a flightlist is not proof of visitation of the island.
quote: 'The Trumps flew with Epstein and Maxwell aboard a Grumman Gulfstream II private jet from Palm Beach, Florida, to Teterboro Airport in New Jersey.'
Trump has operations in New Jersey.
The island no doubt had it's own set of records of visitation. Sub, boat or heli would be the choices. This was all investigated as part of Florida trial.
Schmoozers will schmooze in attempts to recruit or curry favors.
btw: Pictures now show George 'Santos' as having visited Maralago, my guess being schmoozing, boozing and attempts to snoop any intel he could, much like his hovering around Gaetz and Boebart during Biden's speech.
Lots of people own planes bud.
The issue here is who's plane it was.
You should go ahead and Google the name "Jeffrey Epstein."
I know all the issues, but thanks.
Glad that we have established that. For years, Qultists, pizzagaters, and other vermin have been telling me the opposite.
Shuddering stopped.
The movie continues.
The horror of being given a private jet flight to your destination. Someone must pay for this crime.
You think that Epstein and Maxwell are appropriate travel company for a child?
Epstein and Maxwell were known for abusing GIRLS, not boys. And exclusively exploited the poor, and not anyone who would retaliate against them, such as Trump.
So that makes it perfectly fine that Trump took his son to travel with these sickos.
What's wrong with you?
What's wrong with me? Well you see, I just want the frim fram sauce with the Ausen fay, with chafafa on the side!
Oh, and I think that you are full of shit!
https://conspiracies.win/p/140cNYZ06R/the-epstein-and-maxwell-cabin-ph/c/
https://conspiracies.win/p/15JAOFjGYm/whitney-webb-who-rediscovered-th/c/
Funny that when it was about Clinton and other people, you seemed to think that a connection with Epstein was notable.
What makes this one harmless?
I made no misleading claims in either title.
Never said you did but why post it when you have no evidence of wrongdoing at hese occasions?
on both occasions they were newly discovered photos of seeming significance because of the location and or the people in them. The article you posted is also a new discovery of significance. It's just your title, like I said. And there is more than just trump in those logs that could be of significance.
So, are you going to object to all similar titles in the future?
"Similar" is a rather vague term, don't you think? And the future is not something to makes promises on lightly. Now I can't speak for u/clemaneuverers , but I can say that I personally found the title objectionable. Namely your need for us to use our imaginations to visualize rape scenarios of young boys, with no clear motives or actual evidence, in an attempt to disparage someone you clearly do not like.
With that in mind. I highly discourage anyone from making any promises to the likes of you. As you do not seem to have very high ethical standards. After all, you are the one that wrote that title, and seem to have no problem doing so in the first place.
What even motivates this Question:
Do tell us. Please.
This must be the first time that you object to a post about possible child abuse.
I'm sure it has nothing to do with the Trump connection.
Suggestion tempts implication (if/then) to mislead perception...if one consents to suggested over perceivable.
TI'TLE, noun [Latin titulust.] - "an inscription put over any thing as a name by which it is known" aka an inscription (suggested information) over what is known (perceivable inspiration).
OH, but O.P implied that we are to imagine something horrible happened. So, do that, and then assume that is in fact what did happen.
Then be like "Oh no! How terrible!"
https://conspiracies.win/p/140c09XDrY/as-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-opens/c/
Comment?
It is truly amazing how you guys suddenly see nothing wrong with Epstein and Maxwell.
I wonder why that is.
Is that how your world works? If you think it, and then type it, it becomes fact?
I wonder why that is.
Well, you tell me. You made a big deal out of Esptein's flights in the past.
If you didn't think something was wrong with them, why did you post about them?
What you just said, is just vague enough to, yes entirely!