on both occasions they were newly discovered photos of seeming significance because of the location and or the people in them. The article you posted is also a new discovery of significance. It's just your title, like I said. And there is more than just trump in those logs that could be of significance.
"Similar" is a rather vague term, don't you think? And the future is not something to makes promises on lightly. Now I can't speak for u/clemaneuverers , but I can say that I personally found the title objectionable. Namely your need for us to use our imaginations to visualize rape scenarios of young boys, with no clear motives or actual evidence, in an attempt to disparage someone you clearly do not like.
With that in mind. I highly discourage anyone from making any promises to the likes of you. As you do not seem to have very high ethical standards. After all, you are the one that wrote that title, and seem to have no problem doing so in the first place.
What even motivates this Question:
So, are you going to object to all similar titles in the future?
Never said you did but why post it when you have no evidence of wrongdoing at hese occasions?
on both occasions they were newly discovered photos of seeming significance because of the location and or the people in them. The article you posted is also a new discovery of significance. It's just your title, like I said. And there is more than just trump in those logs that could be of significance.
So, are you going to object to all similar titles in the future?
"Similar" is a rather vague term, don't you think? And the future is not something to makes promises on lightly. Now I can't speak for u/clemaneuverers , but I can say that I personally found the title objectionable. Namely your need for us to use our imaginations to visualize rape scenarios of young boys, with no clear motives or actual evidence, in an attempt to disparage someone you clearly do not like.
With that in mind. I highly discourage anyone from making any promises to the likes of you. As you do not seem to have very high ethical standards. After all, you are the one that wrote that title, and seem to have no problem doing so in the first place.
What even motivates this Question:
Do tell us. Please.
This must be the first time that you object to a post about possible child abuse.
I'm sure it has nothing to do with the Trump connection.