on both occasions they were newly discovered photos of seeming significance because of the location and or the people in them. The article you posted is also a new discovery of significance. It's just your title, like I said. And there is more than just trump in those logs that could be of significance.
Suggestion tempts implication (if/then) to mislead perception...if one consents to suggested over perceivable.
TI'TLE, noun [Latin titulust.] - "an inscription put over any thing as a name by which it is known" aka an inscription (suggested information) over what is known (perceivable inspiration).
https://conspiracies.win/p/140cNYZ06R/the-epstein-and-maxwell-cabin-ph/c/
https://conspiracies.win/p/15JAOFjGYm/whitney-webb-who-rediscovered-th/c/
Funny that when it was about Clinton and other people, you seemed to think that a connection with Epstein was notable.
What makes this one harmless?
I made no misleading claims in either title.
Never said you did but why post it when you have no evidence of wrongdoing at hese occasions?
on both occasions they were newly discovered photos of seeming significance because of the location and or the people in them. The article you posted is also a new discovery of significance. It's just your title, like I said. And there is more than just trump in those logs that could be of significance.
So, are you going to object to all similar titles in the future?
Suggestion tempts implication (if/then) to mislead perception...if one consents to suggested over perceivable.
TI'TLE, noun [Latin titulust.] - "an inscription put over any thing as a name by which it is known" aka an inscription (suggested information) over what is known (perceivable inspiration).