There are no carbon nanotubes in the body. There is no graphene in the body. You don’t have a fucking clue what a quantum dot even is. Hydrogel swimmers are a mathematical model. Plasmonic nanoantennae have nothing even remotely like the bandwidth or range you think they do. Microscopic constructs of individual molecules cannot have a MAC address. Oh, and perhaps most importantly,
There’s not a single paper published anywhere in the fucking world which shows even one the steps required to so much as pretend to use a system like this in order to elicit even a single, random neuronal command in any living tissue.
Go back to the flat earth spam. At least that’s something where you’re not actively covering up anything.
Thanks for confirming everything I said. The existence of black projects does not imply the veracity of literally any claim made by anyone, anywhere, at any time, for any reason. The buzzwords in the graphic above are all real concepts, none of which have been even individually implemented in real-world scenarios. Most are simply mathematical models. None of which CAN be implemented in the assembly presented at the end of the image, because the laws of physics prevent their operation in this way.
And that’s without even bringing up the overarching premise of the image, which is “mass mind control through artificial neuronal impulses”–a complete psychosis that implies a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more.
And that’s without even bringing up the overarching premise of the image, which is “mass mind control through artificial neuronal impulses”–a complete psychosis that implies a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more.
And that’s without even bringing up the overarching premise of the image, which is “mass mind control through artificial neuronal impulses”–a complete psychosis that implies a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more.
That are basing on open-source-available informations you have. You are assuming openly available technology is most advanced one available XD
None of which CAN be implemented in the assembly presented at the end of the image, because the laws of physics prevent their operation in this way.
Oh,which ones ?
a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more
No more than 50 years, actually I guess rather 30 max if we are talking about "available science" not being kept secret.
For maintaining control with paralysing of victims/killing or neuromodulation even less/probably even applicable now.
Maybe I have no direct degree in biotech or nanoscience,but nevertheless my studies were near it and I did some learning just for myself. Reports from implementation wouldn't be available for obvious reasons, most of this is basing on known technologies. Most complicated is controlling self-assembly without unwanted side effects. Of course it would require much more personel but with proper data extraction tools workforce could be reduced.
That are basing on open-source-available informations you have. You are assuming openly available technology is most advanced one available
Then it’s on you to prove otherwise. I’m waiting.
Oh,which ones ?
I… don’t think the question fits the context.
No more than 50 years, actually I guess rather 30 max if we are talking about "available science" not being kept secret.
Okay, that’s debatable. It’s hard to give a future timeframe on things we don’t know we don’t know, but going off of what we’ve (failed) to learn for, say, the last half century, I’m not optimistic about the biosciences.
For maintaining control with paralysing of victims/killing or neuromodulation even less/probably even applicable now.
Any evidence of that?
Most complicated is controlling self-assembly without unwanted side effects.
Exactly. I mean, if you think standard chip manufacturing has a lot of rejected dies, hoo-wee, there’s going to be an order of magnitude more rejects if we’re talking nano-scale constructs like this.
There are no carbon nanotubes in the body. There is no graphene in the body. You don’t have a fucking clue what a quantum dot even is. Hydrogel swimmers are a mathematical model. Plasmonic nanoantennae have nothing even remotely like the bandwidth or range you think they do. Microscopic constructs of individual molecules cannot have a MAC address. Oh, and perhaps most importantly,
There’s not a single paper published anywhere in the fucking world which shows even one the steps required to so much as pretend to use a system like this in order to elicit even a single, random neuronal command in any living tissue.
Go back to the flat earth spam. At least that’s something where you’re not actively covering up anything.
If you are not shill then you are idiot. Black projects.
Thanks for confirming everything I said. The existence of black projects does not imply the veracity of literally any claim made by anyone, anywhere, at any time, for any reason. The buzzwords in the graphic above are all real concepts, none of which have been even individually implemented in real-world scenarios. Most are simply mathematical models. None of which CAN be implemented in the assembly presented at the end of the image, because the laws of physics prevent their operation in this way.
And that’s without even bringing up the overarching premise of the image, which is “mass mind control through artificial neuronal impulses”–a complete psychosis that implies a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more.
That are basing on open-source-available informations you have. You are assuming openly available technology is most advanced one available XD
Oh,which ones ?
No more than 50 years, actually I guess rather 30 max if we are talking about "available science" not being kept secret.
For maintaining control with paralysing of victims/killing or neuromodulation even less/probably even applicable now.
Maybe I have no direct degree in biotech or nanoscience,but nevertheless my studies were near it and I did some learning just for myself. Reports from implementation wouldn't be available for obvious reasons, most of this is basing on known technologies. Most complicated is controlling self-assembly without unwanted side effects. Of course it would require much more personel but with proper data extraction tools workforce could be reduced.
Then it’s on you to prove otherwise. I’m waiting.
I… don’t think the question fits the context.
Okay, that’s debatable. It’s hard to give a future timeframe on things we don’t know we don’t know, but going off of what we’ve (failed) to learn for, say, the last half century, I’m not optimistic about the biosciences.
Any evidence of that?
Exactly. I mean, if you think standard chip manufacturing has a lot of rejected dies, hoo-wee, there’s going to be an order of magnitude more rejects if we’re talking nano-scale constructs like this.