There are no carbon nanotubes in the body. There is no graphene in the body. You don’t have a fucking clue what a quantum dot even is. Hydrogel swimmers are a mathematical model. Plasmonic nanoantennae have nothing even remotely like the bandwidth or range you think they do. Microscopic constructs of individual molecules cannot have a MAC address. Oh, and perhaps most importantly,
There’s not a single paper published anywhere in the fucking world which shows even one the steps required to so much as pretend to use a system like this in order to elicit even a single, random neuronal command in any living tissue.
Go back to the flat earth spam. At least that’s something where you’re not actively covering up anything.
edit: TK deleted an inaccurate comment making claims about my posting FE spam and also sent a rather vitriolic PM with the heading "Template: Response:"
tallestshil is here to slide, spread FUD, and waste legit users' time. just checked it's history, and for all it's kvetching and shitting on other users' posts, it hasn't made a single post of it's own.
Thanks for confirming everything I said. The existence of black projects does not imply the veracity of literally any claim made by anyone, anywhere, at any time, for any reason. The buzzwords in the graphic above are all real concepts, none of which have been even individually implemented in real-world scenarios. Most are simply mathematical models. None of which CAN be implemented in the assembly presented at the end of the image, because the laws of physics prevent their operation in this way.
And that’s without even bringing up the overarching premise of the image, which is “mass mind control through artificial neuronal impulses”–a complete psychosis that implies a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more.
And that’s without even bringing up the overarching premise of the image, which is “mass mind control through artificial neuronal impulses”–a complete psychosis that implies a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more.
And that’s without even bringing up the overarching premise of the image, which is “mass mind control through artificial neuronal impulses”–a complete psychosis that implies a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more.
That are basing on open-source-available informations you have. You are assuming openly available technology is most advanced one available XD
None of which CAN be implemented in the assembly presented at the end of the image, because the laws of physics prevent their operation in this way.
Oh,which ones ?
a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more
No more than 50 years, actually I guess rather 30 max if we are talking about "available science" not being kept secret.
For maintaining control with paralysing of victims/killing or neuromodulation even less/probably even applicable now.
Maybe I have no direct degree in biotech or nanoscience,but nevertheless my studies were near it and I did some learning just for myself. Reports from implementation wouldn't be available for obvious reasons, most of this is basing on known technologies. Most complicated is controlling self-assembly without unwanted side effects. Of course it would require much more personel but with proper data extraction tools workforce could be reduced.
That are basing on open-source-available informations you have. You are assuming openly available technology is most advanced one available
Then it’s on you to prove otherwise. I’m waiting.
Oh,which ones ?
I… don’t think the question fits the context.
No more than 50 years, actually I guess rather 30 max if we are talking about "available science" not being kept secret.
Okay, that’s debatable. It’s hard to give a future timeframe on things we don’t know we don’t know, but going off of what we’ve (failed) to learn for, say, the last half century, I’m not optimistic about the biosciences.
For maintaining control with paralysing of victims/killing or neuromodulation even less/probably even applicable now.
Any evidence of that?
Most complicated is controlling self-assembly without unwanted side effects.
Exactly. I mean, if you think standard chip manufacturing has a lot of rejected dies, hoo-wee, there’s going to be an order of magnitude more rejects if we’re talking nano-scale constructs like this.
if his history hadn't already, this thread and the PM's made it pretty clear tallestpedo isn't motivated whatsoever by the spirit of honest inquiry. was just giving the fed POS more rope.
There are no carbon nanotubes in the body. There is no graphene in the body. You don’t have a fucking clue what a quantum dot even is. Hydrogel swimmers are a mathematical model. Plasmonic nanoantennae have nothing even remotely like the bandwidth or range you think they do. Microscopic constructs of individual molecules cannot have a MAC address. Oh, and perhaps most importantly,
There’s not a single paper published anywhere in the fucking world which shows even one the steps required to so much as pretend to use a system like this in order to elicit even a single, random neuronal command in any living tissue.
Go back to the flat earth spam. At least that’s something where you’re not actively covering up anything.
why did you delete your comment about my posting FE spam, and then send a PM that had "Template: Response:" as the header?
edit: that's 2 PM's now from TK with the heading "Template: Response:", the 2nd PM claiming the deleted comment isn't deleted.
4PM's... why aren't you commenting in thread where everyone can read? yet, your pm's call me a coward...
that's 3 PM's now, all with the same "Template: Response" heading. why not just comment in the thread?
edit: 3rd PM is making threats. this is acceptable behavior? mods?
nice FUD. one shekel has been deposited in your account.
if you were secure in your position, you wouldn't be making personal attacks. or inaccurate ones, as i've never made an FE post.
you linked a comment, not a post
edit: TK deleted an inaccurate comment making claims about my posting FE spam and also sent a rather vitriolic PM with the heading "Template: Response:"
why are you PM-ing me with templates rather than commenting publicly in this thread where everyone can read what you have to say?
Damn glow, you broke them.
the PM's are literally titled Template: Response
tallestshil is here to slide, spread FUD, and waste legit users' time. just checked it's history, and for all it's kvetching and shitting on other users' posts, it hasn't made a single post of it's own.
Yeah, TS and I have had a long conversation a couple days ago. He seems to be the site "guard dog" to me.
If you are not shill then you are idiot. Black projects.
Thanks for confirming everything I said. The existence of black projects does not imply the veracity of literally any claim made by anyone, anywhere, at any time, for any reason. The buzzwords in the graphic above are all real concepts, none of which have been even individually implemented in real-world scenarios. Most are simply mathematical models. None of which CAN be implemented in the assembly presented at the end of the image, because the laws of physics prevent their operation in this way.
And that’s without even bringing up the overarching premise of the image, which is “mass mind control through artificial neuronal impulses”–a complete psychosis that implies a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more.
That are basing on open-source-available informations you have. You are assuming openly available technology is most advanced one available XD
Oh,which ones ?
No more than 50 years, actually I guess rather 30 max if we are talking about "available science" not being kept secret.
For maintaining control with paralysing of victims/killing or neuromodulation even less/probably even applicable now.
Maybe I have no direct degree in biotech or nanoscience,but nevertheless my studies were near it and I did some learning just for myself. Reports from implementation wouldn't be available for obvious reasons, most of this is basing on known technologies. Most complicated is controlling self-assembly without unwanted side effects. Of course it would require much more personel but with proper data extraction tools workforce could be reduced.
Then it’s on you to prove otherwise. I’m waiting.
I… don’t think the question fits the context.
Okay, that’s debatable. It’s hard to give a future timeframe on things we don’t know we don’t know, but going off of what we’ve (failed) to learn for, say, the last half century, I’m not optimistic about the biosciences.
Any evidence of that?
Exactly. I mean, if you think standard chip manufacturing has a lot of rejected dies, hoo-wee, there’s going to be an order of magnitude more rejects if we’re talking nano-scale constructs like this.
5 PM's but refusing to comment in the thread...
you've shown yourself for what you are: everything you've accused me of in the PM's. it was fun, but now i'm bored. ciao.
tallest pedo is a fed. only here to attack anyone saying the truth, and the mods are helping him harass people as well. Just block and ignore him
if his history hadn't already, this thread and the PM's made it pretty clear tallestpedo isn't motivated whatsoever by the spirit of honest inquiry. was just giving the fed POS more rope.
Thanks for admitting that everything in your image is an admitted lie, paid shill.