the intra-body nano-network
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
If you are not shill then you are idiot. Black projects.
Thanks for confirming everything I said. The existence of black projects does not imply the veracity of literally any claim made by anyone, anywhere, at any time, for any reason. The buzzwords in the graphic above are all real concepts, none of which have been even individually implemented in real-world scenarios. Most are simply mathematical models. None of which CAN be implemented in the assembly presented at the end of the image, because the laws of physics prevent their operation in this way.
And that’s without even bringing up the overarching premise of the image, which is “mass mind control through artificial neuronal impulses”–a complete psychosis that implies a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more.
That are basing on open-source-available informations you have. You are assuming openly available technology is most advanced one available XD
Oh,which ones ?
No more than 50 years, actually I guess rather 30 max if we are talking about "available science" not being kept secret.
For maintaining control with paralysing of victims/killing or neuromodulation even less/probably even applicable now.
Maybe I have no direct degree in biotech or nanoscience,but nevertheless my studies were near it and I did some learning just for myself. Reports from implementation wouldn't be available for obvious reasons, most of this is basing on known technologies. Most complicated is controlling self-assembly without unwanted side effects. Of course it would require much more personel but with proper data extraction tools workforce could be reduced.
Then it’s on you to prove otherwise. I’m waiting.
I… don’t think the question fits the context.
Okay, that’s debatable. It’s hard to give a future timeframe on things we don’t know we don’t know, but going off of what we’ve (failed) to learn for, say, the last half century, I’m not optimistic about the biosciences.
Any evidence of that?
Exactly. I mean, if you think standard chip manufacturing has a lot of rejected dies, hoo-wee, there’s going to be an order of magnitude more rejects if we’re talking nano-scale constructs like this.
Any evidence of that?
Example evidence: https://elifesciences.org/articles/27069/figures
I think it is enough,no need of mind control if you could "discipline" anybody with just clicking a button and freezing this person/making it feeling terrible pains etc.
Yes and no. It depends on the purpose of use. Direct mind control - very hard and complicated,making many problems unless they have much more advanced secret technologies. Something less however,for example catastrophic headache or paralysing people - 100% available. Or just neuromodulation, causing uncontrollable rage/anger/fury for everybody affected on demand. Or just the opposite maybe: making people apathetic and calm on demand
No need for so strong fields even if there are nanoparticles in planned places.
Funny thing I notice dual meaning and irony here as I am not english native speaker.
But if you mean mass production - while those graphene oxide nanoelements would be hard and not so cheap - still total control on a person is worth more than microprocessor price, the rest is not the problem at all. Self-replication, DNA or even RNA is the key.