the intra-body nano-network
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
There are no carbon nanotubes in the body. There is no graphene in the body. You don’t have a fucking clue what a quantum dot even is. Hydrogel swimmers are a mathematical model. Plasmonic nanoantennae have nothing even remotely like the bandwidth or range you think they do. Microscopic constructs of individual molecules cannot have a MAC address. Oh, and perhaps most importantly,
There’s not a single paper published anywhere in the fucking world which shows even one the steps required to so much as pretend to use a system like this in order to elicit even a single, random neuronal command in any living tissue.
Go back to the flat earth spam. At least that’s something where you’re not actively covering up anything.
5 PM's but refusing to comment in the thread...
you've shown yourself for what you are: everything you've accused me of in the PM's. it was fun, but now i'm bored. ciao.
tallest pedo is a fed. only here to attack anyone saying the truth, and the mods are helping him harass people as well. Just block and ignore him
if his history hadn't already, this thread and the PM's made it pretty clear tallestpedo isn't motivated whatsoever by the spirit of honest inquiry. was just giving the fed POS more rope.
Thanks for admitting that everything in your image is an admitted lie, paid shill.
why did you delete your comment about my posting FE spam, and then send a PM that had "Template: Response:" as the header?
edit: that's 2 PM's now from TK with the heading "Template: Response:", the 2nd PM claiming the deleted comment isn't deleted.
4PM's... why aren't you commenting in thread where everyone can read? yet, your pm's call me a coward...
that's 3 PM's now, all with the same "Template: Response" heading. why not just comment in the thread?
edit: 3rd PM is making threats. this is acceptable behavior? mods?
If you are not shill then you are idiot. Black projects.
Thanks for confirming everything I said. The existence of black projects does not imply the veracity of literally any claim made by anyone, anywhere, at any time, for any reason. The buzzwords in the graphic above are all real concepts, none of which have been even individually implemented in real-world scenarios. Most are simply mathematical models. None of which CAN be implemented in the assembly presented at the end of the image, because the laws of physics prevent their operation in this way.
And that’s without even bringing up the overarching premise of the image, which is “mass mind control through artificial neuronal impulses”–a complete psychosis that implies a level of understanding of neurochemistry that we won’t have for a century or more.
That are basing on open-source-available informations you have. You are assuming openly available technology is most advanced one available XD
Oh,which ones ?
No more than 50 years, actually I guess rather 30 max if we are talking about "available science" not being kept secret.
For maintaining control with paralysing of victims/killing or neuromodulation even less/probably even applicable now.
Maybe I have no direct degree in biotech or nanoscience,but nevertheless my studies were near it and I did some learning just for myself. Reports from implementation wouldn't be available for obvious reasons, most of this is basing on known technologies. Most complicated is controlling self-assembly without unwanted side effects. Of course it would require much more personel but with proper data extraction tools workforce could be reduced.
Then it’s on you to prove otherwise. I’m waiting.
I… don’t think the question fits the context.
Okay, that’s debatable. It’s hard to give a future timeframe on things we don’t know we don’t know, but going off of what we’ve (failed) to learn for, say, the last half century, I’m not optimistic about the biosciences.
Any evidence of that?
Exactly. I mean, if you think standard chip manufacturing has a lot of rejected dies, hoo-wee, there’s going to be an order of magnitude more rejects if we’re talking nano-scale constructs like this.
Any evidence of that?
Example evidence: https://elifesciences.org/articles/27069/figures
I think it is enough,no need of mind control if you could "discipline" anybody with just clicking a button and freezing this person/making it feeling terrible pains etc.
Yes and no. It depends on the purpose of use. Direct mind control - very hard and complicated,making many problems unless they have much more advanced secret technologies. Something less however,for example catastrophic headache or paralysing people - 100% available. Or just neuromodulation, causing uncontrollable rage/anger/fury for everybody affected on demand. Or just the opposite maybe: making people apathetic and calm on demand
No need for so strong fields even if there are nanoparticles in planned places.
Funny thing I notice dual meaning and irony here as I am not english native speaker.
But if you mean mass production - while those graphene oxide nanoelements would be hard and not so cheap - still total control on a person is worth more than microprocessor price, the rest is not the problem at all. Self-replication, DNA or even RNA is the key.
That's what they're putting in vaccines, nano antennas that self assemble. for what fucking reason.. who knows.
5G zombies? "men shall seek death and will not find it"