Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

37
()
posted 2 years ago by DrLeaks 2 years ago by DrLeaks +37 / -0
13 comments share
13 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (13)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– Iknowitsu 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

A bit silly.

He could start a new company, give it a new name… and probably have just as much reach.

In fact… PV did a lot wrong. They came off too partisan. I bet he could do it better with his own organization.

The PV brand is dog shit but his reputation is golden.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ObsidianSword 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Easier said than done.

It takes a lot of time and money to create fake identities for investigators, and he has to find new security/intelligence experts too to deal with government interference. It's a huge hit if he actually gets kicked out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Iknowitsu 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

It really wouldn’t be too difficult for him to raise the capital.

Not at all.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– aldagautr 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

the board needs to realize PV will likely not survive if the go through with this!e.

That's definitely their intention.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– dontkillmehillary 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I legit thought PV was a small operation run by OKeefe similar to Steven Crowders deal. I had no idea that they actually were large enough to have a board of directors.

I suspect I'm not the only one who thought that, and like u/Iknowitsu said, he will probably start something new and PV will die.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– glownigger8675309 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

the board needs to realize PV will likely not survive if the go through with this!

that is likely the point. JOK got some pretty good scoops that showed the woke agenda's malfeascance.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Foletado 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

There is a video in which he and a manager he brought in from another company (CNN?) were telling the story of how he came to Project Veritas. James intended to call a PV employee but mis-dialed and called the man they had exposed at the other company and yelled at him for not being at work at night. If it were at another time, I could believe that this was really about problems James had in managing. -- however this comes just after PV's biggest under-cover report ever -- the huge scandal of Pfizer working to create new viruses. Given the timing, I'm not buying it either.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– cant_even 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

... as the "noticing" accelerates.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– DustyGoose 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Pfizer is looking more and more like the mafia lately

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– TallestSkil 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Oh well. Doesn’t matter.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy