Gender-neutral God to be considered by Church of England
(www.telegraph.co.uk)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
God is above 'penis' and vagina' as differentiation. That's for physically differentiated bodies to use to procreate.
The spiritual understanding of the theological Androgyne is brought down (fallen) to the material level when attempting to denote 'sex' to god.
DaVinci hints at this in his art, with himself as Mona Lisa (One God) had he been born a woman. He did not paint himself wearing a dress.
Also showing in the Last Supper (with hidden grail) that John represents the 'feminine principle' in male form. As John was said to be the precursor to the Christ who was considered 'the androgyne' by gnostic tradition because of his neutral position in all things as the middle arm of the cross. The zero sum fulcrum or hub of all wheels turning around it's center.
Should the Church attempt to bring down or allow others to raise up?
Christianity is failing.
I roll my eyes now when a Christian criticizes a muslim. Islam protects traditional values against globalism and against satanic jews so much better.
I know I have a history with muslims. But that was 500 years ago.
Christian leaders are sellouts. For jew money, they'll support abortion, gay marriage, transgenderism, etc. Jews were the ones who murdered Christ. Judas sold out for profit. Christian leaders like the pope or presbyterian church are modern Judas's begging jew for 40 coins.
Islam is a degenerate and primitive religion for degenerate and primitive people.
Muslim women have a higher fertility rate than your white Christian women.
Muslims murder faggots. Christians have BECOME faggots
Muslims stone adulterers. Christians reward adulterers with alimony payments and custody.
Muslims kick jews out of their countries because they are the synagogue of satan. Christians worship synagogue of satan jews who murdered Christ. Christians put more energy, labor, and effort into serving the Jew than they do Christ, whether it be the jew banker, the jew paid for politician, the jew owned corporation, or even their jew controlled military.
Muslim women are conservative, cover up their bodies, honor their husbands and mother their children. Christian women are whores, get abortions, take birth control, sleep around with niggers, etc.
And this is coming from a Christian. I am a Christian. This is what I see Christian culture in USA has become. Christians with no consequence for sin and infinite forgiveness? Failed Christian leaders who sell out to fill pews. Christians that lack the conviction of Christ to actually do anything of real substance to combat evil in the world.
You must never have met a Muslim in your whole life.
How does it feel, simping for a pedo cult? Would you let Mohammed rape your 9 year old daughter?
I am on Muslim top 10 most wanted list.
How old was the virgin Mary when The Holy Spirit (GOD) fertilized her?
You simp for a pedo cult.
You actually believe that this happened? What Christian denomination do you follow?
Do you have a source for her alledged age?
I think I've made valid points
Christians need to look how much they've failed. Christian societies turned into modern day Babylon. At least Muslims uphold a traditional decency.
Also, much of your hatred of Muslims today is just Jew Propaganda.
A pedo cult? Geez. I didn't know Epstein was Muslim. Catholic Church isn't a pedo cult? It's the muslims? If you say so. I'll ignore those Catholic paintings of naked baby boys dicks hanging out with wings. Where in the bible did it say angels are little boys with big dicks and wings? Or was that what the pedo cult catholics asked the painter to paint?
Just shows that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Go vistit an Arab country. I visit there regularly. The amount of proposals for gay sex I get there is unreal.
Sure the Catholic Church is a pedo cult. All abrahamic religions are.
Was that some attempt at a gotcha?
Generation (process of dying) represents the neutral foundation for the generated struggles (living) within.
IM'AGE, noun [Latin imago.] - "a representation or similitude formed of a material substance" aka living (inter) within the process of dying (change).
Aka ENGLA LAND aka land of the angles...if two lines meet at a point, then that implies a meeting within motion. As for the two lines...
And the point? The living ones perspective (perceiving) within the process of dying (perceivable). Both lines coexisting implies a cross... https://pic8.co/sh/xR1I92.jpg (the other side of the cross reads "CEMS aka Church of England's Men Society")
"And Lo So it came to pass the Zhe had created Zhe for the companion of Zhe. And Zhe beholden Zhe and Begot no Zhe becuase there was no way for Zhe and Zhe to have a Zhe. Zhe had the zame seed and Zhe and betwixt these seeds there could be no Begotten Zhe."
"Alas! cried Zhe 'take from thy hand thou lighning, takthe from my hand Zhe sweat from Zhe brow and bestow thy with some fucking common sense!"
"Then Zhe came upon Z_e, and pleased that Zhe may identify and a Zhe for the purpose to beget a Zhe"
The point of the trick is the Evil One gathers a flock of gullible sheep and leads them off the path of righteousness and into death.
All modern churches are corrupted by evil. All.
a) to believe in a creator implies one to be the created, hence out of origin.
b) wanting outcome (goals) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to origin.
c) doesn't suggested outcome tempt one to ignore perceivable origin..."You shall have no other gods before Me.” ?
a) free will of choice represents the separated "reaction" within the "enacting" origin separating itself from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving).
b) FREE implies within dominance, WILL (want) implies within need; OF implies out of, hence in response to, and CHOICE implies within balance.
c) all separation of origin (whole into partial) implies a self differentiation of origin, which is why those within perceive moving differences as perceivable inspiration for adaption.
a) RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law....the inversion of perceivable (enacting) to choice (reaction) natural law.
"in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti" implies the contract law of those suggesting "in nomine (in the name of)" and those consenting (by faith) to the suggested (patris et filii et spiritus sancti).
Meanwhile within perceivable...Padri (whole) Filii (partial) Spiritus (Latin spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of partial within whole).
b) nature sets itself apart aka from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living), which implies each ones struggle to sustain self as apartheid (living) within wholeness (dying).
c) the parasitic few suggest the inversion of apartheid, hence together as e pluribus unum (out of many, one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united states; united nations; european union; uniformity or equality (sameness) through diversity (differences).
d) RE (respond to) UNITE (Latin unitas; unity; unus, one) implies as reacting one (perceiving) within enacting oneness (perceivable). The many ignore this because the few suggest them "dualism", hence counting perceivable differences (one among other ones) as suggested sameness (two).
Test this...look at anything you believe represents "two" and notice that you perceive each "one" of them separately. That's how communication between perceivable whole and perceiving partials work...differentiation in motion.
a) if origin implies "complete, whole, everything", then how could anything partial be able to not stay within it?
The trick being played on the many....suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) over perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything). As temporary from (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death), transmutation implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka ingredient out of base transmutation...alchemy.
b) consider that if religion (to bind anew) represents your consent to believe; submit; have faith in, the suggestions of others, then that those others are suggesting the purposes aka the few suggesting "progressivism" to direct the consenting many towards outcomes, as to tempt them to ignore being the resistance (living) within the progressing origin (process of dying)?
If you have a problem thinking like this, then consider if your consent to what others are suggesting you to think interferes with your discernment within perceivable.
Try need over want; inspiration (perceivable) over information (suggested) and implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; good vs bad etc.)...these can help clear ones mind, but it's a choice only oneself can make.
Why would I call out choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law (aka religion) and then consent to suggested Gnosticism? Every suggested -ism implies binding oneself to another by consent, hence shirking response-ability (choice) onto others.
Edit: GNOS'TIC, noun [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"....suggested Gnosticism tempts one to ignore that.