My understanding is he impersonated campaign voting instructions. This isn't really free speech it's a form of fraud. I agree it's a slippery slope, but let's also choose which hills we defend.
I don't agree. Posting messages on some random social media should never be considered an authenticated medium for accepting government discourse/instructions.
The training should be clear, verify your sources understand the information you are accepting and that is the only way to move this forward.
Fraudulent messages on a criminals network travelling along side all the other rotten filth, you want to pluck out the odd message shine it up and swear by it.
My understanding is he impersonated campaign voting instructions. This isn't really free speech it's a form of fraud. I agree it's a slippery slope, but let's also choose which hills we defend.
I don't agree. Posting messages on some random social media should never be considered an authenticated medium for accepting government discourse/instructions.
The training should be clear, verify your sources understand the information you are accepting and that is the only way to move this forward.
So in your world view we should defend fraud as free speech? Seems larpy
Fraudulent messages on a criminals network travelling along side all the other rotten filth, you want to pluck out the odd message shine it up and swear by it.
And you are asking me if I am doing it wrong?
I think it sends a bad impression if this is what we fight for. Like choose the battles. For example: that guy kicked out of mall for Jesus shirt.