Fraudulent messages on a criminals network travelling along side all the other rotten filth, you want to pluck out the odd message shine it up and swear by it.
Perhaps, but more likely just spread it out so it is all visible. These crimes should not go unnoticed.
Only official channels should be used for official discourse and we should not be accepting the use of these random bot driven criminal operated networks to qualify as official sources.
There is no way a message that is official should be provided on such mediums at all.
Such obvious hatred for Christianity must be punished, to discriminate against religion is not acceptable in a public setting.
So in your world view we should defend fraud as free speech? Seems larpy
Fraudulent messages on a criminals network travelling along side all the other rotten filth, you want to pluck out the odd message shine it up and swear by it.
And you are asking me if I am doing it wrong?
I think it sends a bad impression if this is what we fight for. Like choose the battles. For example: that guy kicked out of mall for Jesus shirt.
Perhaps, but more likely just spread it out so it is all visible. These crimes should not go unnoticed.
Only official channels should be used for official discourse and we should not be accepting the use of these random bot driven criminal operated networks to qualify as official sources.
There is no way a message that is official should be provided on such mediums at all.
Such obvious hatred for Christianity must be punished, to discriminate against religion is not acceptable in a public setting.
Censorship is a dangerous slippery slope for sure. The official sources aspect feels like a good solution.