My understanding is he impersonated campaign voting instructions. This isn't really free speech it's a form of fraud. I agree it's a slippery slope, but let's also choose which hills we defend.
I don't agree. Posting messages on some random social media should never be considered an authenticated medium for accepting government discourse/instructions.
The training should be clear, verify your sources understand the information you are accepting and that is the only way to move this forward.
Don't mislead people at the poles- that's a known free speech exclusion zone due to concerns about voter tampering and intimidation.
lol, ridiculous claims based on 0 logical grounds, fairly confident this will be shut down.
0 evidence to prove anything and trumped up accusations and abuse of the wording of the law, the case does not look good for the far left zealots.
Carry on.
My understanding is he impersonated campaign voting instructions. This isn't really free speech it's a form of fraud. I agree it's a slippery slope, but let's also choose which hills we defend.
I don't agree. Posting messages on some random social media should never be considered an authenticated medium for accepting government discourse/instructions.
The training should be clear, verify your sources understand the information you are accepting and that is the only way to move this forward.
So in your world view we should defend fraud as free speech? Seems larpy