My understanding is he impersonated campaign voting instructions. This isn't really free speech it's a form of fraud. I agree it's a slippery slope, but let's also choose which hills we defend.
I don't agree. Posting messages on some random social media should never be considered an authenticated medium for accepting government discourse/instructions.
The training should be clear, verify your sources understand the information you are accepting and that is the only way to move this forward.
Fraudulent messages on a criminals network travelling along side all the other rotten filth, you want to pluck out the odd message shine it up and swear by it.
lol, ridiculous claims based on 0 logical grounds, fairly confident this will be shut down.
0 evidence to prove anything and trumped up accusations and abuse of the wording of the law, the case does not look good for the far left zealots.
Carry on.
My understanding is he impersonated campaign voting instructions. This isn't really free speech it's a form of fraud. I agree it's a slippery slope, but let's also choose which hills we defend.
I don't agree. Posting messages on some random social media should never be considered an authenticated medium for accepting government discourse/instructions.
The training should be clear, verify your sources understand the information you are accepting and that is the only way to move this forward.
So in your world view we should defend fraud as free speech? Seems larpy
Fraudulent messages on a criminals network travelling along side all the other rotten filth, you want to pluck out the odd message shine it up and swear by it.
And you are asking me if I am doing it wrong?