Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

10
maybe “We’ll Know Our Disinformation Program Is Complete When Everything the American Public Believes Is False” applies to nukes. (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 2 years ago by glownigger8675309 2 years ago by glownigger8675309 +13 / -3
17 comments download share
17 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (17)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– glownigger8675309 [S] 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

pretty good thread: https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/414240287#p414252325

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hutter 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Ahh common, so many flat earthers

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TallestSkil 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

all nukes are identical

What a stupid assumption.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– AI_ML_Expert 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

"There was none prior to 1952."

Good luck trying to prove that.

"But the article says..."

Don't care.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +4 / -2
▲ 1 ▼
– Primate98 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

If there are no nukes, then what turned the WTC to dust? Judy Wood says DEWs (are these really MTG's Jew space lasers?).

But then we are confronted with the problem of producing evidence for DEWs powerful enough to turn skyscrapers into dust, aren't we? Maybe we should start with DEWs powerful enough to turn a brick into dust. If someone has evidence of a brick turning to dust from a DEW, please link us to it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– glownigger8675309 [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

> what turned the WTC to dust?

> the problem of producing evidence for DEWs powerful enough

Hutchison Effect. JW mentions this in one of her talks. Hutchison Effect def worth researching on your own. The Art Bell interview has vid from hurchison's lab, long before 9/11. Hutchison's equipment was all scavenged from military surplus stores. Some of JW's 9/11 photos show stuff that looks exactly like what Hutchison was doing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Primate98 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Is it your judgement that there is more evidence for the Hutchinson Effect than for atomic weapons?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– glownigger8675309 [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

for 9/11? imho, yes. reports of parked cars being moved around, the various burned vehicles not immediately near the crash site, and especially the vid of the radio/TV tower dustifying when it starts to fall, are all better explained via Hutchison effect.

There were reports of jumpers and people in the windows tearing their clothes off, and I suspect that has something to do with the Hutchison effect, either on clothing or physiologically to a human (like microwave crowd control stuff). ...though being in the energy cone of a pure neutron bomb is probably unpleasant as well :)

I'm not against the nuke hypothesis. If it was me, I would have gone with a multi-pronged approach. Thermite first to weaken the overall structure, then the Hutchison effect to start effecting the metal internally, then, when the Hutchison effect(s) reach a certain point, the nuke. iirc, neutron bombs also effect the internal structure of metals to make them more brittle.

it's unlikely the prep for such an event would go unnoticed by researchers after the fact. Dancing Israelis and thermite provide a wonderful distraction from the higher-level tech TPTB also used, which includes the magic/manifestation from a room full of children yelling "Kite", "hit", "steel", "plane", "must"..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– jack445566778899 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

why didn't they just start WW3 to kill even more white men

Lol, be careful what you wish for!

But, to answer your question; why would you want to murder all the slaves you force to do your work? And in this case, to make the situation even more preposterous - if nuclear “doomsday” weapons existed and all the fear porn propaganda about them absolutely true; even if you should want, for whatever reason, to kill all the whites - you would make the world, that you need, unlivable and the food poisonous if you used them to get the job done...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– deleted -1 points 2 years ago +2 / -3
▲ 1 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler 1 point 2 years ago +3 / -2

I agree with others that nuclear bombs are extremely exaggerated.

They are either completely fake, or not nearly as destructive as we are brainwashed to believe. Jew globalists want us to believe they have the ability and power to destroy us. The truth is jews are just corrupt frauds who can print fiat money and lie. Blow up thousands of square miles? Nope.

If nuclear bombs do exist, jews should all assemble at the test site so we can gauge just how powerful they really are. See if it'll blow up the chosen peoples.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– TallestSkil 0 points 2 years ago +2 / -2

The logic you used isnt strait.

Said the psychopathic flat earther.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy