> the problem of producing evidence for DEWs powerful enough
Hutchison Effect. JW mentions this in one of her talks. Hutchison Effect def worth researching on your own. The Art Bell interview has vid from hurchison's lab, long before 9/11. Hutchison's equipment was all scavenged from military surplus stores. Some of JW's 9/11 photos show stuff that looks exactly like what Hutchison was doing.
for 9/11? imho, yes. reports of parked cars being moved around, the various burned vehicles not immediately near the crash site, and especially the vid of the radio/TV tower dustifying when it starts to fall, are all better explained via Hutchison effect.
There were reports of jumpers and people in the windows tearing their clothes off, and I suspect that has something to do with the Hutchison effect, either on clothing or physiologically to a human (like microwave crowd control stuff). ...though being in the energy cone of a pure neutron bomb is probably unpleasant as well :)
I'm not against the nuke hypothesis. If it was me, I would have gone with a multi-pronged approach. Thermite first to weaken the overall structure, then the Hutchison effect to start effecting the metal internally, then, when the Hutchison effect(s) reach a certain point, the nuke. iirc, neutron bombs also effect the internal structure of metals to make them more brittle.
it's unlikely the prep for such an event would go unnoticed by researchers after the fact. Dancing Israelis and thermite provide a wonderful distraction from the higher-level tech TPTB also used, which includes the magic/manifestation from a room full of children yelling "Kite", "hit", "steel", "plane", "must"..
> what turned the WTC to dust?
> the problem of producing evidence for DEWs powerful enough
Hutchison Effect. JW mentions this in one of her talks. Hutchison Effect def worth researching on your own. The Art Bell interview has vid from hurchison's lab, long before 9/11. Hutchison's equipment was all scavenged from military surplus stores. Some of JW's 9/11 photos show stuff that looks exactly like what Hutchison was doing.
Is it your judgement that there is more evidence for the Hutchinson Effect than for atomic weapons?
for 9/11? imho, yes. reports of parked cars being moved around, the various burned vehicles not immediately near the crash site, and especially the vid of the radio/TV tower dustifying when it starts to fall, are all better explained via Hutchison effect.
There were reports of jumpers and people in the windows tearing their clothes off, and I suspect that has something to do with the Hutchison effect, either on clothing or physiologically to a human (like microwave crowd control stuff). ...though being in the energy cone of a pure neutron bomb is probably unpleasant as well :)
I'm not against the nuke hypothesis. If it was me, I would have gone with a multi-pronged approach. Thermite first to weaken the overall structure, then the Hutchison effect to start effecting the metal internally, then, when the Hutchison effect(s) reach a certain point, the nuke. iirc, neutron bombs also effect the internal structure of metals to make them more brittle.
it's unlikely the prep for such an event would go unnoticed by researchers after the fact. Dancing Israelis and thermite provide a wonderful distraction from the higher-level tech TPTB also used, which includes the magic/manifestation from a room full of children yelling "Kite", "hit", "steel", "plane", "must"..