We're witnessing a coordinated effort to whip up coronavirus hysteria on /r/conspiracy. Threads and comments calling for skeptic...
Disclaimer: I have a decade of experience posting on /r/conspiracy, and I'm one of the most prolific contributors in the history of this sub. I...
The narrative pushers are trying to claim that the conspiracy theorists were "freaking out" about COVID in the beginning. In fact, WE were the ones calling out the "falling bodies" as fake and gay. We also called out the "millions of missing cell phones" scam from China that was meant to fuel the rumors of a "deadly" disease. We saw it immediately.
All of the accounts, on reddit at least, that were pushing these fantasies were fake accounts. They were really obvious about it, too.
This thread from January obliterates their talking points. The fact that it received thousands of upvotes and the comments generally agreed is all the proof you need that the veteran conspiracy theorists called it right away.
I remember seeing "alternative" media like Zero Hedge spazzing out about the "lab leak" theory. That made it even more obvious that the fix was in. The false dichotomy was set in motion early on.
There's a reason that folks like me needed to be removed from the equation. We were right about "COVID" from day 1, and they need to erase this fact from history as the house of cards continues to collapse.
Good work. I got that stuff wrong.
What's your solution to being silenced? Most of us are also silenced and can't share ideas anywhere, anymore... Except for dead ends, like this site
unironically try twitter? it's still pozzed but you probably won't get banned.
Twitter permanently banned me, same day reddit permanently banned me, only a few hours apart. This was back in 2020. I was definitely someone they wanted to shut up, even though I rarely amass any followers.
I recently submitted an appeal to Twitter, so I should learn this week if it will be reversed.
To be honest, I think something much more sinister is happening on LinkedIn. I don't think they're as quick to ban anyone but if you want to take social credit to the next level (preventing people from getting work) LinkedIn is the perfect tool for shadowbanning people from society.
LinkedIn was mentioned in the twitter files and no one ran with any stories about that.
Sadly, LI is the only place I can say anything but I'm fully doxxed in that non-annonomous wasteland of Ned Flander corporate cringe.
If we have discourse, a interchange of ideas.
Then no, I wouldnt consider it a dead end.
Proof should be all the new accounts lately, especially the ones who seem to hate conspiracy theories, yet are posting on a conspiracy sub.
The amount of users here could share a single joint
The whole (process of dying) and each partial within (living)...differences within sameness. The pages of suggested narratives like opposing governments are for the many who ignore perceivable.
Only after you (didnt) kill (himself) their favorite child abuse dealer...
This is Satan's horde frantically looking for a new Fallen Angel to rule over earth.
If one knew that video games are predictive programming circuit boards and played the game series: Batman: Arkham City/Arkham Knights etc one could have seen what was going to happen with interlaced DNA 'bat flu' along with simultaneous rioting, with complicity of the police chief because they 'had his daughter', and a 'gas of confusion' caused by a supposed environmental threat.
2011 -2015
Nobody believed.
"Conspiracy theorists" are still busy collecting Riddler trophies...
Grind destroys minds and truth hurts butts.
Who could do all that grinding without catching the actual drift?
Forest for the trees.
a) what if the foundation of grinding represents living (resistance) within the process of dying (velocity), hence velocity (loss) meeting resistance (growth). This would imply that grinding not only destroys minds (death) but also sets (inception) minds.
b) if living within the process of dying, then need for temporary adaptation to ongoing motion. How does one adapt? By free will of choice. Therefore; choice implies FRE'QUENCY, noun - "a return or occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals" of resistance within velocity.
It took me 2-3 comics to catch the drift of "Batman" as a child; everything afterwards represents industrialized exploitation of my nurtured addiction to wanting to see others fix or destroy stuff, instead of failing at the former or getting punished for the latter by myself. All the masquerade stuff plays on that shirking of response-ability (choice).
As for the Riddler...suggested questions (wanting) tempt one to choose suggested answers (wanting more), while ignoring to be the perceiving problem (living) within the perceivable solution (process of dying), hence the need to resist suggested temptation.
"As bats is fighting to prevent the chaos to spread, does he ignore the struggle within to resist holding onto that which he contains in his head?" The dark knight struggles within ignorance; hence closing himself off from the light of comprehension.
Grinding represents hard work, on the side of light.
But... the cabal mirrors, so it's about you being a slave to their agenda, disguised as your own after it's been installed.
You didn't catch all the psychological nuances of Batman as a child, let's be honest. The 'take' on batman (and the whole hierarchy/mythos) is varied, like all psychologies/philosophies.
Traditionally, a bat from the cave sees where others don't and is a creature of the night and all that entails. (Baccardi family)
Superman was concurrent with the rise of nazi germany for reasons.
And even Superman hides 'in the open' behind a false identity as a 'reporter' of crimes........taking a 'social' responsibility to mask his true one.
I took responsibility without the mask or cape or super ability because others wouldn't do it. That simple.
Comic books are god surrogate.
Someone always having to fall out of the sky to save us.
Other similar surrogates keep us like children or sheep.
great post, do u remember this?
The people of Wuhan were trying to warn us that it was ALL "fake" in Feb 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6gS6_kyfhs
What's next axolotl?
convince him to run in 2024. imagine the 'tin foil' world runs on a cabinet. don't run as president, run as this is who my cabinet will be. e.g. ron paul new chairman of the federal reserve, kennedy as new cdc director, etc. would be wild
I'll let you know when I know ;)
Digital career... What being chronically online does to a mf.
I mean I realized shit was going bad around 2006. I didn't have a voice irl but I figured out that the internet could amplify one's message a thousandfold. So I spent many years trying to wake people up using the internet. I think I did a good job. That's the "digital career" I'm talking about...spending a chunk of my life researching and analyzing and warning about the things that have since come to pass. Maybe my phrasing was cringe, but that's the gist of what I was trying to say. I would rather have just focused on irl stuff the last couple decades, but here we are.
This is definitely something that has always bothered me. Three conflicting positions:
The virus was created by nature. The vaccine was created to stop it.
The virus was created in a lab to justify selling the poison mRNA shots.
Viruses don't exist. It was simply this year's reaction to the cold/sunless winter that was hyped on the news as a virus to justify selling the poison mRNA shots. The lab leak theory is to keep pushing the idea that viruses are real and can be created in a lab when they don't exist at all.
Am I to understand these three positions correctly?
And if so, where does this community generally stand on the subject? Or is there a fourth position you've adopted, or have I gotten one of three above grossly wrong?
Very succinct and accurate rundown of the "big 3" theories.. the last one is the truth. At first I was scoffing ANYONE who put forth the viruses arent real theory.. then the longer this hoax went on and the morr I researched I learned its all true. They have NEVER isolated and purified even ONE particle of "sars cov 2" in this many YEARS.. many insitutions claim they have but are lying: they are claiming a bio soup of monkey kidney cells, toxins, and random dna is "sars cov 2". Once you get this redpill you realize the lie is so Big that we are in deeeeep shit because there's too many arrogant normies who can't lower their pride enough to accept the real truth.. there never was a virus we were all tricked. They are getting us sick through chemicals and radiowave tech, and more.
Yeah, and each theory has major flaws. Like the 'no virus' theory. If cold and sunless winter causes illness then why do people in Africa, the middle east, tropics etc get sick?
Even if it is not viruses that transmit disease, something is transmitting. It is not 100% terrain.
Not that you're wrong about each theory having flaws, but I think you mistake what is meant by "terrain" in "Terrain Theory."
The body itself is the "terrain." The conditions within the body itself and all the pollutants/infections it contains. "Terrain Theory" isn't "people in nice climates don't get sick."
Nature cannot create (something out of nothing), it can only transmute...partial (living) out of whole (process of dying). Those within nature can suggest each other to ignore perceivable transmutation for suggested creationism.
Suggested "doing nothing" (don't) cannot exist within perceivable being done (living) within everything (process of dying).
Consent to suggested right (want) vs wrong (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable change. Motion doesn't communicate right or wrong...it sets free will of choice into balance (need/want). Balance represents the momentum of motion aka the perceivable, ever changing moment-um of "now".
I'm sorry....did you think I was actually implying that and thus, you felt a need to correct me?
Yeah I'm not sure you're the right person to reply to me on this topic.
Yeah that confirms it. Someone else who's not high right now wanna take a stab at this for me? First time posting on this forum. Getting the feeling it might be my last.
a) I adapt to perceivable inspiration, while resisting the temptation of suggested information.
b) I utilize implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement; true vs false; good vs bad etc.)
c) can temporary chaos (living) correct the ongoing natural order (process of dying) while existing within?
a) suggested "person" tempts one to ignore perceivable "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within perceivable sound. The few utilize the suggested word (fiction) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable sound (reality)...it's called spell-craft.
b) sound doesn't communicate right or wrong; it's the reaction of those within that shapes dissonance (need) or dissonance (want). Right vs wrong aka want vs not want reasoning represents dissonance.
AXO 2024, we're waiting for your campaign announcement
love your enthusiasm but seems like you want me to dox myself lol also I'm a conspiracy autist, not exactly politician material heh
this is why it must be you
Your most important content for me was either a) the annual pagan/satanic sacrifice of fire, or b) the 2020 election weirdness leading into J6.
Cohoax was so obvious I didn't need your help ;)
That disclaimer is truly something special.