It could be related to the nature of opposition being necessary to experience anything. Without pain, can you experience pleasure? Happiness and sorrow?
All of these things exist on a sliding metric, rather than just being binary components. This thing makes me a little happy, while this thing makes me VERY happy. Perhaps the level of each component is actually limited more than it could have been. The most excruciating pain might be less than it could have been if reality had increased the thresholds for these sensors.
Could we appreciate the same sensations if we just had a memory of this duality? For instance, if you spend 10 years experiencing the full gamut of sensations and emotions, would it be possible to still feel great happiness if all of the pain was removed from that point on? If that were to happen, the varying levels of happiness would describe the new thresholds we become accustomed to. VERY happy would be regular happy, while a little happy would become depression.
The thing that seems to be lacking is an arbiter that can ensure everyone can experience a lot of the positives while only enduring some of the negatives. Instead, many people are miserable almost their entire lives while some people are happy all of the time.
I suppose a god should fulfill this role of bringing justice to the world to ensure everyone has an equal opportunity for positive experiences. That does not seem to be the case though.
Somewhere way in the middle of David Icke's interview of Credo Mutwa, he mentioned that there was a time long ago when, if someone needed to take an animal to eat, one would emerge from the forest and kneel down to offer itself. They knew people needed to eat to survive, just like everything else.
It sounds crazy, but then I realized I don't actually have any evidence to dispute it. Could the world have been that way? I could raise my voice and wave my arms around and deny it, but that doesn't seem very convincing.
I can see that scenario. And then I can see the dawn of the ego, that wants to thrill at the conquest of power over others so it goads and toys with the offering telling it to use it's freewill all the while knowing the nets and veils have it trapped in a matrix of cycles. At this point however, the very nature of a cycle means that it reaches an end 🙃
Good read. To answer the question it would be worth considering the concept of entropy verses syntropy or also may be called negentropy. As a matter of time and space we have formed a collective reality based on entropy. This suits those who wish to keep the majority powerless. It's even said that Einsteins relativity theory was only partially released. To have syntropy, or future potential as a known factor would have left the middlemen of the government and church out of a job. It was deemed best that we remain bound to the trajectory of limited events on the narrative of a controlled timeline over the unlimited potential of eternity.
It could be related to the nature of opposition being necessary to experience anything. Without pain, can you experience pleasure? Happiness and sorrow?
All of these things exist on a sliding metric, rather than just being binary components. This thing makes me a little happy, while this thing makes me VERY happy. Perhaps the level of each component is actually limited more than it could have been. The most excruciating pain might be less than it could have been if reality had increased the thresholds for these sensors.
Could we appreciate the same sensations if we just had a memory of this duality? For instance, if you spend 10 years experiencing the full gamut of sensations and emotions, would it be possible to still feel great happiness if all of the pain was removed from that point on? If that were to happen, the varying levels of happiness would describe the new thresholds we become accustomed to. VERY happy would be regular happy, while a little happy would become depression.
The thing that seems to be lacking is an arbiter that can ensure everyone can experience a lot of the positives while only enduring some of the negatives. Instead, many people are miserable almost their entire lives while some people are happy all of the time.
I suppose a god should fulfill this role of bringing justice to the world to ensure everyone has an equal opportunity for positive experiences. That does not seem to be the case though.
This is what Twin Peaks was about. David Lynch called it pain and sorrow.
Their chicken fried steak is fire.
Somewhere way in the middle of David Icke's interview of Credo Mutwa, he mentioned that there was a time long ago when, if someone needed to take an animal to eat, one would emerge from the forest and kneel down to offer itself. They knew people needed to eat to survive, just like everything else.
It sounds crazy, but then I realized I don't actually have any evidence to dispute it. Could the world have been that way? I could raise my voice and wave my arms around and deny it, but that doesn't seem very convincing.
I can see that scenario. And then I can see the dawn of the ego, that wants to thrill at the conquest of power over others so it goads and toys with the offering telling it to use it's freewill all the while knowing the nets and veils have it trapped in a matrix of cycles. At this point however, the very nature of a cycle means that it reaches an end 🙃
Good read. To answer the question it would be worth considering the concept of entropy verses syntropy or also may be called negentropy. As a matter of time and space we have formed a collective reality based on entropy. This suits those who wish to keep the majority powerless. It's even said that Einsteins relativity theory was only partially released. To have syntropy, or future potential as a known factor would have left the middlemen of the government and church out of a job. It was deemed best that we remain bound to the trajectory of limited events on the narrative of a controlled timeline over the unlimited potential of eternity.
Even God himself apparently needed a sacrifice as well.
I don't think he "needed" it, do you? Maybe he could just tell by "predictive programming" that it was going to happen.
Canaanites are not Yahweh’s people. They are the seed of the serpent, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil https://christogenea.org/podcasts/identifying-tree-knowledge-good-and-evil
Maybe we dont. All our history is in question.
Omnivore seems to fit. But who knows? Maybe there is a better way but our consumption benefits someone. Not like that is unprecedented.