Why do round earthers get so emotional, when someone doesn't agree with them?
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
2 reasons.
1: It’s a conditioned response to protect their dogmas. you see it in most all organized religions/cults. it is to prevent any possible rational discussion, challenge, criticism, and/or dissent. scientism is the secular religion they practice, largely unwittingly/unknowingly. one of the first, and false, things many students are taught is how our “primitive” ancestors once believed that the world was flat and we enlightened moderns would never fall for that again. this biases young minds against ever seriously considering the idea, and outlines the punishment for doing so (becoming “primitive”, thought stupid/foolish; banishment from “intellectual modern society”)
2: The heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop encourages this false enmity (and false dichotomy) between “flattards” and “globetards” in order to further disable, prevent, and suppress any collaboration or earnest discussion/research on the valuable subject.
Untamed emotion blinds and prevents objective study or earnest discussion. There truly is no rational or intellectual reason to respond in such a way to an ostensibly silly claim like “the earth is flat” or any other.
To anyone with an interest, including critical, in the subject; please join us on flatearthresearch to further explore and exchange views!
Why do paid jewish shills continue to spam proven falsehoods to poison a well that is immune to their mental illness?
How does one ascertain "non-perceivable" (unknown) within everything perceivable (knowledge)?
What represents more of a memory illness...incoming input (perceivable inspiration) or held onto (suggested information)?
I've always found the ideas and points flat earthers made interesting. I don't know why people get so heated about it. I don't know why either side of the debate presents everything as a fact. We're here for conspiracy THEORIES. Present an idea as a theory, not a fact. I think it's great that people are questioning everything we have been taught from a young age. We live in a world of propaganda and lies. Some of the arguments are actually really good arguments.
I don't know if it is some kind of controlled opposition that dictates everyone has to insult each other constantly, or if people just act like that naturally. It definitely doesn't move the knowledge base anywhere when every comment is a series of juvenile expletive-filled insults.
It is usually shills/bots. They aren't interested in debate as they are incredibly vicious and mean.
They are ugly and offensive so that anyone reading or lurking psychologically doesn't want to be on the team being attacked. its an old and effective psychological tactic.
Example: if I said that I believe in Bigfoot, I would not get vicious ugly personal attacks on an actual conspiracy community.
Ideally there would be discussion, proofs on both sides, and then other unique theories about Bigfoot.
But with flat earth, it is someone asking a question or providing evidence, and getting downsized within seconds, with tons of accounts activated to launch personal attacks.
This will persuade on-lookers, some of whom will become anti-flat earthers themselves. And go on to mimic the attacks they saw. When all along it could have been bots or paid shills that started it.
See I just did a test.
This post had 5 up votes and 5 down votes. I just upvoted it and in seconds it got a down vote. That is really weird... if someone wanted to down vote why did they wait and watch? Or was it a bot?
There are a couple of topics this happens to... oddly enough, not covid ir lockdowns. I forget them all but one is religion/jesus and the Catholic Church.
I wonder if it is all related.
The principalities want us to think we are merely souless meat sacks, randomly evolved in a random universe. That nothing we do matters.
The theory of a flat earth implies earth is unique and that humans are special. So it begins to create a different sense of identity and purpose within people.
Back in the day, when people were Christian and had morals, they lived as through their lives mattered. People had more courage and were willing to devote their lives to an ideal. They were willing to sacrifice their lives even.
So I think it is just another way of keeping us entertained in a cave , watching shadow puppets. And never knowing what we are actually capable of.
Because agreement vs disagreement binds both sides reasoning against each other to the same suggestion to reason over. The few utilize suggestion to divide the many into reasoning about suggested.
Agreement vs disagreement, round vs flat; want vs not want...either side consents to suggested (want); while ignoring perceivable (need). Changing sides keeps one within the same conflict of reason. Reasoning over suggested represents a mental hamster-wheel, while giving those making the suggestions the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at will.
Instead of reasoning about suggested surroundings...how about discerning oneself to represent the center (perceiving) of everything surrounding (perceivable)?
All distances form the center point of this map projection is correct. This map should be the one taught at school, as it is a accurate map of what the world looks like. The globe is nothing more then this map wrapped around a ball, hoping no one is going to notice that huge part of the southern oceans went missing.