Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

27
I Agree with Elon's Statement Here (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 2 years ago by Questionable 2 years ago by Questionable +28 / -1
9 comments download share
9 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (9)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– Primate98 4 points 2 years ago +5 / -1

I also agree. Further, if Elon is a "limited hangout", tossing around terms like that is hanging it out way farther than necessary for no discernable reason.

It's enough to make me think the people still loudly insisting "eLoN iS a ShIlL!" are not very good at analysis. Or maybe just shills themselves.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DregaN 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I agree with your take primate. Limited hangout is meant to steer away.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Megascandal 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Right now he is acting as spanner in the works to the elites and their plans. In the past he has willingly worked with them, but also willingly exploited them for his own benefit. His EVs wouldn't have gotten off the ground if he couldn't scam the establishment leftists.

That said, Elon is a dangerous ally. The chips he wants to put into peoples brains and his desire for a one app for everything and his desire to end anonymity are all dangerous. I expect him to probably willingly kill tens of thousands of people if that's what it took to get his brainchips to work.

I personally think he is making a play. Either to overthrow the current establishment and place himself as king or saint, or to position himself as to valuable to fuck with. Placating him is the only way the elites get their critical ability to censorship back twitter.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Primate98 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Well, if he's going solo there is not one single other successful example we can point to. About the closest you can get would be Kim Dotcom, who ran off to the hinterlands, or John McAfee, who is dead or felt like he had to fake it. These are both smart, resourceful guys that only wished to speak some of what was on their minds.

So if Elon has "evil genius"-level smarts, he certainly knows that if you not with Them, you're against Them. Free-lancing is never, ever allowed. Observe any of Them closely, from George Soros to the King of England, and you can tell that none of them speak freely. They've all got invisible bosses who are listening.

Elon was certainly one of "Them" at one time and as freakish as any of them, but for some as yet impenetrable reason he turned some time ago. I think he's smart enough to know to leave Them guessing as to whether They can get him back in the fold, or They need to eliminate him and cook up another oligarch. Anyway, that's how I'd play it if I were him.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +3 / -2
▲ 1 ▼
– Traps4GME 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

There is no Satan.

There is no Jesus.

There is no Santa Klaus.

There is no Covid.

Its all a fucking hoax and you've been played

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Mrexreturns 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Jesus is a construct by underground cults despised by the Roman empire who would later become the Vatican.

The Americans just domesticated him like fairy tales domesticated fairies. American Christians could all be believing in Gnosticism and they wouldn't know.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1
  • SA'TAN, noun [Heb. an adversary.] + AD'VERSE, adjective [Latin adversus, opposite]

What's the opposite of opposite? IDEN'TITY, noun -"sameness, as distinguished from similitude (like) and diversity (difference)".

What if "sameness" cannot be perceived, since the one perceiving and whatever one perceives, imply a "different" position from one another?

What if others suggest "likeness" under the disguise of "sameness" (identitarianism) to harm each "different" one who consents?

ESG

ENVIROMENT...what surrounds (enviro) mind/memory (ment)?

SOCIAL...does "one" represent an aggregate body (social) or a separate body?

GOVERNMENT...could consenting to the suggestions of others allow them to control (govern) ones mind/memory (ment)?

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy