Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority (1961) hilariously sets the legal precedent for whether or not a private actor must respect and uphold the constitutional rights of citizens. If a private company is deemed to be a "state actor" (i.e. acting as an agent of or on behalf of the government), they are liable to uphold the Equal Protection Clause and thus the constitutional rights of citizens. That precedent was more than exceeded with the back channels and regular chain of communication between Twitter and the federal government, and especially the millions of dollars changing hands.
Machines do not have opinions or create facts from thin air. The chat AI rewrites content that it collects and disseminates. It may appear to be smart, but it just extracts contents from various sources, knows regular expressions and language and then re-writes things, so it avoids plagiarizing.
They are absolutely operating under the color of law as it was law enforcement that opened the dialog with the co-conspirators. shitty robot should just delete itself for being an obvious liar.
Wasn't that an Issac Asimov book?
Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority (1961) hilariously sets the legal precedent for whether or not a private actor must respect and uphold the constitutional rights of citizens. If a private company is deemed to be a "state actor" (i.e. acting as an agent of or on behalf of the government), they are liable to uphold the Equal Protection Clause and thus the constitutional rights of citizens. That precedent was more than exceeded with the back channels and regular chain of communication between Twitter and the federal government, and especially the millions of dollars changing hands.
Machines do not have opinions or create facts from thin air. The chat AI rewrites content that it collects and disseminates. It may appear to be smart, but it just extracts contents from various sources, knows regular expressions and language and then re-writes things, so it avoids plagiarizing.
The above content is nothing new.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-may-violated-first-amendment-twitter-moderation-requests-experts-warn
You'll never know for sure.
Agreed. You ask AI the same question twice and it will regurgitate two opposing viewpoints.
If the justice system was based on unequivocal facts, we wouldn't use trials, judges and juries.
The best humans are very good at making a decision in the face of equivocal data. Think of the times you just know what to do.
Knowing what to do when you don't know what to do is the power of the uber mensch.
"How can i ask a question that makes me look like a naive retard"
Stupid robot.
They are absolutely operating under the color of law as it was law enforcement that opened the dialog with the co-conspirators. shitty robot should just delete itself for being an obvious liar.