My guess is the earth is round, but potentially much larger. Stars are ether really close, or are not sun's. There is no possible way stars could remain visible at their supposed distance. There is just too much cosmic debris. Even a spec of dust in the atmosphere would block them. You can see them through the coma of a comet. The Oort cloud would regularly make stars vanish.
We are definitely being lied to about cosmology on a cosmic scale. If you were told stars were millions of miles away, instead of trillions, the possibility of alien contact is suddenly much more likely. Keeping that alone secret would be reason enough for the deception.
a) what if to believe (consent to want suggested) shapes opposition (those who consent to not want suggested)?
b) what if the few use suggested information (complex) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable inspiration (simple)?
They flip flop
What if the few deliberately contradict (talmudic reasoning) both sides of the suggested information, which the many are reasoning against each other over...thereby controlling both sides of every conflict?
they used to enforce Christianity and now they attack it
a) the merchant who aggressively promotes sales, has to devalue whatever sold for the next promoted article.
b) those who want suggested can be suggested to let go as to tempt them to hold onto it harder (muh precious).
You have to kick back and forth both ideas
Does one really have to consent to agree vs disagree with suggested idealism?
where the sliver of truth is.
a) what if suggested true (want) vs false (not want) tempts one to ignore perceivable (need)...everything of it...like the whole thing?
b) how can it be that within ALL of perceivable reality, one has to struggle to find a "sliver of truth" among the suggestions of others?
c) if nature doesn't lie, then could those within suggest truth to exploit those who consent with lies?
d) if one holds onto something (truth) within a moving system, then could others exploit ones ignorance of motion by contradicting (lie) what one holds onto?
There are usually slivers of truth within every lie and lies within every truth
Or there's a foundation (perceivable) underneath everything build within (suggested), while those within can tempt each other to ignore the former (reality) for the latter (fiction).
Keep digging
If living within the process of dying represents temporary growth within ongoing loss; then what does suggesting other to "keep digging" imply? Digging down into growth or digging down into loss?
Calm down. Are Jews trying to trick everyone into being Christian? Or are they now, according to you, trying to trick everyone into NOT being Christian? Or are Jews out to fuck you either way?
If one were merely to go by ones eyes, it would be fair to consider the Earth to be flat.
Unless those time lapse videos are near the axis, then the stars should be rising and setting on the horizon as the globe earth spins.
Bingo.
Or are those just time lapse videos of stars spinning in spiral circles over the flat earth?
Thing is, if the flatties were correct, the point of rotation wouldn’t move to the horizon… ever. It would only barely move from the zenith in relation to your physical position on the disc, but literally anyone can get footage from any latitude which proves their worldview wrong.
Research biblical cosmology. A flat unmoving earth, with a solid firmament above and local sun, moon, stars that rotate above us is absolutely Christian doctrine. Heliocentrism is Jesuit doctrine.
based and logic pilled. I see no inaccuracies in this post.
a) how many years of harm through consent to suggested pharmakia...and yet pills are still being suggested?
b) can one use logic (reason) without conflict (agreement vs disagreement)?
c) BASE, adjective - "low in place"...how about growing?
My guess is the earth is round, but potentially much larger. Stars are ether really close, or are not sun's. There is no possible way stars could remain visible at their supposed distance. There is just too much cosmic debris. Even a spec of dust in the atmosphere would block them. You can see them through the coma of a comet. The Oort cloud would regularly make stars vanish.
We are definitely being lied to about cosmology on a cosmic scale. If you were told stars were millions of miles away, instead of trillions, the possibility of alien contact is suddenly much more likely. Keeping that alone secret would be reason enough for the deception.
a) what if to believe (consent to want suggested) shapes opposition (those who consent to not want suggested)?
b) what if the few use suggested information (complex) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable inspiration (simple)?
What if the few deliberately contradict (talmudic reasoning) both sides of the suggested information, which the many are reasoning against each other over...thereby controlling both sides of every conflict?
a) the merchant who aggressively promotes sales, has to devalue whatever sold for the next promoted article.
b) those who want suggested can be suggested to let go as to tempt them to hold onto it harder (muh precious).
Does one really have to consent to agree vs disagree with suggested idealism?
a) what if suggested true (want) vs false (not want) tempts one to ignore perceivable (need)...everything of it...like the whole thing?
b) how can it be that within ALL of perceivable reality, one has to struggle to find a "sliver of truth" among the suggestions of others?
c) if nature doesn't lie, then could those within suggest truth to exploit those who consent with lies?
d) if one holds onto something (truth) within a moving system, then could others exploit ones ignorance of motion by contradicting (lie) what one holds onto?
Or there's a foundation (perceivable) underneath everything build within (suggested), while those within can tempt each other to ignore the former (reality) for the latter (fiction).
If living within the process of dying represents temporary growth within ongoing loss; then what does suggesting other to "keep digging" imply? Digging down into growth or digging down into loss?
Just eat shit, you fucking kike. We’re not denouncing Christianity and the evidence of our eyes.
Calm down. Are Jews trying to trick everyone into being Christian? Or are they now, according to you, trying to trick everyone into NOT being Christian? Or are Jews out to fuck you either way?
If one were merely to go by ones eyes, it would be fair to consider the Earth to be flat.
Just show proof earth is a spinning globe.
No.
No.
Nope, according to literally everyone on earth who isn’t a jew.
Drink bleach. I’m not dealing with this fucking spam every day.
Unless those time lapse videos are near the axis, then the stars should be rising and setting on the horizon as the globe earth spins.
Or are those just time lapse videos of stars spinning in spiral circles over the flat earth?
LOL don't let the flat earthers get your blood pressure up. I actually enjoy the flat earth theories despite being unconvinced myself.
Bingo.
Thing is, if the flatties were correct, the point of rotation wouldn’t move to the horizon… ever. It would only barely move from the zenith in relation to your physical position on the disc, but literally anyone can get footage from any latitude which proves their worldview wrong.
Research biblical cosmology. A flat unmoving earth, with a solid firmament above and local sun, moon, stars that rotate above us is absolutely Christian doctrine. Heliocentrism is Jesuit doctrine.
Wrong. Fuck off, paid shill.
The number of times ive heard that exact response, I can soundly say you are an NPC
Wrong. Fuck off, paid shill.
Holy shit, you are a NPC
Keep crying, you fucking kike. We will never accept your hoaxes here.
Speak for yourself npc.
You’d be wrong. Drink bleach.