Dont forget diet dude. Diet plays a huge part in everything. Yes fluoride, but what is happening to our pineal, to our etheric "self" with all the processed and chemicals we consume?
In my opinion once we start eating more natural. 1-2 steps tops from natures state. We enhance our chances of survival. And also increase our spiritual abilities. Because this alleviates oxidative stresses in the body. Kind of puts us at a more neutral position. For meditations.
a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, utilized for mass suggestion as RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
b) "don't sign" implies tempting others to consent to suggested; hence perpetuating contract law (consent to suggested); while ignoring natural law (adaptation to perceivable).
c) "don't" aka doing nothing represents ones ignorance of being done (living) by everything (process of dying).
d) how could partial (living) within whole (process of dying) get access to "more"?
Quotes from one of the "elite insider" threads....
"You have free will therefore you suffer (living) and are aware of your suffering (dying)"
"There is just one struggle and it is now, here...on a personal level....meaning you only. There is no enemy you can attack except yourself. If you are busy attacking something else, you are wasting precious energy and you will fail.If you succeed, there will be no struggle anymore".
That being said...
ESCA'PE, verb [Latin capio] - "to flee from and avoid; to get out of the way; to shun; to obtain security from; to pass without harm"
Aka capitulation; shirking of response-ability; denial of existence; willing ignorance...ask yourself if you represent partial (living) within whole (process of dying) and what the implication of "escaping" would be? Also notice that the parasitic few suggest escapism to the ignorant many as to tempt them to want to escape (from reality into fiction).
It’s an interesting idea but it’s kinda foolish to presume that any creation could remove your soul. At least in the Christian tradition that’s explicitly mentioned.
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
Matthew 10:18
They can try but some fag in a lab coat can’t hoodwink the Creator of the universe.
This could also explain why art, literature and architecture used to be so vibrant, so rich, so exquisitely detailed and so awe-inspiring. You compare works from the 15-19th century to now and all you see is a vast decline in skill, spiritualism and motivation for anything of value.
Tbf Rudolf lived in a time when humanity did not yet know nearly as much about which parts of the brain played a key role in moral concepts and decision making so most of that was still considered the soul. They knew only very crude things like how lobotomies left people with much more drool than personality. What he predicted manifested primarily in the field of pharmaceutical psychiatry. This has WAY more to do with psychiatry than with vaccination. Of course it probably won't be long before the 2 are merged, though. But for now this is in reference to things like children having a perfectly normal psychological response to situations like an alcoholic father or hysterical mother and then doping the kid up on "meds" to numb their emotions and dumb their thoughts.
Mortal substance (living) within immortal whole (process of dying).
eliminate
ELIM'INATE, verb - "to expel; to thrust out; to discharge; to set at liberty"
a) the momentum (balance) of flow (process of dying) sets form (living) at liberty (as free will of choice)
b) process of dying (loss) aka discharge + living (growth) aka recharge = balance (loss/growth) aka charge (internal power of energy).
c) the process of dying (whole base) thrusts out living (partial ingredient).
d) impressing (process of dying) for expression (living)
medicine
Ongoing medicine (process of dying); temporary sickness (living)...those who ignore perceivable medicine for suggested pharmakeia become PATIENT, adjective [Latin patiens.] - "sustaining afflictions through submission" aka ignoring to resist (living) temptation (dying).
In other words...consenting to suggested pharmakeia tempts one to ignore cause (perceivable) for diminished effect (suggested).
vaccine
Try viewing it this way...consenting to suggested vaccine implies wanting healthcare from others; hence shirking response-ability (choice) to take care of self by oneself. For those; it doesn't matter what's in the vaccine, because they gave up the sustenance of life to others, hence submitting to whatever comes; while bitching about consequences by blaming others for it.
Those who comprehend VAC'CINE, adjective [Latin vaccinus, from vacca, a cow.] aka that consent to suggested tempts one into a herd of cattle, those can be tempted with the fear of whats in a vaccine; because they already comprehend foul-play in the suggestion thereof. If you give those a saline injection called "vaccine"; they will suffer effects of being poisoned; because they believe to be poisoned.
Both viewpoints represent wanting or not wanting suggested "vaccine"...both ignore the need to resist want. One doesn't have to oppose what others are suggesting; one needs to comprehend that every suggestion (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality).
Yes, 1984 and Brave New World, and Idiocracy all rolled into this current era.
There is certainly a .minority in awareness.
Knowledge and navigation is individual. Many a path to the summit. Up to the person.
Dont forget diet dude. Diet plays a huge part in everything. Yes fluoride, but what is happening to our pineal, to our etheric "self" with all the processed and chemicals we consume?
In my opinion once we start eating more natural. 1-2 steps tops from natures state. We enhance our chances of survival. And also increase our spiritual abilities. Because this alleviates oxidative stresses in the body. Kind of puts us at a more neutral position. For meditations.
escape how? Through death?
a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, utilized for mass suggestion as RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
b) "don't sign" implies tempting others to consent to suggested; hence perpetuating contract law (consent to suggested); while ignoring natural law (adaptation to perceivable).
c) "don't" aka doing nothing represents ones ignorance of being done (living) by everything (process of dying).
d) how could partial (living) within whole (process of dying) get access to "more"?
Quotes from one of the "elite insider" threads....
"You have free will therefore you suffer (living) and are aware of your suffering (dying)"
"There is just one struggle and it is now, here...on a personal level....meaning you only. There is no enemy you can attack except yourself. If you are busy attacking something else, you are wasting precious energy and you will fail.If you succeed, there will be no struggle anymore".
That being said...
Aka capitulation; shirking of response-ability; denial of existence; willing ignorance...ask yourself if you represent partial (living) within whole (process of dying) and what the implication of "escaping" would be? Also notice that the parasitic few suggest escapism to the ignorant many as to tempt them to want to escape (from reality into fiction).
It’s an interesting idea but it’s kinda foolish to presume that any creation could remove your soul. At least in the Christian tradition that’s explicitly mentioned.
Matthew 10:18
They can try but some fag in a lab coat can’t hoodwink the Creator of the universe.
This could also explain why art, literature and architecture used to be so vibrant, so rich, so exquisitely detailed and so awe-inspiring. You compare works from the 15-19th century to now and all you see is a vast decline in skill, spiritualism and motivation for anything of value.
Thank God for Entheogens
Tbf Rudolf lived in a time when humanity did not yet know nearly as much about which parts of the brain played a key role in moral concepts and decision making so most of that was still considered the soul. They knew only very crude things like how lobotomies left people with much more drool than personality. What he predicted manifested primarily in the field of pharmaceutical psychiatry. This has WAY more to do with psychiatry than with vaccination. Of course it probably won't be long before the 2 are merged, though. But for now this is in reference to things like children having a perfectly normal psychological response to situations like an alcoholic father or hysterical mother and then doping the kid up on "meds" to numb their emotions and dumb their thoughts.
Mortal substance (living) within immortal whole (process of dying).
a) the momentum (balance) of flow (process of dying) sets form (living) at liberty (as free will of choice)
b) process of dying (loss) aka discharge + living (growth) aka recharge = balance (loss/growth) aka charge (internal power of energy).
c) the process of dying (whole base) thrusts out living (partial ingredient).
d) impressing (process of dying) for expression (living)
Ongoing medicine (process of dying); temporary sickness (living)...those who ignore perceivable medicine for suggested pharmakeia become PATIENT, adjective [Latin patiens.] - "sustaining afflictions through submission" aka ignoring to resist (living) temptation (dying).
In other words...consenting to suggested pharmakeia tempts one to ignore cause (perceivable) for diminished effect (suggested).
Try viewing it this way...consenting to suggested vaccine implies wanting healthcare from others; hence shirking response-ability (choice) to take care of self by oneself. For those; it doesn't matter what's in the vaccine, because they gave up the sustenance of life to others, hence submitting to whatever comes; while bitching about consequences by blaming others for it.
Those who comprehend VAC'CINE, adjective [Latin vaccinus, from vacca, a cow.] aka that consent to suggested tempts one into a herd of cattle, those can be tempted with the fear of whats in a vaccine; because they already comprehend foul-play in the suggestion thereof. If you give those a saline injection called "vaccine"; they will suffer effects of being poisoned; because they believe to be poisoned.
Both viewpoints represent wanting or not wanting suggested "vaccine"...both ignore the need to resist want. One doesn't have to oppose what others are suggesting; one needs to comprehend that every suggestion (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality).