Because it changes nothing. If by technicality the EU laid that pipe there, I know both the Danish and Germans laid sections of it in surrounding waters, and it was for EU consumption. What difference does it makes. Russia loses certain profit under question. Yes an immediate loss to it. They've shut off, and have had control over. Changing what. It was at diminished capacity under question. Those questions haven't changed. The EU doing it to themselves. They have anyway. No, the Americans, Nato perhaps. A technicality.
Attacking piping is an act of war in most situations. Except it's complicated if by chance it's attacking your own piping? What's the ownership? EU consumption, Russian grid, but the entire grid in which waters becomes questionable, if other nations funded or laid sections.
It gets more complicated when the entire pipeline shuts off.
Because it changes nothing. If by technicality the EU laid that pipe there, I know both the Danish and Germans laid sections of it in surrounding waters, and it was for EU consumption. What difference does it makes. Russia loses certain profit under question. Yes an immediate loss to it. They've shut off, and have had control over. Changing what. It was at diminished capacity under question. Those questions haven't changed. The EU doing it to themselves. They have anyway. No, the Americans, Nato perhaps. A technicality.
Attacking piping is an act of war in most situations. Except it's complicated if by chance it's attacking your own piping? What's the ownership? EU consumption, Russian grid, but the entire grid in which waters becomes questionable, if other nations funded or laid sections.
It gets more complicated when the entire pipeline shuts off.