The gas was at diminished capacity. Now it's still at diminished capacity. And the prices are only higher.
But you meant it's off from Russia. A matter of inevitably. It was already virtually impeded.
Who dunnit. Heavily patrolled Nato waters. Those waters aren't Russian and have increased activity during the current conflict. Off of sections that might have even been layed by the surrounding nations. You'd have to research it more, but there is quite remarkable if Russian subs had. UUVs perhaps. The buoys and sonar are everywhere there. Who profits, the people don't.
that’s what I mean why is it struck to the bottom of every conspiracy site. the less ppl talking about it the more sheep that will believe the false narrative is my guess.
Because it changes nothing. If by technicality the EU laid that pipe there, I know both the Danish and Germans laid sections of it in surrounding waters, and it was for EU consumption. What difference does it makes. Russia loses certain profit under question. Yes an immediate loss to it. They've shut off, and have had control over. Changing what. It was at diminished capacity under question. Those questions haven't changed. The EU doing it to themselves. They have anyway. No, the Americans, Nato perhaps. A technicality.
Attacking piping is an act of war in most situations. Except it's complicated if by chance it's attacking your own piping? What's the ownership? EU consumption, Russian grid, but the entire grid in which waters becomes questionable, if other nations funded or laid sections.
It gets more complicated when the entire pipeline shuts off.
What's the point the result was the same.
The gas was at diminished capacity. Now it's still at diminished capacity. And the prices are only higher.
But you meant it's off from Russia. A matter of inevitably. It was already virtually impeded.
Who dunnit. Heavily patrolled Nato waters. Those waters aren't Russian and have increased activity during the current conflict. Off of sections that might have even been layed by the surrounding nations. You'd have to research it more, but there is quite remarkable if Russian subs had. UUVs perhaps. The buoys and sonar are everywhere there. Who profits, the people don't.
that’s what I mean why is it struck to the bottom of every conspiracy site. the less ppl talking about it the more sheep that will believe the false narrative is my guess.
Because it changes nothing. If by technicality the EU laid that pipe there, I know both the Danish and Germans laid sections of it in surrounding waters, and it was for EU consumption. What difference does it makes. Russia loses certain profit under question. Yes an immediate loss to it. They've shut off, and have had control over. Changing what. It was at diminished capacity under question. Those questions haven't changed. The EU doing it to themselves. They have anyway. No, the Americans, Nato perhaps. A technicality.
Attacking piping is an act of war in most situations. Except it's complicated if by chance it's attacking your own piping? What's the ownership? EU consumption, Russian grid, but the entire grid in which waters becomes questionable, if other nations funded or laid sections.
It gets more complicated when the entire pipeline shuts off.