Uranium One - not 20% of uranium reserves. It's worse.
It was a deal to hand-over 20% the USA's production capacity to Putin.
More to the point:
A deal to hand-over uranium processing technologies, to Putin.
Hillary was masterful at that - finding ways to give USA tech to other countries.
ok so a transfer of uranium to putin - a known nuclear power / national threat
sure, why not.
i don't know, but also just the supply chain that feeds US uranium demand - why would any administration hand-over even 1% of the uranium processing supply chain to russia - if putin was considered a national threat.
and if he wasn't considered a national threat at the time.
what changed.
that's all i'm asking.
what changed from Uranium one... 12 / 24 / 36 months later... REEEEE PUTIN!
IDK. Why transfer manufacturing of semiconductors to Asia? Why transfer manufacturing of tools to Asia. Fuck, it is even sensless now to buy SnapOn wrench - it is made in China. Even fucking wrench. And you talk about uranium. They transferred out everything that produce real things and keep bankers, lawyers, pension advisors and stock traders, covering all that shit with Hollywood.
Total deindustrialisation of USA is going from 1980s and you ask why they sell Uranium One? Where you have been all that time? You should have become concerned when Motorola and Texas Instrumens outsoursed their chip manufacturing to Philipines/Malaysia/China/Taiwan.
We also have some kind of deindustrialisation in Russia, started from 1991, it is different in methods, but similar in goal. But every single Russian is totally aware about it and excluding those who get money participating in that shit, all blame the government for the treason.
Strange, that it is not the case for US.
and you talk about a wrench?? lol
so then what's the big deal of Russia selling gas to Germany, if Germany wants to buy?
is my point.
if it's not a big deal, then what's the big deal?
Ukraine is a money laundering operation, that they hope to stoke into WW3 - to usher in the great reset.
It's not about democracy or humanitarian anything.
It's not about Putin being dangerous.
It's about self-serving interests attempting to unify the money supply under one bank that controls them all.
Putin? hahah Putin is happy to play the court jester - as he watched the West self implode.
Is my point :)
To paint a picture of deindustrialisation trend.
Those stock traiders in US think they will loose money if they allow Germany to buy cheap gas.
Highly probable, yes.
However, I'm not shure about money laundering. What is the need for those, who print money to launder them? I think it is draining official state budget for whatever purpose. Look, you are feeded with all that stories about shortages, supply chain problems, explosions on different plants and so on. That Ian hurricane, draught, heavy rains, heat waves and so on. All that shit is the things government exists to mitigate and fix with taxpayers money. So, to slip from the responsibility of fixing some bigger preplanned disaster, they have to drain state budget as much as possible, and they they will just tell everybody that they don't have money to do their job, so you have to survive by yourself if you could.
They tried to get rid of you with chemical food, drugs, non-working virus, unneeded lockdowns and masks, shitty vaccines and so on. Now they praying for WW3 or some other manufactured disaster, but in both cases they have to spend collected taxpayers money to save you. So, they need to get rid of them, to have a reason for not saving you.