The more I think about everything going on, the more and more it has to be a bunch of disparate conspiracies or a few larger ones, but definitely they must be present for logical consistency.
The political factions of the g20 have pretty much been completely corrupted for years and everything they complain to fix they are usually systematically maintaining at the same time.
They don't ever seek anything which would appear like a step back...so they just have to bluff their way the entire time like a liar who refuses to admit the lie.
We are about to watch them attack the family unit again now that fall is here because that is when they can get the kids separated from their families in school, work gets busy for the parents, everyone is back from their vacations for the most part.
We are now going to get the classics such as 'crazy family members' and political family stuff...
Then we have the cooling economy.....purposefully engineered to fail....it must be a shear statistical anomaly that so many countries (g20) all suddenly have issues.....
Then you get local politics where they are all so greedy they don't bother to even dream for a second that they should be doing anything different from the guys before them.....
And corporate levels are either desperate and hungry and near death and have no time to care about the world at large, and you have multinational companies ensuring they maintain dominance even if it means wiping out entire markets...
--
Shortsighted is not even the beginning of it....this cannot possibly be a completely random occurrence. It has to be purposefully engineered.
--
Every major shooting is at a school, or coincidence is present at every single one.....
I would shoot up politicians, billionaires, etc....
Not children, and not so many times over and over throughout history.
Billionaires always go out through clear assassins or 'suicide' or a favourite of the celebrity class - overdose.....
Never shot at the dozens of events they apparently go to.....always something private
..
--- seems like if they want you dead, you can be killed.....if they want you to live you are pretty safe.... statistically speaking.
Then the law constantly defends the same broken issues.....let's be real....the people are usually complacent or complicit
--
Those who cry for change also tend to try and seize control....or build some form of facade of the current installation....to repeat the same?
Anyways. I wanted to rant because I am tired of this craziness....
I definitely enjoy the series. I cannot say I have seen the whole thing, probably 15-20 hours of it.
I find I tend to throw it on from time to time, but there is so much information I play the same portions over to remind myself some of the details, so I cannot be sure how much I have actually seen or rewatched.
The perceivable RECORD', verb [Latin recorder, to call to mind.] represents flowing inspiration; which requires one to resist the temptation of suggested information, like his-story; which tempts one to RE (respond) to MEMBER (memory) instead of adapting to the ongoing flow of inspiration.
Sleight of hand...the suggested symbolism for record (red dot); prominently displayed as the "bindu" on the forehead and of course to record enter-tame-mind.
Babbling on (suggested information over perceivable inspiration) stacks the tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] "confusion; disorder"; hence making the perceivable natural order (communicating inspiration) a mystery for those who ignore it for suggested information. And of course; whatever fiction (information) is being build, will collapse upon itself; while the foundation (inspiration) goes on, ready for the next attempt at building sandcastles at the beach.
Meanwhile; the few build something else...a little masonic work on free will of choice by means of suggested information to shape memories within willing minds...building walls; setting up armies for wars; illustrating his-story; narrating reality through fiction; expanding the minds of the ignorant with layers upon layers of distractions etc.
The only way (inception towards death) teaches those within (life) to resist; by inspiring them with the consequences of their ignorance. Choosing to resist grows resistance (living) within temptation (process of dying).
The few suggest "resistance is futile" to tempt the many to ignore what they perceive...resistance is fertile. The few suggest the many to want to resist "against" suggested as to tempt them to ignore being resistance within perceivable temptation "for" the sustenance of self.
We need to teach our kids that the surface explanation is not always the truth. That news is often false and it's planted to suit someone's purpose. So much news is either a coverup or it misses the real reasons for things, or it is given to slant things favorably for someone.
Agreed
Ive REALLY been trying to do this, but back to the "the conspiracy sounds too crazy to be true, so the person saying it sounds crazy saying it" paradox.
Why would the government kill people who pay them taxes and build things for them?
How do you answer a question you can't even understand? Some very important pieces are missing, and without them, the whole thing just sounds like a meth-fueled Phillip K Dick Novel. Which it may be?
The government(s) are tools subverted to the needs of the elite. Once the vaxes kill off many, the elite no longer need the governments, as they live elsewhere, and can let the collapsed nations crumble. It's like the story of the scorpion and the frog too. "The Scorpion and the Frog is an animal fable which teaches that vicious people cannot resist hurting others even when it is not in their own interests. "
***Russian nesting dolls enters the chat.
a) the few suggest SUR'FACE, noun - "exterior" to tempt the many to ignore INTE'RIOR, adjective [Latin inter or intra, in or within.] - "being within limits"; hence being temporary interior (living) within ongoing exterior (process of dying) aka free will of choice at the center of dominating balance (momentum of motion).
b) only if one ignores being within; would one suggest that something inside everything "is nothing".
c) what's the implication of making suggestions about "always" while being temporary? What if suggested "always" tempts one to ignore "all way", hence being one within all aka variation within continuity?
Mr. word salad
How about this...are you at the surface (exterior) of a suggested planet or are you within (interior) perceivable reality? If both; then what comes first?
I was always very confused, grasping for truths. Then I eventually began to fully understand the jQ, and satan's hand working each one of his foot soldiers like a kosher meat puppet. Now I know the truth; Christ is king, and His kingdom is only one you need to concern yourself with
it really is the case.
normies who think they're smarter than everyone else will dick-measure each other over "ideas" as to why things are bad. they always dancing around endless assumptions but they never want to acknowledge the world is corrupt by design; they still believe things are honest and "logical" with regards to human nature, human society, etc.
I feel like even when they 'acknowledge' the fact, they immediately shutdown and lose all capacity to critically think or to even attempt a creative solution, hell even a solution. Most just accept it without really having comprehended it.
I call it the "nod and smile" response to traumatic ideas. They just turn off and nod and smile so they do not need to suffer the trauma from trying to understand the actual consequences of the situation.
--
They usually fall into major fallacies such as thinking they can get politicians to fix the issue, or why don't you "run for office" like a peon can actually make a difference....and they already break the logical flow from the previous 'acknowledgement' that the world is corrupt....so how can I run without being corrupted or being in the club already?
Yeah, I agree. I am thinking everyday how to reconcile this conundrum though... Because those same people see just as "stupid, crazy, propagandised" from their point of view when these discussions get brought up; the absurdly strong messaging of "fighting misinformation" is being pushed on all sides.
--
i do understand that people have to have the desire to actively look into conspiracy theories in order to actually be open to them.... just us telling others directly is usually met with conflict or ignored altogether. hence the conundrum. all we can do probably is just slip in comments that would raise questions, if and they have the sense they'd go looking into it to confirm or try to disprove a conspiracy theory, or to try and prove their solutions will work.
--
i have tried the direct approach and its failed. so i don't care what happens to those people now. information is out there. if people get caught blind by hardship when some of these conspiracies come to fruition, it's on them for not making the effort
I agree. I think the best way is to raise their sense of curiosity and pique their interesta without the PTBarnum act of getting them excited.
They will be excited if they are to have any chance of finding truths and going for a dive.
It should be on us to be as sages and propose quandaries for them to pick at, rather than give answers as those will be cast aside in favour of simpler truths.
What if the temporary (living) express (growth) or repress (loss) inside solution (process of dying)...depending on choice of reaction?
a) what if those (living) within the world are temporary corrupted by the ongoing natural order (process of dying) of the world; hence in need to resist (growth) temptation (loss); yet also having the choice to want to ignore it?
b) CORRUPT (to break, separate or dissolve) -ATION (through action). What if reaction (living) represents the self differentiation of enacting (process of dying)? What if the partial (life) is being broken; separated; dissolved within the whole (inception towards death)? What if the ongoing natural order (dying) causes temporary chaos (living) within itself? What if the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death) causes a formed (life) response (choice)?
What if the few suggest DESIGN, verb - "to delineate form by drawing the outline" to tempt the many to ignore being the delineated form within (living) the outer line (process of dying)?
Shit has always been this way or worse. Welcome to existence with human civilization
Then why would i want to be here?
That's a great question. I participate with society to earn money so I can save up and have a nice cabin by a lake or river in the country with land, tools, and some toys. I believe I'll get there faster by trading my math skills for income. Aside from that, I keep to myself.
I think most people would have been better off had they learned how to homestead in communities while growing up instead of the garbage we call education and the pathetic jobs most people do living paycheck to paycheck. I can't name a single professional that enjoys life after a few years of doing it and they are high earners. Either you're life will suck as a low income earner or it will suck as a high income earner. At least with high income, you can depart from society at an earlier age if you save.
Yep. Money means nothing and given the choice, i would choose poor. More authenticity with those you come to befriend is enough of a selling point to me. The rich stab each other in the back at every turn. Destruction of the whole planet would be a bad thing? Sometime, somewhere, we will be back in existence and oppressed in another place or whatever this shit is. Can't wait!
I wanted to comment on and amplify just the title of your post. What I have found is that everyone lives in their own "reality", which is of their own choosing and always at some distance to the final, objective reality.
I'm still crystallizing my thoughts on this, but there are three very substantial blocks which prevent each individual's reality from matching objective reality (leaving out any practical or theoretical limitations):
Imagination. No one will be able to discover or to accept something as true if they simply cannot imagine it is true.
Ego. Who people have decided that they are and what their place is in the Universe are both extremely important to them and also quite fragile. They will actively reject knowledge which threatens this.
Self-preservation. If someone subconsciously finds that certain knowledge indicates a world with which they do not have the necessary abilities to cope, that knowledge will also be rejected in favor of that which returns them to a comfortable state.
The last is the most unfamiliar and hardest to understand. To illustrate: your conscious mind knows you aren't going to fall out at the top of the roller coaster, but your subconscious does not. It alerts you by making you very frightened. The effect lasts for just a second or two on the ride, but you couldn't possibly live your life in that condition.
Isn't #3 referred to as "cognitive dissonance"? I have come to these same conclusions basically but could never be nearly as articulate. Also there is the influence of parents through life, but seemingly they have found a way to disconnect that. How many kids begged for the COVID vax despite the obvious dangers that were just under the surface of the propaganda being pushed? And thats just it. Five minutes of digging into EVERY SINGLE THING THEY SAID proves they weren't being wholly truthful at any turn. Its like they stopped every sentence halfway through. Maddening.
I've come to the conclusion that "They" invented and popularized the concept of "cognitive dissonance" in order to obscure the starker truth, and derail and divert people with a confusing and far less alarming version of it.
Regrettably, They are using the same technique while we speak, informing us plebs exactly why athletes and children and TV presenters and the recently vaxxed are "suddenly dying". The reasons are many and obvious: napping, climate change, winter vagina, etc. Well, thank Goddess "scientists" are around to explain this to us, eh?
So take a look at the "cognitive dissonance" wiki. Why does this phenomenon of subtle psychological pressure deserve such a long and involved write-up with so many big words? You can see right in the first paragraph how they're going to try to soft pedal this into irrelevance:
Oh, well, too bad for those rare individuals experiencing this discomfort, right? But as far as I can tell, it's the condition that the overwhelming majority of the population lives in all the time, and it controls their lives and thus all the rest of us. This "discomfort" causes them--as you have observed--to reject plain facts outright, and to make up absurd "truths" right out of thin air. "TDS" is also a prime example.
Then there's the meta-analysis of this phenomenon, which is that virtually no one notices all this going on.
I definitely agree that people have some very real blocks to overcome. Even myself. I am looking for new information, but I have to constantly analyze whether it is accurate, useful, and worth retaining, then find a place to store it and interconnect it with previous data.
The fear is also building your castle of sand, at least for me when it comes to the possibility of living a lie in some way always keeps me seeking for some truth, but perhaps I am really just running from it?
Yeah, I really think you're thinking along the lines of what I was trying to get across.
There are all kinds of books and entire college courses and innumerable videos about critical thinking and how to discern the truth, etc, etc. But as fraught and troublesome as that may be, it's made incalculably easier to confront because we perceive it right in front of us with our conscious mind.
Those other blocks that I was describing are made so problematic because they stem from the subconscious, and so perfidious because you will find--or if necessary create--a very good reason for rejecting the truth. It's not the real reason, but to your own mind it will seem very good.
I've collected stacks and stacks of evidence for what I think are very important truths, but when I even hint at these things people run like cats from an exploding pack of firecrackers. Trust me, I never suspected this was the way the human mind really works.
So yes, if you find yourself running from some "obviously ridiculous" claim, stop and take a look back, and make sure you can identify and articulate precisely why it's so "obviously ridiculous".
I used to always hate when people said, "The real journey is the journey of self-discovery." Welp, now I hate to admit that that hippie platitude was right.
Yeah, it really became apparent to me years ago that a lot of these platitudes are truths...but only when you realise them, and the platitudes themselves are merely abstractions of the truth and so they cannot really open the eyes of people, but we have no other ways of doing so, and platitudes are our attempts at conveying the wisdom we have learned.
Consider whole perceivable reality and partial comprehension thereof, based on choice of adaptation to either perceivable (inspiration) or suggested (information).
a) from the perspective of the center; hence being able to perceive (partial) within perceivable (whole); thereby having the opportunity to grow lack of comprehension.
b) what one perceives represents the subjects (living) within the momentum of objectifying (process of dying). One cannot perceive the objectifying; only grow comprehension thereof by adaptation to inspiration (moving subjects perceived).
The few suggest crystals (solid form) to tempt the many to ignore the flow of inspiration. Struggle to discern being subjected by; then allow the mind to adapt to the perceivable inspiration from all the other moving subjects...that's how one taps the objectifying flow. Others can only suggest you what is being shaped out of source; you need to tap the source to shape yourself.
In short...resist the temptation to want to crystalize thought and instead let go of affixed thoughts (information) as to be able to draw from the ongoing (inspiration). Whatever you need to be is being supplied by origin; while your wants tempt you to ignore this. This system (energy aka internal power) sustains itself through the struggle of those within; while inspiring to struggle requires constant temptation.
Others tempt you to struggle for suggested outcomes; you need to struggle for sustenance within perceivable origin.
...if "one" chooses to count what others are suggesting.
Living represents the substance within the process of dying (exterior) and it ain't blocked; it's being pushed forwards. Ignoring the perceivable flow-state (inspiration) blocks one within suggested information; upheld within memory (mind)...yet that doesn't block the process of dying; it corrupts the living.
The objectifying (process of dying) is killing the subjects (living); resonating with the status quo implies resisting the temptation thereof. This resistance represents the temporary growth (living) within the ongoing loss (process of dying). One can only be alive while dying...acceptance demands struggle to stay alive; while ignorance tempts with dying. Others dress up dying with suggested alternatives (future; making it; heaven; hell; paradise; absolution; infinity and beyond; final rest; end of struggle; order out of chaos and so on).
Does everything perceivable require acceptance? Does refusal of everything perceivable make it not perceivable? What if one is just easily tempted to ignore demanded adaptation (need) to everything already perceivable for whatever others suggest one to accept (want) or refuse (not want)?
Shaped temporarily out of suggested information within ones memory; while ignoring to adapt to perceivable inspiration. Consenting to suggested words shape the branded ego, others suggest egotism to rebrand it with words (good goy; brave goy; have another medal; goy; be a hero; goy; show your pride; goy).
The struggle to sustain life; ignored for the temptation of dying; while others suggest narratives which distract from dying (how about some enter-tame-mind; goys?).
Those who try to resist are murdered
And discredited with lies about drugs or pedo-involvement or something. Murder isn't enough. That makes them a martyr and validates them. Can't have that, so overdose.
Yeah and suicided
a) a perceivable moving system doesn't require the suggestions of those within to be consistent. Consenting to any suggestions represents inconsistency in ignorance of perceivable consistency.
b) Logic aka reasoning represents the conflict over suggested information (inconsistency); hence a division by suggestion from perceivable consistency. One doesn't need to reason with others about breathing; quenching thirst; stilling hunger; sheltering...one needs to adapt to being moved by a perceivable system.
Take all the humans away...what would you reason about; who would you reason over with; what could be illogical in a world where nobody suggests you logic?
What would your senses perceive if others couldn't suggest you that "no; not; nothing; nothingness" existed? How can there be nothing within everything reality has to offer?
THE'ORY, noun [Latin theoria; Greek; to see or contemplate.] aka contemplation about perceivable...not reasoning about suggested (information); while ignoring perceivable (inspiration).
CON- (together with; hence within) TEMP (temporary within ongoing) -ATION (through action; hence reaction). There's also TEMPLATE in there aka TEMPLE (a vessel for shaping a piece of work)...that represents oneself; the formed vessel (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka the partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable) work (energy).
Theory represents the perceivable status quo for temporary living within the ongoing process of dying; while the suggested inversion thereof represents "fact; certainty; truth". A moving system doesn't communicate facts, but a flow-state of inspiration for constant adaption. A moving system isn't unquestionable (certain); but tempts those within to question everything; hence all the uncertainty by those lacking self discernment. A moving system contradicts every truth suggested into a lie by simply moving on.
There ya have it...a suggested FACT-ion; corrupted by a moving system. A suggested fact which you also believe to represent a "complete" state; which tempts you to ignore that everything you perceive represents a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying).
There ain't no facts in motion; yet there's the constant temptation through being moved to suggest "facts" in a desperate attempt to hold onto the temporary within the ongoing.
If living represents truth; then dying proves it to be a lie. If one comprehends that living implies dying; then any suggested truth by the living represents a contradiction within perceivable motion, and their death will prove them liars. How tempting is it for liars to keep suggesting truths; when only death represents the proof of their lies?
Now let's take suggestion out of the context...suddenly "truth"; "lies" and "proofs" disappear and only perceivable "change" remains aka moving differences aka inspiration for adaptation. Yet; how to prevent suggestion within context? Well; by first comprehending the differences between suggested text and perceivable TEXT, noun [Latin textus, woven]; hence being interwoven within perceivable inspiration; while being tempted by suggested information.
Suggested text (words) represent the vector for the vampire at the doorstep into your memory; waiting for your consent to let it in, after which you view the perceivable reality (sound) through the lens of suggested fiction (words). In "They Live", the struggle suggested is aimed against another to put the lens on; which represents the suggested inversion of perceivable reality; where the struggle of each one represents taking the lens (suggested information) off, as to be able to have eyes to see aka being the "ALL seeing I" within perceivable inspiration.
The suggested laws of men defend the willing self destruction of the many; who ignore being resistance (living) within the natural order (process of dying). The behavior of flow (inception towards death) represents the natural law for form (life); hence justice representing that which "just is"; not that which others suggest it to be.
You exists within the constant law; while struggling to resist the temptation of it. Others suggest you laws (rules of behavior) as to a) tempt you to ignore resisting and b) to domesticate your free will of choice; and c) curtail your potential to grow. If you consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need); then you fuck yourself; which allows others to fuck you at will.
Change implies forwards. To be implies within what moves forwards. For those within change; suggested outcomes represent the temptation to ignore resisting the origin, which moves one towards outcome. Others exploit the ignorance of origin by suggesting outcomes.
Example...a simple suggested branding for "change" from perceivable "towards death" to suggested "till infinity and beyond" represents enough temptation to trick one to follow suggestions; while ignoring perceivable.