The more I think about everything going on, the more and more it has to be a bunch of disparate conspiracies or a few larger ones, but definitely they must be present for logical consistency.
The political factions of the g20 have pretty much been completely corrupted for years and everything they complain to fix they are usually systematically maintaining at the same time.
They don't ever seek anything which would appear like a step back...so they just have to bluff their way the entire time like a liar who refuses to admit the lie.
We are about to watch them attack the family unit again now that fall is here because that is when they can get the kids separated from their families in school, work gets busy for the parents, everyone is back from their vacations for the most part.
We are now going to get the classics such as 'crazy family members' and political family stuff...
Then we have the cooling economy.....purposefully engineered to fail....it must be a shear statistical anomaly that so many countries (g20) all suddenly have issues.....
Then you get local politics where they are all so greedy they don't bother to even dream for a second that they should be doing anything different from the guys before them.....
And corporate levels are either desperate and hungry and near death and have no time to care about the world at large, and you have multinational companies ensuring they maintain dominance even if it means wiping out entire markets...
--
Shortsighted is not even the beginning of it....this cannot possibly be a completely random occurrence. It has to be purposefully engineered.
--
Every major shooting is at a school, or coincidence is present at every single one.....
I would shoot up politicians, billionaires, etc....
Not children, and not so many times over and over throughout history.
Billionaires always go out through clear assassins or 'suicide' or a favourite of the celebrity class - overdose.....
Never shot at the dozens of events they apparently go to.....always something private
..
--- seems like if they want you dead, you can be killed.....if they want you to live you are pretty safe.... statistically speaking.
Then the law constantly defends the same broken issues.....let's be real....the people are usually complacent or complicit
--
Those who cry for change also tend to try and seize control....or build some form of facade of the current installation....to repeat the same?
Anyways. I wanted to rant because I am tired of this craziness....
Consider whole perceivable reality and partial comprehension thereof, based on choice of adaptation to either perceivable (inspiration) or suggested (information).
a) from the perspective of the center; hence being able to perceive (partial) within perceivable (whole); thereby having the opportunity to grow lack of comprehension.
b) what one perceives represents the subjects (living) within the momentum of objectifying (process of dying). One cannot perceive the objectifying; only grow comprehension thereof by adaptation to inspiration (moving subjects perceived).
The few suggest crystals (solid form) to tempt the many to ignore the flow of inspiration. Struggle to discern being subjected by; then allow the mind to adapt to the perceivable inspiration from all the other moving subjects...that's how one taps the objectifying flow. Others can only suggest you what is being shaped out of source; you need to tap the source to shape yourself.
In short...resist the temptation to want to crystalize thought and instead let go of affixed thoughts (information) as to be able to draw from the ongoing (inspiration). Whatever you need to be is being supplied by origin; while your wants tempt you to ignore this. This system (energy aka internal power) sustains itself through the struggle of those within; while inspiring to struggle requires constant temptation.
Others tempt you to struggle for suggested outcomes; you need to struggle for sustenance within perceivable origin.
...if "one" chooses to count what others are suggesting.
Living represents the substance within the process of dying (exterior) and it ain't blocked; it's being pushed forwards. Ignoring the perceivable flow-state (inspiration) blocks one within suggested information; upheld within memory (mind)...yet that doesn't block the process of dying; it corrupts the living.
The objectifying (process of dying) is killing the subjects (living); resonating with the status quo implies resisting the temptation thereof. This resistance represents the temporary growth (living) within the ongoing loss (process of dying). One can only be alive while dying...acceptance demands struggle to stay alive; while ignorance tempts with dying. Others dress up dying with suggested alternatives (future; making it; heaven; hell; paradise; absolution; infinity and beyond; final rest; end of struggle; order out of chaos and so on).
Does everything perceivable require acceptance? Does refusal of everything perceivable make it not perceivable? What if one is just easily tempted to ignore demanded adaptation (need) to everything already perceivable for whatever others suggest one to accept (want) or refuse (not want)?
Shaped temporarily out of suggested information within ones memory; while ignoring to adapt to perceivable inspiration. Consenting to suggested words shape the branded ego, others suggest egotism to rebrand it with words (good goy; brave goy; have another medal; goy; be a hero; goy; show your pride; goy).
The struggle to sustain life; ignored for the temptation of dying; while others suggest narratives which distract from dying (how about some enter-tame-mind; goys?).