The more I think about everything going on, the more and more it has to be a bunch of disparate conspiracies or a few larger ones, but definitely they must be present for logical consistency.
The political factions of the g20 have pretty much been completely corrupted for years and everything they complain to fix they are usually systematically maintaining at the same time.
They don't ever seek anything which would appear like a step back...so they just have to bluff their way the entire time like a liar who refuses to admit the lie.
We are about to watch them attack the family unit again now that fall is here because that is when they can get the kids separated from their families in school, work gets busy for the parents, everyone is back from their vacations for the most part.
We are now going to get the classics such as 'crazy family members' and political family stuff...
Then we have the cooling economy.....purposefully engineered to fail....it must be a shear statistical anomaly that so many countries (g20) all suddenly have issues.....
Then you get local politics where they are all so greedy they don't bother to even dream for a second that they should be doing anything different from the guys before them.....
And corporate levels are either desperate and hungry and near death and have no time to care about the world at large, and you have multinational companies ensuring they maintain dominance even if it means wiping out entire markets...
--
Shortsighted is not even the beginning of it....this cannot possibly be a completely random occurrence. It has to be purposefully engineered.
--
Every major shooting is at a school, or coincidence is present at every single one.....
I would shoot up politicians, billionaires, etc....
Not children, and not so many times over and over throughout history.
Billionaires always go out through clear assassins or 'suicide' or a favourite of the celebrity class - overdose.....
Never shot at the dozens of events they apparently go to.....always something private
..
--- seems like if they want you dead, you can be killed.....if they want you to live you are pretty safe.... statistically speaking.
Then the law constantly defends the same broken issues.....let's be real....the people are usually complacent or complicit
--
Those who cry for change also tend to try and seize control....or build some form of facade of the current installation....to repeat the same?
Anyways. I wanted to rant because I am tired of this craziness....
I wanted to comment on and amplify just the title of your post. What I have found is that everyone lives in their own "reality", which is of their own choosing and always at some distance to the final, objective reality.
I'm still crystallizing my thoughts on this, but there are three very substantial blocks which prevent each individual's reality from matching objective reality (leaving out any practical or theoretical limitations):
Imagination. No one will be able to discover or to accept something as true if they simply cannot imagine it is true.
Ego. Who people have decided that they are and what their place is in the Universe are both extremely important to them and also quite fragile. They will actively reject knowledge which threatens this.
Self-preservation. If someone subconsciously finds that certain knowledge indicates a world with which they do not have the necessary abilities to cope, that knowledge will also be rejected in favor of that which returns them to a comfortable state.
The last is the most unfamiliar and hardest to understand. To illustrate: your conscious mind knows you aren't going to fall out at the top of the roller coaster, but your subconscious does not. It alerts you by making you very frightened. The effect lasts for just a second or two on the ride, but you couldn't possibly live your life in that condition.
Isn't #3 referred to as "cognitive dissonance"? I have come to these same conclusions basically but could never be nearly as articulate. Also there is the influence of parents through life, but seemingly they have found a way to disconnect that. How many kids begged for the COVID vax despite the obvious dangers that were just under the surface of the propaganda being pushed? And thats just it. Five minutes of digging into EVERY SINGLE THING THEY SAID proves they weren't being wholly truthful at any turn. Its like they stopped every sentence halfway through. Maddening.
I've come to the conclusion that "They" invented and popularized the concept of "cognitive dissonance" in order to obscure the starker truth, and derail and divert people with a confusing and far less alarming version of it.
Regrettably, They are using the same technique while we speak, informing us plebs exactly why athletes and children and TV presenters and the recently vaxxed are "suddenly dying". The reasons are many and obvious: napping, climate change, winter vagina, etc. Well, thank Goddess "scientists" are around to explain this to us, eh?
So take a look at the "cognitive dissonance" wiki. Why does this phenomenon of subtle psychological pressure deserve such a long and involved write-up with so many big words? You can see right in the first paragraph how they're going to try to soft pedal this into irrelevance:
Oh, well, too bad for those rare individuals experiencing this discomfort, right? But as far as I can tell, it's the condition that the overwhelming majority of the population lives in all the time, and it controls their lives and thus all the rest of us. This "discomfort" causes them--as you have observed--to reject plain facts outright, and to make up absurd "truths" right out of thin air. "TDS" is also a prime example.
Then there's the meta-analysis of this phenomenon, which is that virtually no one notices all this going on.
I definitely agree that people have some very real blocks to overcome. Even myself. I am looking for new information, but I have to constantly analyze whether it is accurate, useful, and worth retaining, then find a place to store it and interconnect it with previous data.
The fear is also building your castle of sand, at least for me when it comes to the possibility of living a lie in some way always keeps me seeking for some truth, but perhaps I am really just running from it?
Yeah, I really think you're thinking along the lines of what I was trying to get across.
There are all kinds of books and entire college courses and innumerable videos about critical thinking and how to discern the truth, etc, etc. But as fraught and troublesome as that may be, it's made incalculably easier to confront because we perceive it right in front of us with our conscious mind.
Those other blocks that I was describing are made so problematic because they stem from the subconscious, and so perfidious because you will find--or if necessary create--a very good reason for rejecting the truth. It's not the real reason, but to your own mind it will seem very good.
I've collected stacks and stacks of evidence for what I think are very important truths, but when I even hint at these things people run like cats from an exploding pack of firecrackers. Trust me, I never suspected this was the way the human mind really works.
So yes, if you find yourself running from some "obviously ridiculous" claim, stop and take a look back, and make sure you can identify and articulate precisely why it's so "obviously ridiculous".
I used to always hate when people said, "The real journey is the journey of self-discovery." Welp, now I hate to admit that that hippie platitude was right.
Yeah, it really became apparent to me years ago that a lot of these platitudes are truths...but only when you realise them, and the platitudes themselves are merely abstractions of the truth and so they cannot really open the eyes of people, but we have no other ways of doing so, and platitudes are our attempts at conveying the wisdom we have learned.
Consider whole perceivable reality and partial comprehension thereof, based on choice of adaptation to either perceivable (inspiration) or suggested (information).
a) from the perspective of the center; hence being able to perceive (partial) within perceivable (whole); thereby having the opportunity to grow lack of comprehension.
b) what one perceives represents the subjects (living) within the momentum of objectifying (process of dying). One cannot perceive the objectifying; only grow comprehension thereof by adaptation to inspiration (moving subjects perceived).
The few suggest crystals (solid form) to tempt the many to ignore the flow of inspiration. Struggle to discern being subjected by; then allow the mind to adapt to the perceivable inspiration from all the other moving subjects...that's how one taps the objectifying flow. Others can only suggest you what is being shaped out of source; you need to tap the source to shape yourself.
In short...resist the temptation to want to crystalize thought and instead let go of affixed thoughts (information) as to be able to draw from the ongoing (inspiration). Whatever you need to be is being supplied by origin; while your wants tempt you to ignore this. This system (energy aka internal power) sustains itself through the struggle of those within; while inspiring to struggle requires constant temptation.
Others tempt you to struggle for suggested outcomes; you need to struggle for sustenance within perceivable origin.
...if "one" chooses to count what others are suggesting.
Living represents the substance within the process of dying (exterior) and it ain't blocked; it's being pushed forwards. Ignoring the perceivable flow-state (inspiration) blocks one within suggested information; upheld within memory (mind)...yet that doesn't block the process of dying; it corrupts the living.
The objectifying (process of dying) is killing the subjects (living); resonating with the status quo implies resisting the temptation thereof. This resistance represents the temporary growth (living) within the ongoing loss (process of dying). One can only be alive while dying...acceptance demands struggle to stay alive; while ignorance tempts with dying. Others dress up dying with suggested alternatives (future; making it; heaven; hell; paradise; absolution; infinity and beyond; final rest; end of struggle; order out of chaos and so on).
Does everything perceivable require acceptance? Does refusal of everything perceivable make it not perceivable? What if one is just easily tempted to ignore demanded adaptation (need) to everything already perceivable for whatever others suggest one to accept (want) or refuse (not want)?
Shaped temporarily out of suggested information within ones memory; while ignoring to adapt to perceivable inspiration. Consenting to suggested words shape the branded ego, others suggest egotism to rebrand it with words (good goy; brave goy; have another medal; goy; be a hero; goy; show your pride; goy).
The struggle to sustain life; ignored for the temptation of dying; while others suggest narratives which distract from dying (how about some enter-tame-mind; goys?).