The more I think about everything going on, the more and more it has to be a bunch of disparate conspiracies or a few larger ones, but definitely they must be present for logical consistency.
The political factions of the g20 have pretty much been completely corrupted for years and everything they complain to fix they are usually systematically maintaining at the same time.
They don't ever seek anything which would appear like a step back...so they just have to bluff their way the entire time like a liar who refuses to admit the lie.
We are about to watch them attack the family unit again now that fall is here because that is when they can get the kids separated from their families in school, work gets busy for the parents, everyone is back from their vacations for the most part.
We are now going to get the classics such as 'crazy family members' and political family stuff...
Then we have the cooling economy.....purposefully engineered to fail....it must be a shear statistical anomaly that so many countries (g20) all suddenly have issues.....
Then you get local politics where they are all so greedy they don't bother to even dream for a second that they should be doing anything different from the guys before them.....
And corporate levels are either desperate and hungry and near death and have no time to care about the world at large, and you have multinational companies ensuring they maintain dominance even if it means wiping out entire markets...
--
Shortsighted is not even the beginning of it....this cannot possibly be a completely random occurrence. It has to be purposefully engineered.
--
Every major shooting is at a school, or coincidence is present at every single one.....
I would shoot up politicians, billionaires, etc....
Not children, and not so many times over and over throughout history.
Billionaires always go out through clear assassins or 'suicide' or a favourite of the celebrity class - overdose.....
Never shot at the dozens of events they apparently go to.....always something private
..
--- seems like if they want you dead, you can be killed.....if they want you to live you are pretty safe.... statistically speaking.
Then the law constantly defends the same broken issues.....let's be real....the people are usually complacent or complicit
--
Those who cry for change also tend to try and seize control....or build some form of facade of the current installation....to repeat the same?
Anyways. I wanted to rant because I am tired of this craziness....
a) a perceivable moving system doesn't require the suggestions of those within to be consistent. Consenting to any suggestions represents inconsistency in ignorance of perceivable consistency.
b) Logic aka reasoning represents the conflict over suggested information (inconsistency); hence a division by suggestion from perceivable consistency. One doesn't need to reason with others about breathing; quenching thirst; stilling hunger; sheltering...one needs to adapt to being moved by a perceivable system.
Take all the humans away...what would you reason about; who would you reason over with; what could be illogical in a world where nobody suggests you logic?
What would your senses perceive if others couldn't suggest you that "no; not; nothing; nothingness" existed? How can there be nothing within everything reality has to offer?
THE'ORY, noun [Latin theoria; Greek; to see or contemplate.] aka contemplation about perceivable...not reasoning about suggested (information); while ignoring perceivable (inspiration).
CON- (together with; hence within) TEMP (temporary within ongoing) -ATION (through action; hence reaction). There's also TEMPLATE in there aka TEMPLE (a vessel for shaping a piece of work)...that represents oneself; the formed vessel (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka the partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable) work (energy).
Theory represents the perceivable status quo for temporary living within the ongoing process of dying; while the suggested inversion thereof represents "fact; certainty; truth". A moving system doesn't communicate facts, but a flow-state of inspiration for constant adaption. A moving system isn't unquestionable (certain); but tempts those within to question everything; hence all the uncertainty by those lacking self discernment. A moving system contradicts every truth suggested into a lie by simply moving on.
There ya have it...a suggested FACT-ion; corrupted by a moving system. A suggested fact which you also believe to represent a "complete" state; which tempts you to ignore that everything you perceive represents a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying).
There ain't no facts in motion; yet there's the constant temptation through being moved to suggest "facts" in a desperate attempt to hold onto the temporary within the ongoing.
If living represents truth; then dying proves it to be a lie. If one comprehends that living implies dying; then any suggested truth by the living represents a contradiction within perceivable motion, and their death will prove them liars. How tempting is it for liars to keep suggesting truths; when only death represents the proof of their lies?
Now let's take suggestion out of the context...suddenly "truth"; "lies" and "proofs" disappear and only perceivable "change" remains aka moving differences aka inspiration for adaptation. Yet; how to prevent suggestion within context? Well; by first comprehending the differences between suggested text and perceivable TEXT, noun [Latin textus, woven]; hence being interwoven within perceivable inspiration; while being tempted by suggested information.
Suggested text (words) represent the vector for the vampire at the doorstep into your memory; waiting for your consent to let it in, after which you view the perceivable reality (sound) through the lens of suggested fiction (words). In "They Live", the struggle suggested is aimed against another to put the lens on; which represents the suggested inversion of perceivable reality; where the struggle of each one represents taking the lens (suggested information) off, as to be able to have eyes to see aka being the "ALL seeing I" within perceivable inspiration.
The suggested laws of men defend the willing self destruction of the many; who ignore being resistance (living) within the natural order (process of dying). The behavior of flow (inception towards death) represents the natural law for form (life); hence justice representing that which "just is"; not that which others suggest it to be.
You exists within the constant law; while struggling to resist the temptation of it. Others suggest you laws (rules of behavior) as to a) tempt you to ignore resisting and b) to domesticate your free will of choice; and c) curtail your potential to grow. If you consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need); then you fuck yourself; which allows others to fuck you at will.
Change implies forwards. To be implies within what moves forwards. For those within change; suggested outcomes represent the temptation to ignore resisting the origin, which moves one towards outcome. Others exploit the ignorance of origin by suggesting outcomes.
Example...a simple suggested branding for "change" from perceivable "towards death" to suggested "till infinity and beyond" represents enough temptation to trick one to follow suggestions; while ignoring perceivable.