Long exposure time for those old large format photos, so moving objects are blurred out of existence. This is also why the skies are mostly white (vs shades of gray). The exposure reached whiteout.
I watched a bit but skipped around. The fact that the guy doesn't acknowledge the long exposure seems important. Also, medieval buildings seem to have been even more grand without taking care of paved streets first. It is compelling to see the complexity and craftsmanship but don't know if it's evidence enough. Also different cameras take different times to expose. A small camera with larger aperture will capture people. A full format one today with a small aperture and low iso won't. Except for that horse we see tied to a carriage. I didn't ser the part about 1st floors underground but if the lights are on and they are exposing for the rest of the building, the floor with the lights will ghost out.
I might come around to it. Sometimes things take time. My great grandma was born 1893. I spent a lot of time with her when I was young. She spent time with her grandma. I feel like I would've heard something if the world had different technology back then or if things were radically different. Maybe there is something to the theory and little by little the truth will come out.
And they talk a lot about how San Francisco went from having like no buildings in 1850 to suddenly having 3 big churches and more than 1000 buildings built by 1859, they made a really big deal about how the numbers and how improbable they were. Just reminded me of this post/conspiracy.
Almost every time I go to the big city it is empty of people. And actually, iirc, the ton would usually only spend the Season in London and go to their estates for the rest of the time.
I don't know the answers to everything. But I do know that generations have been getting more stupid and we have lost a great deal of skill.
Master craftsmanship would take a lifetime to learn and they would have been geniuses like Leonardo.
As we increased tech, we chose function over form.... and ended up with neither.
In some ways, I think this may be a psyop against Europeans, like we couldn't have built this.. well, we could have. If not us then who? Africa? Aliens/demons? Previous civilizations? It is entirely possible (and likely) that the French didn't build or invent anything, of course.
However, the architecture in the colonies was influenced/created by Great Britain. For example, they would have expert cartographers (skills now lost) make a map of the new land. They would send the info back to GB via ships. The British would then design entire towns. The design schematics would be sent back to the new world to be built.
William Shakespeare is known for being born and buried in Stratford-upon-Avon. So the British decided to create a theater town and call it Stratford in Canada.
Unfortunately, the design got switched with that of a different city on the way over (they had one job!) And the British on the ground built the wrong design. That is why the other city looks like a theater town instead.
You will notice that in pretty much every British colony they have the same names for streets and cities.
Things can change rapidly. There used to be a country called Rhodesia that the British created and was destroyed.
On the other hand, if most info today is fake, probably most of history is too.
Also, if you around, you can see farmer's walls hand built out of stone. That would be a feat impossible for the men of today.
https://archive.ph/qiUyU
Modern men have significantly decreased testosterone, strength, grip strength, and fertility from just the last couple generations.
The Victorian people could have been twice as strong, more intelligent, and more driven to create. Look what Germany built in just a few years in the 1930s. From the sick man of Europe to a prosperous economic miracle.
i'm fairly certain by now that the vast majority of history is 100% fake.
Is anything real anymore?
Long exposure time for those old large format photos, so moving objects are blurred out of existence. This is also why the skies are mostly white (vs shades of gray). The exposure reached whiteout.
yup, long exposure to expose the film.
Look into how camera film works, especially early cameras.
go out onto the streets of manhattan on christmas morning.
empty.
whaaaaaat?! there are no people in 2022!!!
Dude, modern day New York City is FAKE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pXK1xMquKI
Long exposure = no people. No person will stay standing long enough to be captured on film.
What do you mean? Try a 2 minute exposure and see what turns up. Only those things that don't move.
I watched a bit but skipped around. The fact that the guy doesn't acknowledge the long exposure seems important. Also, medieval buildings seem to have been even more grand without taking care of paved streets first. It is compelling to see the complexity and craftsmanship but don't know if it's evidence enough. Also different cameras take different times to expose. A small camera with larger aperture will capture people. A full format one today with a small aperture and low iso won't. Except for that horse we see tied to a carriage. I didn't ser the part about 1st floors underground but if the lights are on and they are exposing for the rest of the building, the floor with the lights will ghost out.
I might come around to it. Sometimes things take time. My great grandma was born 1893. I spent a lot of time with her when I was young. She spent time with her grandma. I feel like I would've heard something if the world had different technology back then or if things were radically different. Maybe there is something to the theory and little by little the truth will come out.
So any counterpoint or just lol no?
Nobody wants to talk about this. Dont know why. Looks more like a screaming ass FE thread. I think Stolen history is crazy interesting.
I watched the video in this post:
https://conspiracies.win/p/15JmxNFkMH/anytime-youtube-fs-w-my-ytdlp-do/
And they talk a lot about how San Francisco went from having like no buildings in 1850 to suddenly having 3 big churches and more than 1000 buildings built by 1859, they made a really big deal about how the numbers and how improbable they were. Just reminded me of this post/conspiracy.
You know there was a gold rush going on, right? An absolute shitload of people went West in the 1850s to try and get rich.
Almost every time I go to the big city it is empty of people. And actually, iirc, the ton would usually only spend the Season in London and go to their estates for the rest of the time.
I don't know the answers to everything. But I do know that generations have been getting more stupid and we have lost a great deal of skill.
Master craftsmanship would take a lifetime to learn and they would have been geniuses like Leonardo.
As we increased tech, we chose function over form.... and ended up with neither.
In some ways, I think this may be a psyop against Europeans, like we couldn't have built this.. well, we could have. If not us then who? Africa? Aliens/demons? Previous civilizations? It is entirely possible (and likely) that the French didn't build or invent anything, of course.
However, the architecture in the colonies was influenced/created by Great Britain. For example, they would have expert cartographers (skills now lost) make a map of the new land. They would send the info back to GB via ships. The British would then design entire towns. The design schematics would be sent back to the new world to be built.
William Shakespeare is known for being born and buried in Stratford-upon-Avon. So the British decided to create a theater town and call it Stratford in Canada.
Unfortunately, the design got switched with that of a different city on the way over (they had one job!) And the British on the ground built the wrong design. That is why the other city looks like a theater town instead. You will notice that in pretty much every British colony they have the same names for streets and cities.
Things can change rapidly. There used to be a country called Rhodesia that the British created and was destroyed.
On the other hand, if most info today is fake, probably most of history is too.
Also, if you around, you can see farmer's walls hand built out of stone. That would be a feat impossible for the men of today.
https://archive.ph/qiUyU Modern men have significantly decreased testosterone, strength, grip strength, and fertility from just the last couple generations.
The Victorian people could have been twice as strong, more intelligent, and more driven to create. Look what Germany built in just a few years in the 1930s. From the sick man of Europe to a prosperous economic miracle.
Lmao