I watched a bit but skipped around. The fact that the guy doesn't acknowledge the long exposure seems important. Also, medieval buildings seem to have been even more grand without taking care of paved streets first. It is compelling to see the complexity and craftsmanship but don't know if it's evidence enough. Also different cameras take different times to expose. A small camera with larger aperture will capture people. A full format one today with a small aperture and low iso won't. Except for that horse we see tied to a carriage. I didn't ser the part about 1st floors underground but if the lights are on and they are exposing for the rest of the building, the floor with the lights will ghost out.
Long exposure = no people. No person will stay standing long enough to be captured on film.
What do you mean? Try a 2 minute exposure and see what turns up. Only those things that don't move.
I watched a bit but skipped around. The fact that the guy doesn't acknowledge the long exposure seems important. Also, medieval buildings seem to have been even more grand without taking care of paved streets first. It is compelling to see the complexity and craftsmanship but don't know if it's evidence enough. Also different cameras take different times to expose. A small camera with larger aperture will capture people. A full format one today with a small aperture and low iso won't. Except for that horse we see tied to a carriage. I didn't ser the part about 1st floors underground but if the lights are on and they are exposing for the rest of the building, the floor with the lights will ghost out.
So any counterpoint or just lol no?