This vaccine isn't effective regardless of it killing people.
Vaccination means immunisation not take more vaccines killing people to achieve nothing else. It provided next to no immunisation. Debatable what protection it even offered except repeatedly vaccinate. The risk wasn't worth the reward. Immunity. No.
Except it was a big dumb social study. It simply exploited.
This vaccine meant a detailed social media and data study into who bowed before the summary executioner providing them with a lottery ticket. The luck of the draw where the winner was rewarded speculative efficacy, or side effects. Obviously the winner went onto the next round, winning nothing, except waining efficacy, or more side effects. And if they survived both rounds. There was all the increasing bonus rounds of even less efficacy, and more side effects
This was all in aid of a very detailed social and data study, but had almost nothing to do with any known medicine providing health benefits.
This vaccine simply wasn't effective by every known definition of the word. It is a fraud.
Kinda but a fraud towards the medical meaning of vaccine. The risk death for immunisation wasn't worth the reward if all it provided is efficacy. Where is the greater good? Efficacy isn't greatness, it hasn't succeeded in immunity.
But like the film just watched, god damn it, it was shit. In the shadow of the moon. There hasn't been a vaccine that has completely eradicated any disease. But they have provided far better immunity towards disease vaccinated. Immunity simply isn't efficacy. But on the margin of risk. The numbers, few deaths, for immunity. Obviously a vaccine, causes the greater good. Disease, immunised.
So not like Pol Pot, that's a comparison for any later courts. If it goes on trial. Simply a loophole exploited where the risk hasn't been worth the reward. How many vaccines later did it take to achieve contrary status, failing to provide immunity. Your own body did most of that. Or it also wained. But unlike a murderous vaccine, it became became immune.
Perhaps but debatable. I am trying to stick to the facts. As CNN the topic is so factual. Not. But I mean okay. If I take a measles vaccine I am immunised. I won't catch measles because the vaccine has provided immunity. Not completely it can perhaps be argued. But okay. What it hasn't provided is efficacy. It has provided immunity. So the risk, yes there are risks even with the measles vaccine, but not as many no. Not as many side affects. It is worth the reward the greater good, immunity, the disease is often worse. The same with almost every other vaccination. Up until this bullshit modern woke fraud came along. It hasn't been effective by the definition of vaccination. It is a con. Take more vaccines and you might, god forbid, it still needs further vaccines to provide a simple definition of immunisation. Because it simply isn't effective. Therefore the risk, numerous risks, has not been worth the reward, efficacy.
Don't underestimate her experience. For all you know she might have binge watched the entire CSI series, NCIS, Criminal Minds, and most importantly, House MD.
I love the “I just shit my pants and you can’t do anything about it” face. She seems very learned, even writes about relationships.
It's that Steve Martin face in Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, when he relieves himself at the dinner table.
This vaccine isn't effective regardless of it killing people.
Vaccination means immunisation not take more vaccines killing people to achieve nothing else. It provided next to no immunisation. Debatable what protection it even offered except repeatedly vaccinate. The risk wasn't worth the reward. Immunity. No.
Except it was a big dumb social study. It simply exploited.
You didn't get the memo? Vaccine now means "juice of hope and inheritance," not that old meaning.
This vaccine meant a detailed social media and data study into who bowed before the summary executioner providing them with a lottery ticket. The luck of the draw where the winner was rewarded speculative efficacy, or side effects. Obviously the winner went onto the next round, winning nothing, except waining efficacy, or more side effects. And if they survived both rounds. There was all the increasing bonus rounds of even less efficacy, and more side effects
This was all in aid of a very detailed social and data study, but had almost nothing to do with any known medicine providing health benefits.
This vaccine simply wasn't effective by every known definition of the word. It is a fraud.
Like Pol Pot was a fraud, if you know what i mean.
Kinda but a fraud towards the medical meaning of vaccine. The risk death for immunisation wasn't worth the reward if all it provided is efficacy. Where is the greater good? Efficacy isn't greatness, it hasn't succeeded in immunity.
But like the film just watched, god damn it, it was shit. In the shadow of the moon. There hasn't been a vaccine that has completely eradicated any disease. But they have provided far better immunity towards disease vaccinated. Immunity simply isn't efficacy. But on the margin of risk. The numbers, few deaths, for immunity. Obviously a vaccine, causes the greater good. Disease, immunised.
So not like Pol Pot, that's a comparison for any later courts. If it goes on trial. Simply a loophole exploited where the risk hasn't been worth the reward. How many vaccines later did it take to achieve contrary status, failing to provide immunity. Your own body did most of that. Or it also wained. But unlike a murderous vaccine, it became became immune.
Yeah i agree, that was more referring to the death toll
If you take care or yourself, vaccines are not necessary.
Perhaps but debatable. I am trying to stick to the facts. As CNN the topic is so factual. Not. But I mean okay. If I take a measles vaccine I am immunised. I won't catch measles because the vaccine has provided immunity. Not completely it can perhaps be argued. But okay. What it hasn't provided is efficacy. It has provided immunity. So the risk, yes there are risks even with the measles vaccine, but not as many no. Not as many side affects. It is worth the reward the greater good, immunity, the disease is often worse. The same with almost every other vaccination. Up until this bullshit modern woke fraud came along. It hasn't been effective by the definition of vaccination. It is a con. Take more vaccines and you might, god forbid, it still needs further vaccines to provide a simple definition of immunisation. Because it simply isn't effective. Therefore the risk, numerous risks, has not been worth the reward, efficacy.
“HETTER” hmmm… sounds… like… a
Its either that or the vaccines are perfectly effective, just not against viruses, but instead people.
Pretty effective at destroying people and their immune system.
Don't underestimate her experience. For all you know she might have binge watched the entire CSI series, NCIS, Criminal Minds, and most importantly, House MD.
The point is that she can't admit she was wrong and endangered/shortened the lives of everyone around her. She never will.
Human Piece of Garbage.