Motion represents loss; resistance within motion represents growth. Motion inspires resistance by differentiating the whole into the partial within the only whole. The suggestion of winning tempts one to ignore resisting; while suggested losing tempts one to hold onto "prices already won", hence also ignoring to resist being moved.
per "around"
a) PER - "a Latin preposition, denoting through, passing, over the whole extent; by"
b) "around" implies around others; hence among partial; which implies within; by and in response to whole.
armed force
"furnished with weapons of offense or defense" (armed) implies the weapon of choice; while force implies velocity; momentum and resistance aka resistance as the defense within the momentum of offending velocity aka living (defense) within the process of dying (offense).
So we're looking for a man about town and a fella with two arms.
One is being tempted to look forwards; while ignoring the response-ability (choice) to origin (balance). The two armed man about town represents choice falling for the temptation of form (want) over flow (need).
As for "we" and "two arms"...one perceives one arm and another one arm in different positions within the oneness of all, and why would the partial within the whole need to suggest in the name of others (we)? Before both of these issues came the choice to count and brand "units" so that one can suggest both to other ones.
How about from this perspective...to be (one) comes before suggesting what (we)
Was it I that was measuring...
"we" and "two arms" suggests as such.
or did I blurt out strings like a malfunctioning database engine and it was left as an exercise for the reader to go about assigning some sense of what might be called positionality to them?
Whatever you choose has consequences for others; and whatever others choose represents the need to adapt to what's being sensed and the temptation to assign sense to suggestible meaning.
cromulent
A Simpsons reference aka SONs of SIMPle (single; consisting of one thing; uncompounded)...for all represents one in energy.
STICKS!? What is this utter extravagance! We ain't got no sticks
Oh dear; another one burdened by faggots...
I'm gonna make bumper-stickers of this (If one consents to the judge; one ignores being the court)
Displaying messages of empowerment while driving around neutered in electric cars...
The commotion of the motion brings the notion that we're all absolutely stuck, as if by some manner of glue, on a road to, well, somewhere.
What if the process of dying is impressing (loss) to inspire those living within to express (growth); which requires choice of adaptation (need); hence also offering the temptation of ignorance (want) aka self repression?
In other words...those who ignore to grow are tempted to feel stuck; while being moved on a road they ignore (process of dying) towards somewhere (death) their ignorance denies them to comprehend. Furthermore; the choice to ignore need for want; tempts them to want to hold onto; hence gluing themselves onto temporary within ongoing.
The few utilize suggestion to tempt the many to willingly attach themselves to the fleeting material; while ignoring to be the material resistance (living) within the immaterial velocity (process of dying).
commotion of the motion brings the notion
The ignorance of temperance towards permanence tempts impotence of sustenance through lack of resistance.
Which is all fine and good, right up until those differentiated bits start cottoning on and before one can so much as a swing a cat they're all over the show, each one pointing to another one and declaring "That's me, over there!" at which point it rapidly becomes very confusing for everyone.
Which is why the ongoing whole differentiates into "temporary" partials; which have to struggle to sustain self (apartheid); while resisting the temptation of "cottoning" together. Entrance the parasitic few suggesting the ignorant many to pick cotton together.
As for losing and winning - these are different words for what is far too often the same thing
If one (living) comprehends the only origin (process of dying); then it isn't about wanting (winning) vs not wanting (losing); but about the need to grow within loss; by resisting the temptation of suggested wins or loses.
to sell
Choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) contract law allows the few to sell everything perceivable back to the many who ignore this for suggested.
Everyone (perceiving) exists at the center of everything (perceivable) as the free will of choice to utilize it (growth)...or ignore it (loss). The few sell perceivable loss under suggested growth back to the many who pay growth (living) into loss (dying). A self destruction racket; more or less carefully hidden behind suggested narratives; which are collapsing upon each other over and over again.
In short...suggesting to sell what is perceptibly free.
if choice itself were a weapon...
WEAPON, noun - "any instrument of offense"...there has to be a weapon of offense (choice) within a self sustaining system of defense (balance). The "will" within free will of choice represents the want (temptation) within the need (resistance).
Self discernment has to be grown for one to comprehend that "instrument" implies in response to perceivable sound. Without that one views any weapon as offense vs defense among others; instead of as response-ability (choice) to origin (balance).
I have no basis for suggesting
Choice represents the base for suggestion (want); perceivable balance (need) represents the base for choice. Those who are reasoning against each other about suggestion; lack comprehension about base (choice) because they already consented by choice to the suggested choices of others; hence willingly ignoring free will of choice; while submitting the choices of others.
never yet led me astray
Inception towards death represents the way; momentum (balance) represents what one perceives it at, and ones choice operates at the center thereof. One cannot wander off the path (astray) while being confined to the momentum of the only path. Wandering around in willing ignorance is a choice tho...
face forward, no doubt to better track prey
Why hunting prey? To sustain self. Where to sustain self? Within momentum (balance); hence origin of every choice to hunt. Now change perspective to the prey...sustaining self; while resisting the suggested temptations by others (getting hunted down) all while adapting as choice to the ever changing moment (balance).
Even while both hunter and hunted are "facing" death; they each operate for the sustenance of life; hence adapting to origin...not to the predefined outcome. Once again; such a perspective requires the growth of self discernment about living within the process of dying; hence in need to react to an enacting system; while being tempted to want everything else.
gazes are harmonized somewhere forward
From center (perceiving) into surrounding (perceivable) based on free will of choice.
looking in other directions
a) inception towards death represents the only direction...looking freely (choice) around within the momentum (balance) thereof; doesn't change the direction.
b) constant change (aka forward velocity) represents direction (progress of dying) for those (living) within.
c) if all represents one in energy; then others represent moving partials of the whole. All others represent perceivable inspiration (need) and suggesting information (want) for ones free will of choice. If all represents one in energy; then there can be only one; hence all for one and one for all.
What's lacking is each ones self discernment about representing a partial within a self differentiating whole. The more one comprehends apartheid; the more one comprehends wholeness. The parasitic few distract the ignorant many from that by suggesting diversity (difference) for equality (sameness) as the inversion of difference (partial) out of sameness (whole).
regarded by the aforementioned others as some manner of potentate
Every one represents potential (growth) within potentiality (loss); yet it requires adaptation of potential to potentiality to grow; while resisting the temptation to drain potential among others.
In other words...one is tempted to want what others grow; while ignoring the need to grow oneself.
Also...one doesn't need to regard the suggestions of others; one represents the RE (responding) GUARD (preservation; self sustenance) within perceivable.
to have a posse assembled
Strength in numbers (sleight of hand for strength within the designated unit "one") misdirected by suggested collectivism (out of many; one) against others. Notice also...POSSE (possession) aka want over need.
Wherefrom hangs this platform? Why, from skyhooks, naturally?
PLAT (to spread) FORM (that manner of being peculiar to each body, which exhibits it to the eye as distinct from every other body) aka growth through self differentiation within loss.
Also; PLATEAU (elevated tract of relatively level land) aka choice based growth (elevation) within the momentum (level aka balance) of motion, hence the implied relation of growth to loss; of form to flow; of elevation to degradation etc.
The hook on the other hand represents the snare; the temptation to want to hold onto the material (life); while ignoring to grow in response to immaterial (inception towards death).
Does the rain choose upon whom it falls?
Each drop of liquid seeks level (balance); hence representing choice. Liquid also adapts to ever changing circumstances. You don't perceive rain (plural) but partial liquid within whole motion. Branding the momentum of liquid "rain" was suggested to you. Furthermore; suggested "whom" implies the choice to count; while each part of liquid adapts to the whole momentum until disrupted by "whomever" chose to resist liquid finding level.
automotion
The few suggest "automobile" to tempt the many to ignore being mobility (living) within automation (process of dying). They furthermore tempt choice into a conflict between manual and automatic; as the inversion of being the manual choice within the automatic balance.
Motion represents loss; resistance within motion represents growth. Motion inspires resistance by differentiating the whole into the partial within the only whole. The suggestion of winning tempts one to ignore resisting; while suggested losing tempts one to hold onto "prices already won", hence also ignoring to resist being moved.
a) PER - "a Latin preposition, denoting through, passing, over the whole extent; by"
b) "around" implies around others; hence among partial; which implies within; by and in response to whole.
"furnished with weapons of offense or defense" (armed) implies the weapon of choice; while force implies velocity; momentum and resistance aka resistance as the defense within the momentum of offending velocity aka living (defense) within the process of dying (offense).
One is being tempted to look forwards; while ignoring the response-ability (choice) to origin (balance). The two armed man about town represents choice falling for the temptation of form (want) over flow (need).
As for "we" and "two arms"...one perceives one arm and another one arm in different positions within the oneness of all, and why would the partial within the whole need to suggest in the name of others (we)? Before both of these issues came the choice to count and brand "units" so that one can suggest both to other ones.
How about from this perspective...to be (one) comes before suggesting what (we)
"we" and "two arms" suggests as such.
Whatever you choose has consequences for others; and whatever others choose represents the need to adapt to what's being sensed and the temptation to assign sense to suggestible meaning.
A Simpsons reference aka SONs of SIMPle (single; consisting of one thing; uncompounded)...for all represents one in energy.
Oh dear; another one burdened by faggots...
Displaying messages of empowerment while driving around neutered in electric cars...
What if the process of dying is impressing (loss) to inspire those living within to express (growth); which requires choice of adaptation (need); hence also offering the temptation of ignorance (want) aka self repression?
In other words...those who ignore to grow are tempted to feel stuck; while being moved on a road they ignore (process of dying) towards somewhere (death) their ignorance denies them to comprehend. Furthermore; the choice to ignore need for want; tempts them to want to hold onto; hence gluing themselves onto temporary within ongoing.
The few utilize suggestion to tempt the many to willingly attach themselves to the fleeting material; while ignoring to be the material resistance (living) within the immaterial velocity (process of dying).
The ignorance of temperance towards permanence tempts impotence of sustenance through lack of resistance.
Which is why the ongoing whole differentiates into "temporary" partials; which have to struggle to sustain self (apartheid); while resisting the temptation of "cottoning" together. Entrance the parasitic few suggesting the ignorant many to pick cotton together.
If one (living) comprehends the only origin (process of dying); then it isn't about wanting (winning) vs not wanting (losing); but about the need to grow within loss; by resisting the temptation of suggested wins or loses.
Choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) contract law allows the few to sell everything perceivable back to the many who ignore this for suggested.
Everyone (perceiving) exists at the center of everything (perceivable) as the free will of choice to utilize it (growth)...or ignore it (loss). The few sell perceivable loss under suggested growth back to the many who pay growth (living) into loss (dying). A self destruction racket; more or less carefully hidden behind suggested narratives; which are collapsing upon each other over and over again.
In short...suggesting to sell what is perceptibly free.
WEAPON, noun - "any instrument of offense"...there has to be a weapon of offense (choice) within a self sustaining system of defense (balance). The "will" within free will of choice represents the want (temptation) within the need (resistance).
Self discernment has to be grown for one to comprehend that "instrument" implies in response to perceivable sound. Without that one views any weapon as offense vs defense among others; instead of as response-ability (choice) to origin (balance).
Choice represents the base for suggestion (want); perceivable balance (need) represents the base for choice. Those who are reasoning against each other about suggestion; lack comprehension about base (choice) because they already consented by choice to the suggested choices of others; hence willingly ignoring free will of choice; while submitting the choices of others.
Inception towards death represents the way; momentum (balance) represents what one perceives it at, and ones choice operates at the center thereof. One cannot wander off the path (astray) while being confined to the momentum of the only path. Wandering around in willing ignorance is a choice tho...
Why hunting prey? To sustain self. Where to sustain self? Within momentum (balance); hence origin of every choice to hunt. Now change perspective to the prey...sustaining self; while resisting the suggested temptations by others (getting hunted down) all while adapting as choice to the ever changing moment (balance).
Even while both hunter and hunted are "facing" death; they each operate for the sustenance of life; hence adapting to origin...not to the predefined outcome. Once again; such a perspective requires the growth of self discernment about living within the process of dying; hence in need to react to an enacting system; while being tempted to want everything else.
From center (perceiving) into surrounding (perceivable) based on free will of choice.
a) inception towards death represents the only direction...looking freely (choice) around within the momentum (balance) thereof; doesn't change the direction.
b) constant change (aka forward velocity) represents direction (progress of dying) for those (living) within.
c) if all represents one in energy; then others represent moving partials of the whole. All others represent perceivable inspiration (need) and suggesting information (want) for ones free will of choice. If all represents one in energy; then there can be only one; hence all for one and one for all.
What's lacking is each ones self discernment about representing a partial within a self differentiating whole. The more one comprehends apartheid; the more one comprehends wholeness. The parasitic few distract the ignorant many from that by suggesting diversity (difference) for equality (sameness) as the inversion of difference (partial) out of sameness (whole).
Every one represents potential (growth) within potentiality (loss); yet it requires adaptation of potential to potentiality to grow; while resisting the temptation to drain potential among others.
In other words...one is tempted to want what others grow; while ignoring the need to grow oneself.
Also...one doesn't need to regard the suggestions of others; one represents the RE (responding) GUARD (preservation; self sustenance) within perceivable.
Strength in numbers (sleight of hand for strength within the designated unit "one") misdirected by suggested collectivism (out of many; one) against others. Notice also...POSSE (possession) aka want over need.
PLAT (to spread) FORM (that manner of being peculiar to each body, which exhibits it to the eye as distinct from every other body) aka growth through self differentiation within loss.
Also; PLATEAU (elevated tract of relatively level land) aka choice based growth (elevation) within the momentum (level aka balance) of motion, hence the implied relation of growth to loss; of form to flow; of elevation to degradation etc.
The hook on the other hand represents the snare; the temptation to want to hold onto the material (life); while ignoring to grow in response to immaterial (inception towards death).
Each drop of liquid seeks level (balance); hence representing choice. Liquid also adapts to ever changing circumstances. You don't perceive rain (plural) but partial liquid within whole motion. Branding the momentum of liquid "rain" was suggested to you. Furthermore; suggested "whom" implies the choice to count; while each part of liquid adapts to the whole momentum until disrupted by "whomever" chose to resist liquid finding level.
The few suggest "automobile" to tempt the many to ignore being mobility (living) within automation (process of dying). They furthermore tempt choice into a conflict between manual and automatic; as the inversion of being the manual choice within the automatic balance.