Does that represent spending resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying)? What if resistance has to be grown as to be able to spend it? What if spending it represents the temptation to ignore growing it?
bang on a drum
Does an instrument exist within sound? IN (within) STRUO (to prepare) MENT (mind; memory)...what if growing resistance represents preparation? What if resisting sound represents resonance; while ignoring to resist represents dissonance?
EVERYTHING IN LIFE IS A...
If one exists in it; can one define what it "is" or is one tempted to suggest others what "is"; while tempting them to ignore what "was" perceivable before?
TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary.] + FLEX'IBLE, adjective [Latin flexibilis, from flecto, flexi, to bend] - "capable of being turned or forced from a straight line or form without breaking; pliant; yielding to pressure"
Perceivable balance represents the boundary (term) for the perceiving choice (flexible) within. Holding onto represents the temptation to ignore resisting being moved by. How could choice hold onto balance if balance (momentum) is within motion?
"flexitive" action
Flexible choice implies reaction to inflexible balance. Momentum has to stay the same (balanced) for the different form within to have the choice to exist.
Phalanges
Joint digits represent a partial of a whole. No matter how outermost (extreme) one points the digits; one still exists as choice within the innermost part of balance.
hold fast
This is great...fast implicating the temporary choice to hold onto while moving; hence being resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying). Holding onto wants represents the temptation; adaptation to need represents the response-ability (choice) to sustain self.
The plurality of idioms
It's ones consent to another ones suggested idiom which tempts the singular one to claim ownership of plural suggestions. Why? Because if one consents to the suggestions of others; then one ignores the single source of all perceivable. This in return makes the one suggesting the singular source of everything suggestible.
Those who ignore reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggestion) can be sold reality as peace-meal fiction; hence the use of suggested information (words) upon the flow of perceivable inspiration (sound). Each part of a moving system expresses the whole of it; which one ignores when consenting to endless words describing different aspects of the same source.
habit of, upon encountering an unfamiliar thing, to attempt at once to take it
Tempted by want to ignore response-ability (choice) within need. One cannot claim what reality already offered towards free will of choice; only adapt to perceivable to grow comprehension of it. Choosing to ignore this; while falling for temptation; represses that growth of comprehension; hence being further tempted to suggested explanations about the perceivable, yet as of now incomprehensible.
Another issue here is the lack of self discernment about being different (partial) within same (whole); hence being tempted to familiarize everything aka domestication of choice within perceivable differences.
The parasitic few exploit this through the suggestion of e pluribus unum (out of many; one), hence tempting the many "unite" together; while ignoring UNITY; UNUS (one) aka being apart (partial within whole).
if that fails... paint it
Suggestion as means of distraction from perceivable. Humanity in a nutshell.
one drum...rhythm by drummer
Aka the whole (drum) and the partial (drummer) expressing the whole. It's on the partial to grow potential for expression within the potentiality of the whole. The few suggest instruments (Rockefeller literally supplied the education system with instruments just to gain control over the tuning frequency) to tempt each one of the many to ignore being the INSTRUO (to prepare) MENT (mind; memory) within the source of sound.
the drummer is a legal fiction
Branding the temporary drummer by suggestion represents the legal fiction; for which one ignores legal reality of sound causing resonance and dissonance within itself. For one to drum implies the choice between resonance (need) and dissonance (want); while the designation "drummer" implies a suggestion by or towards others.
holding is a hand action and balance is something that comes from the gut
Hand implies the choice to grip; gut implies dealing with the consequences of former intake choices. Furthermore; GUT, noun - "intestinal canal of an animal; a pipe or tube extending, with many circumvolutions"...aka a formed "torus of the spiral line of the Ionic order" to deal with the consequences of animation.
As resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying) such circumvolutions prolong resistance by filtering incoming velocity or in the gut case; the animated form passing through.
The balance aspect in this seems to represent the opportunity to perceive the momentum of form within flow; hence experiencing the whole process within the partial (yourself); which should inspire (hunger) one to maintain balance (momentum); yet tempts one (taste) to shove all kinds of crap down the hatch.
I always make my balance
Balancing implies as choice in response to balance, not making it. To balance something else (jelly) still implies as choice within balance (need/want). I leave the need or want of balancing jelly to your experience, cause I need more feedback from my food. Jelly is too easy...I suspect foul-play in that.
to the scale of a boat-oar
That implies a lot jelly to serve...or lots of effort to transport few amounts of it.
to disseminate teachings on the meaning of life to the masses - no doubt having mistaken me for one of those wiseguys
A wise man once asked thee "is it to be or not to be?"...And I replied, "Oh, why ask me?" Like why ask me what you are instead of being what you are until you comprehend what it means?
I sliced that meaning of life
That represents the choice to shape predefined meaning perceived; instead of reasoning over suggested meaning. No wonder that was easier to digest.
"to show, solemnly pronounce"
What shows? The oneness of all perceivable. What can solemnly pronounce? The ones perceiving all perceivable. Hence were back at the the designation of the unit (one).
On idioms...from hwédios, from swéd-yo-s, from swé ("self")
The only self that can be sustained of form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents the perpetuated one (blood within bloodline); hence ones (form) perpetuation representing an expression of oneness (flow). It's the use of idioms to define flow-state meaning (inspiration) with affixed words (information) that contradicts everything.
If one uses words; one expresses through the suggested tools of others into the perceivable world aka muted communication through noisy miscommunication. Which brings us to those idiots who just can't shut up to listen for a moment.
On a side-note..."a person who has understanding enough to measure a yard of cloth, number twenty correctly, tell the days of the week, etc., is not an idiot in the eye of the law" ~Webster's 1828
private citizen
Private implies separate (the status quo for being partial within whole); while citizen implies at liberty of others; hence incorporated within a city; governed by others. A deliberate contradiction in terms. The kosher legal term would be "private resident" from RES'IDENT, adjective [Latin residens.] - "dwelling or having an abode in a place for a continuance of time, but not definite"; which adheres to natural law; hence being temporarily (resident) different (private).
layman
More trickery here...suggested layman implies distinction from perceivable CLERGY, noun - "the body of men set apart" (hence being partial within whole) and Blacks Law Dictionary defines layman as "a person with no particular profession" aka PROFES'SION, noun [Latin professio.] - "open declaration"; which implies expressing oneself through free will of choice within the perceivable natural order instead of ignoring it.
In short...layman represents the ones being branded and exploited for their ignorance of representing clergy (partial within whole).
Maaaan, try tellin' that to the crowds always trying to scale the mountain.
That's the issue with ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested)...they are tempted to want more than everything already offered, and so they claim what is; instead of growing themselves within it.
Which self?
The one...one cannot hold onto; hence the perpetuated self through intercourse with others aka the self which "springs off" one. That's the only self one can sustain within a self sustaining system.
That one over there? Or this one here?
That represents you measuring by choice within the same position of balance...the ever changing moment (um). Here and there implies everywhere; cause all represents one in energy.
out the corner of my eye, all of 'em look like they're phalanges of the same
Because the "all seeing I" perceives moving division within a whole, and the chosen angle of perspective puts them together via comprehension. And as if that wasn't enough of a struggle; there's also the parasitic few suggesting e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka lumping as many divisions together to prevent the many from adapting to them as inspiration for the sustenance of apartheid (yet another term inverted).
never not play the whole instrument
Like the sticks of a drummer go venturing off center to anything adding a different flavor.
Everything in life is a... metaphor?
All represents one in energy; each one within represents a different perspective; transferring over (metaphor) partial responses within the whole.
The suggested metaphor (similitude reduced to a single word) tempts one to ignore perceivable metaphor (being the reduced partial within the self differentiating whole).
the brands themselves are fictions of a sort
Spell-craft aka suggested words over perceivable sound. The few trick the many to brand a moving system; as to gain control over the suggested brands. The spelling of the consenting many is being crafted by the suggesting few.
Suggestion represents the idolatry of perceivable.
natural court
Reaction (choice) represents the court; enclosed within the enacting (balance) yard...both produced by the motion of nature. The parasitic few suggest judges (their judgement) into the court (choice) of the consenting many. If one consents to the judge; one ignores being the court. Stepping into a court demands wielding free will of choice within balance; while resisting all the suggested imbalances by others.
The suggested "court order" tempts the court (choice) within the natural order (balance) to ignore being temporary disorder (living) within the ongoing natural order (process of dying). So whenever the judge suggests "stop; hammertime"; the court (choice) has to respond with "you can't touch this" momentum (balance). The judge doesn't make order; the court represents the resistance within the natural order..."And I'm known as such...And this is a beat uh you can't touch" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l4Wo
The United States Incorporated - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-DNWqWBbkA
Greek, you mean Phoenician? https://www.forumancientcoins.com/catalog/roman-and-greek-coins.asp?vpar=598&pos=0&sold=1
Capital is full of fascist and Catholic symbols.
Choice is located at the center of balance.
Balance represents the momentum of constant change.
Those who ignore perceivable change for suggested brands (names; idols; affixed meaning) can be rebranded at will by those making the suggestions.
Nature represents a moving system...it doesn't suggest names for anything; it moves everything.
Late Edit: Rinse (process of dying); Repeat (living)...
Does that represent spending resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying)? What if resistance has to be grown as to be able to spend it? What if spending it represents the temptation to ignore growing it?
Does an instrument exist within sound? IN (within) STRUO (to prepare) MENT (mind; memory)...what if growing resistance represents preparation? What if resisting sound represents resonance; while ignoring to resist represents dissonance?
If one exists in it; can one define what it "is" or is one tempted to suggest others what "is"; while tempting them to ignore what "was" perceivable before?
Perceivable balance represents the boundary (term) for the perceiving choice (flexible) within. Holding onto represents the temptation to ignore resisting being moved by. How could choice hold onto balance if balance (momentum) is within motion?
Flexible choice implies reaction to inflexible balance. Momentum has to stay the same (balanced) for the different form within to have the choice to exist.
Joint digits represent a partial of a whole. No matter how outermost (extreme) one points the digits; one still exists as choice within the innermost part of balance.
This is great...fast implicating the temporary choice to hold onto while moving; hence being resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying). Holding onto wants represents the temptation; adaptation to need represents the response-ability (choice) to sustain self.
It's ones consent to another ones suggested idiom which tempts the singular one to claim ownership of plural suggestions. Why? Because if one consents to the suggestions of others; then one ignores the single source of all perceivable. This in return makes the one suggesting the singular source of everything suggestible.
Those who ignore reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggestion) can be sold reality as peace-meal fiction; hence the use of suggested information (words) upon the flow of perceivable inspiration (sound). Each part of a moving system expresses the whole of it; which one ignores when consenting to endless words describing different aspects of the same source.
Tempted by want to ignore response-ability (choice) within need. One cannot claim what reality already offered towards free will of choice; only adapt to perceivable to grow comprehension of it. Choosing to ignore this; while falling for temptation; represses that growth of comprehension; hence being further tempted to suggested explanations about the perceivable, yet as of now incomprehensible.
Another issue here is the lack of self discernment about being different (partial) within same (whole); hence being tempted to familiarize everything aka domestication of choice within perceivable differences.
The parasitic few exploit this through the suggestion of e pluribus unum (out of many; one), hence tempting the many "unite" together; while ignoring UNITY; UNUS (one) aka being apart (partial within whole).
Suggestion as means of distraction from perceivable. Humanity in a nutshell.
Aka the whole (drum) and the partial (drummer) expressing the whole. It's on the partial to grow potential for expression within the potentiality of the whole. The few suggest instruments (Rockefeller literally supplied the education system with instruments just to gain control over the tuning frequency) to tempt each one of the many to ignore being the INSTRUO (to prepare) MENT (mind; memory) within the source of sound.
Branding the temporary drummer by suggestion represents the legal fiction; for which one ignores legal reality of sound causing resonance and dissonance within itself. For one to drum implies the choice between resonance (need) and dissonance (want); while the designation "drummer" implies a suggestion by or towards others.
All the neighbors in unison: "YES; DO THAT!"
Hand implies the choice to grip; gut implies dealing with the consequences of former intake choices. Furthermore; GUT, noun - "intestinal canal of an animal; a pipe or tube extending, with many circumvolutions"...aka a formed "torus of the spiral line of the Ionic order" to deal with the consequences of animation.
As resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying) such circumvolutions prolong resistance by filtering incoming velocity or in the gut case; the animated form passing through.
The balance aspect in this seems to represent the opportunity to perceive the momentum of form within flow; hence experiencing the whole process within the partial (yourself); which should inspire (hunger) one to maintain balance (momentum); yet tempts one (taste) to shove all kinds of crap down the hatch.
Balancing implies as choice in response to balance, not making it. To balance something else (jelly) still implies as choice within balance (need/want). I leave the need or want of balancing jelly to your experience, cause I need more feedback from my food. Jelly is too easy...I suspect foul-play in that.
That implies a lot jelly to serve...or lots of effort to transport few amounts of it.
A wise man once asked thee "is it to be or not to be?"...And I replied, "Oh, why ask me?" Like why ask me what you are instead of being what you are until you comprehend what it means?
That represents the choice to shape predefined meaning perceived; instead of reasoning over suggested meaning. No wonder that was easier to digest.
What shows? The oneness of all perceivable. What can solemnly pronounce? The ones perceiving all perceivable. Hence were back at the the designation of the unit (one).
The only self that can be sustained of form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents the perpetuated one (blood within bloodline); hence ones (form) perpetuation representing an expression of oneness (flow). It's the use of idioms to define flow-state meaning (inspiration) with affixed words (information) that contradicts everything.
If one uses words; one expresses through the suggested tools of others into the perceivable world aka muted communication through noisy miscommunication. Which brings us to those idiots who just can't shut up to listen for a moment.
On a side-note..."a person who has understanding enough to measure a yard of cloth, number twenty correctly, tell the days of the week, etc., is not an idiot in the eye of the law" ~Webster's 1828
Private implies separate (the status quo for being partial within whole); while citizen implies at liberty of others; hence incorporated within a city; governed by others. A deliberate contradiction in terms. The kosher legal term would be "private resident" from RES'IDENT, adjective [Latin residens.] - "dwelling or having an abode in a place for a continuance of time, but not definite"; which adheres to natural law; hence being temporarily (resident) different (private).
More trickery here...suggested layman implies distinction from perceivable CLERGY, noun - "the body of men set apart" (hence being partial within whole) and Blacks Law Dictionary defines layman as "a person with no particular profession" aka PROFES'SION, noun [Latin professio.] - "open declaration"; which implies expressing oneself through free will of choice within the perceivable natural order instead of ignoring it.
In short...layman represents the ones being branded and exploited for their ignorance of representing clergy (partial within whole).
That's the issue with ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested)...they are tempted to want more than everything already offered, and so they claim what is; instead of growing themselves within it.
The one...one cannot hold onto; hence the perpetuated self through intercourse with others aka the self which "springs off" one. That's the only self one can sustain within a self sustaining system.
That represents you measuring by choice within the same position of balance...the ever changing moment (um). Here and there implies everywhere; cause all represents one in energy.
Sleight of hand from the tavistock boys...The Beatles - "Here; There And Everywhere" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdcSFVXd3MU
Because the "all seeing I" perceives moving division within a whole, and the chosen angle of perspective puts them together via comprehension. And as if that wasn't enough of a struggle; there's also the parasitic few suggesting e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka lumping as many divisions together to prevent the many from adapting to them as inspiration for the sustenance of apartheid (yet another term inverted).
Like the sticks of a drummer go venturing off center to anything adding a different flavor.
All represents one in energy; each one within represents a different perspective; transferring over (metaphor) partial responses within the whole.
The suggested metaphor (similitude reduced to a single word) tempts one to ignore perceivable metaphor (being the reduced partial within the self differentiating whole).
Spell-craft aka suggested words over perceivable sound. The few trick the many to brand a moving system; as to gain control over the suggested brands. The spelling of the consenting many is being crafted by the suggesting few.
Suggestion represents the idolatry of perceivable.
Reaction (choice) represents the court; enclosed within the enacting (balance) yard...both produced by the motion of nature. The parasitic few suggest judges (their judgement) into the court (choice) of the consenting many. If one consents to the judge; one ignores being the court. Stepping into a court demands wielding free will of choice within balance; while resisting all the suggested imbalances by others.
The suggested "court order" tempts the court (choice) within the natural order (balance) to ignore being temporary disorder (living) within the ongoing natural order (process of dying). So whenever the judge suggests "stop; hammertime"; the court (choice) has to respond with "you can't touch this" momentum (balance). The judge doesn't make order; the court represents the resistance within the natural order..."And I'm known as such...And this is a beat uh you can't touch" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l4Wo