There is energy loss in every energy system. You just have to engineer around them.
If they want everything to go electric, they should have started installing MSRs at the block level 50 years ago. Then we could have electric cars today.
But, no, nuclear was the boogeyman 50 years ago. Now it's "carbon ".
I always assumed the H2 gas would be made at the filling station. They'd have a water line, filter/distillation, and then a big electrical supply to split the water to fill the onsite storage tank.
• once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source, electricity can always be generated to power the engines.
• from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors, from my perspective.
the conspiracy:
• so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?
• my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this "shift to electric" as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.
• but i DO like solar (not ideally) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" (whatever the fuck that means) -- more fundamentally, it's about the stability of civilization.
Until we have a solid solar/wind/hydroelectric infrastructure set up, a lot of the electric vehicles will be charging from stations using some form of peteoleum/coal.
AUTO (by itself) MOBILE (movable)...a sleight of hand for being movable (living) within automation (process of dying). Consenting to suggested automobiles allows those suggesting to make those consenting immobile.
electric production is not sustainable
What if form (life) represents the temporary magnetic product within flow (inception towards death) aka ongoing electric production, and what if the coexistence of magnetic (resistance) within electric (velocity) aka growth within loss represents self sustenance of energy (internal power)?
A self sustaining system (enacting) requiring each one within to struggle to sustain self (reaction) by resisting (living) temptation (dying)...what if the few simply exploit the ignorance of the many towards living (resistance) by suggesting them dying (temptation)?
Ever since I saw that Japanese dude's paper on water, I believe this is the missing key. Water changes shape with vibrations. We are mostly water. Star chambers were vibrational healing. We should all be riding magic water carpets. Lol BTW, that shut up woman and mount my horse was fn hilarious.
Water changes shape with vibrations. We are mostly water.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) all fluids also represent form within flow; yet are being suggested as "fluids" to tempt one to ignore the perceivable behavior of form (reaction) within flow (enacting)...adaptation to momentum; hence finding level within the momentum of motion (balance).
One cannot perceive motion; only respond (as choice) to being moved within the momentum (balance) of motion. Choice is contained at the center of balance (momentum of motion) aka the ever changing moment one perceives.
Flow represents velocity (forward motion); which causes momentum; which establishes form aka the choice to resist (living) velocity (process of dying). Now if velocity meets resistance; this causes friction and vibration; which is what establishes temporary form (growth) within ongoing flow (loss).
This is what allows form with choice to shape itself within the mold of balance aka the momentum of flow.
Sleight of hand...being MORPHEUS (Greek morphē "form, shape, figure") - "the maker of shapes" within MATRIX (Old French matrice) - "womb; source". The suggested NEO (new) is what tempts one to ignore perceivable "now".
It ain't neo fighting agents; it's AGENT (enacting) generating reacting resistance through self differentiation aka transmutation of flow into form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka ingredient out of base alchemy aka partial (perceiving) out of whole (perceivable) transmutation.
Instead of suggesting "we are" ask yourself if "one is" because "oneness was" aka one is able to perceive because all perceivable was beforehand. Is there or can there be anything perceivable that doesn't represent energy (internal power)?
vibration healing
Choice adapting to balance aka partial adapting to whole, hence HEAL, verb [Latin celo; Heb. to be whole or entire, all.] which grows resistance of form within flow.
Ignoring to resist as form allows flow to transmute form back to base. The few suggest the many to follow orders instead of resisting the natural order; hence tempting them back to base; which in return allows the few to exploit the lack of resistance among the many.
There is energy loss in every energy system. You just have to engineer around them.
If they want everything to go electric, they should have started installing MSRs at the block level 50 years ago. Then we could have electric cars today.
But, no, nuclear was the boogeyman 50 years ago. Now it's "carbon ".
I always assumed the H2 gas would be made at the filling station. They'd have a water line, filter/distillation, and then a big electrical supply to split the water to fill the onsite storage tank.
Wow! I had no idea.
i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:
oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;
coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;
solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;
tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;
geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;
nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;
even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;
etc. etc. etc.
• once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source, electricity can always be generated to power the engines.
• from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors, from my perspective.
the conspiracy:
• so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?
• my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this "shift to electric" as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.
• but i DO like solar (not ideally) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" (whatever the fuck that means) -- more fundamentally, it's about the stability of civilization.
EV is about control. Control via smart meter on your house, through fsd software etc.
Until we have a solid solar/wind/hydroelectric infrastructure set up, a lot of the electric vehicles will be charging from stations using some form of peteoleum/coal.
That doesn't mean we shouldn't change though.
AUTO (by itself) MOBILE (movable)...a sleight of hand for being movable (living) within automation (process of dying). Consenting to suggested automobiles allows those suggesting to make those consenting immobile.
What if form (life) represents the temporary magnetic product within flow (inception towards death) aka ongoing electric production, and what if the coexistence of magnetic (resistance) within electric (velocity) aka growth within loss represents self sustenance of energy (internal power)?
A self sustaining system (enacting) requiring each one within to struggle to sustain self (reaction) by resisting (living) temptation (dying)...what if the few simply exploit the ignorance of the many towards living (resistance) by suggesting them dying (temptation)?
Ever since I saw that Japanese dude's paper on water, I believe this is the missing key. Water changes shape with vibrations. We are mostly water. Star chambers were vibrational healing. We should all be riding magic water carpets. Lol BTW, that shut up woman and mount my horse was fn hilarious.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) all fluids also represent form within flow; yet are being suggested as "fluids" to tempt one to ignore the perceivable behavior of form (reaction) within flow (enacting)...adaptation to momentum; hence finding level within the momentum of motion (balance).
One cannot perceive motion; only respond (as choice) to being moved within the momentum (balance) of motion. Choice is contained at the center of balance (momentum of motion) aka the ever changing moment one perceives.
Flow represents velocity (forward motion); which causes momentum; which establishes form aka the choice to resist (living) velocity (process of dying). Now if velocity meets resistance; this causes friction and vibration; which is what establishes temporary form (growth) within ongoing flow (loss).
This is what allows form with choice to shape itself within the mold of balance aka the momentum of flow.
Sleight of hand...being MORPHEUS (Greek morphē "form, shape, figure") - "the maker of shapes" within MATRIX (Old French matrice) - "womb; source". The suggested NEO (new) is what tempts one to ignore perceivable "now".
It ain't neo fighting agents; it's AGENT (enacting) generating reacting resistance through self differentiation aka transmutation of flow into form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka ingredient out of base alchemy aka partial (perceiving) out of whole (perceivable) transmutation.
Instead of suggesting "we are" ask yourself if "one is" because "oneness was" aka one is able to perceive because all perceivable was beforehand. Is there or can there be anything perceivable that doesn't represent energy (internal power)?
Choice adapting to balance aka partial adapting to whole, hence HEAL, verb [Latin celo; Heb. to be whole or entire, all.] which grows resistance of form within flow.
Ignoring to resist as form allows flow to transmute form back to base. The few suggest the many to follow orders instead of resisting the natural order; hence tempting them back to base; which in return allows the few to exploit the lack of resistance among the many.