"Flat Earthers" are wrong #819: water drains clockwise direction in the Northern hemisphere and counterclockwise in the Southern. #itsaglobe
same for stars:
-
look south, stars spin clockwise;
-
look north, stars spin counter-clockwise;
i know flat-earthers explain this with "it's an optical illusion" - lol - which is funny because flat-earthers claim everything about their "model" can be validated with simple observation #oops #fail
but i was just curious if one of you flat-earthers would care to explain the "water drain" phenomenon.... obviously not an "illusion", so you can't use that excuse.
...waiting...
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Coriolis-Effect-Debunks-Flat-Earth-:c
In the mid-19th century, a Frenchman named Gaspard-Gustave Coriolis performed several experiments showing the effect of kinetic energy on rotating systems, which have ever since become mythologized as proof of the heliocentric theory of the cosmos. The “Coriolis Effect” is often said to cause sinks and toilet bowls in the Northern Hemisphere to drain spinning in one direction while in the Southern Hemisphere causing them to spin the opposite way, thus providing proof of the spinning ball-Earth. Once again, however, just like Foucault’s Pendulums spinning either which way, sinks and toilets in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres do not consistently spin in any one direction! Sinks and toilets in the very same household are often found to spin opposite directions, depending entirely upon the shape of the basin and the angle of the water’s entry, not the supposed rotation of the Earth.
and some more: https://odysee.com/@tbiman:8/-The-Coriolis-Effect-with-Cory-Oliver--Episode-025---David-Weiss--Apr-22,-2021-:3
... but flat earthers are the retards, ok lol
sure, you can force a counter-gravitational vortex.
but obviously i am not talking about that - isn't that right, dingleberry ?
stay a retard, i don't care ... i answered you and you still refuse to look at the evidence
lol, some globers are afraid to admit they've been lied to their entire life ... can't handle reality i guess.
here's the counter-evidence ... since you really seem to need it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDorTBEhEtk
#itsaglobe
Just like gravity is just a theory, not a fact or truth although an effect is measurable, it is just a theory
but they teach it as FACT, herein lies the problem ... some just can't believe 'the expert scientists' would lie about that
i'm not the one that asked for answers
Also coriolos is a "inertial or fictitious force that appears to act on a mass..."
For what it's worth, wikipedia article on coriolis says that water does not drain different directions above or below the equator.
wikipedia telling the truth for a change? interesting
I agree, wikipedia isn't a solid source but it does have some useful information. That's why I said for what its worth (which is apparently not a lot)
you dont really think that do you? christ dude... you literilly got that info off the Simpson. you have lost any right to call anyone retarded https://everything2.com/title/Water+goes+down+the+drain+the+same+way+in+Australia
yes :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDorTBEhEtk
#touche
I personally think that the smarter every day channel is paid off or shills for the current narrative. Not to attack you or anything but I can almost see right through that dude. 9 out of 10 scientists agree because the truthers are shunned, demonized or outright killed. Just my opinion.
you should make a debunk video and prove he is wrong.
...waiting...
I don't have to do anything. We are bouncing ideas and having conversation. Getting to the truth, hopefully. Using documents, literature and research. Trust the gov? That's up to you. One thing I always consider is geocentrism has been around a lot longer than heliocentrism. Trust NASA' doctored images from Freemasons and occultists? Its up to you. I've never been high up enough to see what it really looks like and i'd assume you haven't either. Besides CGI and other crap we are forcefully fed. Also water is always flat and level hence "sea level".
don't expect others to do what you are not willing to do. it's hypocritical, and makes you look like an asshole.
true or false:
1 + 1 = 2
Ok so I'm an asshole and my intelligence has been insulted by a simple math problem. I took college math all the way to calc 2. And I have made yt videos although not on this subject. Sorry man but I don't think this is a fruitful conversation anymore. I try to keep it a civilized adult conversation. Hey, we are all taught the same standard stuff in k-12 and I remember most of it. Heck, I remember when Pluto was the 9th planet but scientists agreed to change that. The shape of the earth is a touchy subject and sometimes people can't get their opinions out without confrontation or insults. I'll try to refrain from commenting on your stuff. GG man, have a good day.
you all are invested in the bullshit like the nurses are invested in covid - they can't bring themselves to see that they have been conned with "gotchas".
buddy... there is one way to prove it to yourself once and for all...
https://astronomy.com/news/2020/08/six-ways-to-buy-a-ticket-to-space-in-2021
the only thing standing between you and truth is about $500,000
suggest: crowdfund
title: "Flat Earther seeking to be proven right! (or wrong) - fly me to "space" har har wink wink!"
You could raise that kind of money so fast.
Stop wasting time. Go for it! Document it! Publish to youtube! You'll be famous.
The Flat-Earth™ vs. sextant Challenge - this one offers $500 to the first flat earther who is able to pinpoint her/his position with a sextant:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyLogn0SxR4
waiting again? lol ... you just keep waiting for the truth to punch you in the face
no i just keep waiting for you to answer a simple question:
1 + 1 = 2
True or False
wow, you are so lost, good luck in your false reality, i'm done with you because obviously you only made your post to argue with people, not to learn
Coriolis and Foucault’s Pendulum debunked a long time ago. Long, long time ago.
https://youtu.be/53O1fkG5yOw
define: unscientific
spiller: you can't - i win
The spin of the earth affects water going down a drain but rivers and oceans flow wherever the fuck they want, hahahaha fucking hell you're funny.
you said it much better than i did:
The spin of the earth affects water going down a drain
thank you
No it doesn’t. Not at all.
https://youtu.be/53O1fkG5yOw
Science can't fully explain what god created so maybe there is a different reason for the different spin of water for the earth above and below the equator. A quick google shows differing opinions. Some science shills say yes and others say no. There may be some " I gotchas" supporting the globe but maybe there is more information that is suppressed. Or the earth could be a sphere. There are also " I gotchas" supporting a flat earth. One thing for sure is I don't trust NASA, a governmental agency with a questionable history and questionable employees.
define: equator
prove it
spoiler: you can't! i win
so you believe in science?
i win.
Very true! It divides the earth equally, I get that. It can be true for both a sphere or flat earth. Some of the equations explaining the globe also can explain the flat earth. Not trying to persuade anybody... Just thinking outside the box of modern "science" that has duped us so many times: Vaccine, fluoridated water, chemtrails, global warming, GMO foods with roundup, safe levels of lead and other carcinogens in water, transgenderism, GMO mosquito's, government tests on populations, etc. And a lot of it spins off of mythology and occult practices and beliefs. Kinda gotta be skeptical at least to some degree. Until the next "breakthrough" or new way of thinking comes, and even then, gotta question it.
C+
the equator is the horizontal that is closest to the sun, while the arctics are the furthest from the sun - because it's a globe.
it's warmer at the equator than it is at the arctics - because it's a globe.
Dang man I usually get a's and b's :( Well aren't we taught that the earth is tilted on its axis? So in the globe earth model wouldn't one hemisphere have more sunlight and heat than the other regardless of the equator? Also if the earth is an oblate spheroid, wouldn't the part of the globe that jets out further be closest to the sun? One last thing: wouldn't the sun rays heat be kinda negligible between the northern and southern hemisphere since we are so far away and apparently receive the rays at a similar angle and intensity? Just some food for thought. And I realize that these things are elementary and taught to humans at an early age and well agreed upon by "scientists" since the heliocentric model was adopted around 500 years ago.
So, you're saying that all it would take to make you stop spouting this garbage is a picture from a balloon with the sun overhead?
yes
yes, i believe it does
yes, i believe it does
which is why there is relatively little temperature difference - even between the poles vs the equator.
this seems pretty complete:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adzx547ptck
then it's not "the equator".
if it's another explanation, then you are talking about something else - you'll need to make-up another word for your version of the imaginary line the divides the Earth in half.
"equator" is already taken.
also "inches" "days" and "watts" -- all taken. you'll need different words to describe length, time and energy, respectively.
And you all assume the exact opposite of what "the establishment" says. Equally stupid.
um no, we look at FACTS, not just assume the exact opposite
One more for good measure.
https://youtu.be/aKgpc1LBL1M
Try it yourself with a bowl of water and a hole. They do this scam in equatorial countries for tourists. They will get the water to spin opposite on different sides of an equator sign. The way the water is poured in sets the direction of the spin. I've lived in both hemispheres and the toilet thing is fake. Coriolis effect doesn't exist otherwise planes would have a very tricky job to do. Somehow they claim coriolis effects bullets but not planes, you can't have it both ways.
This demonstrates star trails on flat earth why the south appears that way.
https://youtu.be/xnbs1s8DKVs
you already referenced that video.
go to minute 3:00
https://youtu.be/xnbs1s8DKVs?t=188
the narrator says the stars rotating left to right (south pole) / right to left (north pole) is an optical illusion.
i thought you guys didn't believe in optical illusions - you know the whole horizon thing ? now suddenly you believe in optical illusions again ?
#fail
We do research and understand optics, refraction or the 'horizon thing' as you called it, has a very minimal and inconsistent effect. We view objects far beyond what earth curve or refraction should allow mathematically.
oh well now i am convinced the earth is flat.
so you use math?
true or false: 1 + 1 = 2
1+1 isn't always 2. In your case 1 mom and one dad paired to make a half wit.
hahahah...
ok ... you got me.... i am a "half wit"; therefor, the earth must be flat :)
ps. insults don't help your cult.
Don't stars appear to spin consistent with the procession of their daily cycle? So north of the equator, they appear to spin counterclockwise when looking north. South of the equator, they appear to spin clockwise when looking south. If that is correct, then the stars are all moving across the sky in the same direction?! One would have to be in the south of the equator looking north to observe a counter clockwise apparent motion of the stars. Is this correct/does this make sense?
yes, but the point that the flat earthers are trying to make:
the "water drain" stuff is difficult to duplicate;
the "star spin" - they say - is caused by a reflection off the dome that covers flat earth - i'm not joking.
Lol some people go a little too far. Either way, I'm not 100 % convinced flat or globe. I've been taught the regular narrative but it doesn't really resonate with me as I think critically about where we are and what we are and what we are told is fact. It's a journey and there are haters on both sides. I'm in the middle... Some things make sense for flat and some things make sense for globe in my mind.
what part "doesn't really resonate" with you ?
in your "gut" you mean... some of the science stuff doesn't "feel" right, is what you are saying? :) lol
Basically right. I can't accept it from a freemason either. And it kinda contradicts the bible. So I am torn at the moment
https://odysee.com/@psalm19:6/IMPOSSIBALL-Flat-Earth-Documentary-2017:4?r=7mnmEgrDzdfjfufbBEU5JRgGXrq2dz3V
this is a really good documentary ... but to answer your question go about 1hr and 2 minutes in. but worth an entire watch ... and i'm not talking to the op ... i'm done with that
this reply is for anyone else that comes here looking for answers to the question that was asked here
At the equator there is zero spin.
and there you have it folks... zero spin at the equator, but magically the rest of the planet spins.
riiiiiiiiiiiight
Water. For clarification.
Water does not spin in a funnel drain at the equator.
Neither counter nor counter clockwise. It simply runs down the sides.
I'm convinced the overwhelming majority of "flat earthers" are just trolling, and the rest are certainly not worth arguing with.
What I can't reconcile, is how we can see objects that should be blocked by the earth itself due to its supposed curvature
There's other evidence that contradicts the spinning globe model but the distant objects evidence is hard to wrap my mind around
Sphere with a 3959 mile average radius, we are told
This means on the surface of the sphere, and this is a simplified formula but is accurate up to hundreds of miles, but on the surface we should see a drop of 8 inches per mile, squared
8 inches after one mile 32 inches after two miles 72 inches after three miles, etc
When I go out to the shoreline and look across to a distant island, I can see everything, including the shoreline on the island
What I'm seeing should be blocked from my view due to the curve of the earth, and there's just no arguing against what I see with my own eyes
It does not reconcile with what we should expect to see, if this is a ball with an average radius of 3959 miles
There's videos of others performing the same observation across much greater distances, across spans of water, which is important because we know water finds and maintains its level in whatever container its in
We also have so many large famous flatlands around the "globe"
Earth surface is a minimum 70% covered in water, so, where's all of this supposed curvature?
Did something about my comment give you the impression I believed the spinning globe fairy tale
If there's no curve on the Earth, why can't you see New York from the Rockies?
common question! you can increase your viewable distance by increasing your optical power, i.e., binoculars or a telescope, or your altitude, but at some point you are going to be bottlenecked by the density of the atmosphere itself
the air, water vapour, etc
Maybe our crater is flat inside this huge hollow Earth dome....boom just covered it all for use frikkin guys :P:P
See examples in the replies...
paid to troll
i.e., shilling
prove it
Go to a flat earth convention and realize that not one of them was stupid enough to get the covid shots or follow plandemic regulations. Do not go to 'flat earth society' meetups, they are government funded shills. You are too far gone to ever overcome the globe deception unfortunately.
neither did i
what's your point?
Draining would be more dependent on differences between sinks. The stars are much better evidence. If you're in the southern hemisphere they are inverted
agreed, the difference is very slight.