"Flat Earthers" are wrong #819: water drains clockwise direction in the Northern hemisphere and counterclockwise in the Southern. #itsaglobe
same for stars:
-
look south, stars spin clockwise;
-
look north, stars spin counter-clockwise;
i know flat-earthers explain this with "it's an optical illusion" - lol - which is funny because flat-earthers claim everything about their "model" can be validated with simple observation #oops #fail
but i was just curious if one of you flat-earthers would care to explain the "water drain" phenomenon.... obviously not an "illusion", so you can't use that excuse.
...waiting...
define: equator
prove it
spoiler: you can't! i win
so you believe in science?
i win.
Very true! It divides the earth equally, I get that. It can be true for both a sphere or flat earth. Some of the equations explaining the globe also can explain the flat earth. Not trying to persuade anybody... Just thinking outside the box of modern "science" that has duped us so many times: Vaccine, fluoridated water, chemtrails, global warming, GMO foods with roundup, safe levels of lead and other carcinogens in water, transgenderism, GMO mosquito's, government tests on populations, etc. And a lot of it spins off of mythology and occult practices and beliefs. Kinda gotta be skeptical at least to some degree. Until the next "breakthrough" or new way of thinking comes, and even then, gotta question it.
C+
the equator is the horizontal that is closest to the sun, while the arctics are the furthest from the sun - because it's a globe.
it's warmer at the equator than it is at the arctics - because it's a globe.
Dang man I usually get a's and b's :( Well aren't we taught that the earth is tilted on its axis? So in the globe earth model wouldn't one hemisphere have more sunlight and heat than the other regardless of the equator? Also if the earth is an oblate spheroid, wouldn't the part of the globe that jets out further be closest to the sun? One last thing: wouldn't the sun rays heat be kinda negligible between the northern and southern hemisphere since we are so far away and apparently receive the rays at a similar angle and intensity? Just some food for thought. And I realize that these things are elementary and taught to humans at an early age and well agreed upon by "scientists" since the heliocentric model was adopted around 500 years ago.
yes
yes, i believe it does
yes, i believe it does
which is why there is relatively little temperature difference - even between the poles vs the equator.
this seems pretty complete:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adzx547ptck
then it's not "the equator".
if it's another explanation, then you are talking about something else - you'll need to make-up another word for your version of the imaginary line the divides the Earth in half.
"equator" is already taken.
also "inches" "days" and "watts" -- all taken. you'll need different words to describe length, time and energy, respectively.
And you all assume the exact opposite of what "the establishment" says. Equally stupid.