Conspiracy Theory:
A group of FBI faggots is purposely spreading this made up story as part of a forum sliding campaign to suppress real information. This message is being repeated by mockingbirds on Patriots. Win , Twitter, Reddit, and likely other forums as well.
The facts are:
-Ivermectin works.
-NIH knows ivermectin works.
-The mockingbirds know that the web page in the screenshot has had ivermectin listed as a Covid treatment for two years now.
-The mockingbirds know that this is not new information by any stretch of their imagination.
-This news is old.
-Not only is it old, it’s being misrepresented.
-If you go to the website in the screenshot and click on Ivermectin , you will see for yourself that the NIH website in the screenshot is going to tell you that Ivermectin is NOT RECOMMENDED BY NIH UNLESS ITS FOR THE PURPOSE OF A CONTROLLED STUDY.
-This is not because NIH thinks Ivermectin don’t work, they know it does, they are just Pharma shills.
ivermectin never did anything for covid... we all have covid floating around in our bodies by now, its activated by cell/wifi pulses aimed specifically at you: ie, if you've "had covid", you're a targeted individual, for whatever reason.
1984 revisionist history. Soon it will be us who is said to have demonized ivermectin. To the memory hole with it all.
Imagine that!
Things that make you go...hmmm?
Conspiracy Theory: A group of FBI faggots is purposely spreading this made up story as part of a forum sliding campaign to suppress real information. This message is being repeated by mockingbirds on Patriots. Win , Twitter, Reddit, and likely other forums as well.
The facts are: -Ivermectin works. -NIH knows ivermectin works. -The mockingbirds know that the web page in the screenshot has had ivermectin listed as a Covid treatment for two years now. -The mockingbirds know that this is not new information by any stretch of their imagination. -This news is old. -Not only is it old, it’s being misrepresented. -If you go to the website in the screenshot and click on Ivermectin , you will see for yourself that the NIH website in the screenshot is going to tell you that Ivermectin is NOT RECOMMENDED BY NIH UNLESS ITS FOR THE PURPOSE OF A CONTROLLED STUDY. -This is not because NIH thinks Ivermectin don’t work, they know it does, they are just Pharma shills.
yea, all good points and questions...
source? i mean... you seem pretty sure of yourself on this one. are you able to back-up this claim in some way?
until you can reasonably show me otherwise:
someone threatened the NIH (not likely)
organic procedure (more likely)
Exactly.
And therefor, we can reasonably conclude it's not "part of the act".
I view this re-acknowledgement of ivermectin as evidence of organic process / pressures on the (multiple and often competing) acts at play.
because not everyone is in on it...
Fauci (and inner circles) made ivermectin illegal to treat COVID™ because of one or two "new" studies that cast some doubt of ivermectin's efficacy.
But now those studies are being officially debunked - by authentic academics outside of DC - because not everyone is in on it.
lies need to be maintained, otherwise truth surfaces pretty naturally.
#winning - by default :)
"95% of what is conducted in plots are to promote animosity for a response so as to create a counter narrative"
apply your own argument to ivermectin, shit never worked in the first place
which raises the possibility / eventuality of multiple acts.
ok capt'n crunch - good luck with your plans
It's been there since last year.
ivermectin never did anything for covid... we all have covid floating around in our bodies by now, its activated by cell/wifi pulses aimed specifically at you: ie, if you've "had covid", you're a targeted individual, for whatever reason.