23 () posted 3 years ago by pkvi 3 years ago by pkvi +24 / -1 10 comments share 10 comments share save hide report block hide replies
yea, all good points and questions...
source? i mean... you seem pretty sure of yourself on this one. are you able to back-up this claim in some way?
until you can reasonably show me otherwise:
someone threatened the NIH (not likely)
organic procedure (more likely)
Exactly.
And therefor, we can reasonably conclude it's not "part of the act".
I view this re-acknowledgement of ivermectin as evidence of organic process / pressures on the (multiple and often competing) acts at play.
because not everyone is in on it...
Fauci (and inner circles) made ivermectin illegal to treat COVID™ because of one or two "new" studies that cast some doubt of ivermectin's efficacy.
But now those studies are being officially debunked - by authentic academics outside of DC - because not everyone is in on it.
lies need to be maintained, otherwise truth surfaces pretty naturally.
#winning - by default :)
"95% of what is conducted in plots are to promote animosity for a response so as to create a counter narrative"
apply your own argument to ivermectin, shit never worked in the first place
which raises the possibility / eventuality of multiple acts.
ok capt'n crunch - good luck with your plans