If the water stays in the bucket then you must admit that water doesn't always find its level downward. You must also admit that water can be acted on by forces other than pressure, as you conveniently forgot to mention in your post. In this example the water finds its level in the direction of acceleration (the bottom of the bucket).
If water can be acted on by acceleration is it such a leap to accept that all the water on earth that is apparently level, is being accelerated downward by some force?
If you visualize a sphere with the direction of acceleration toward its center, instead of outward like the bucket, you can visualize a how water could bend around a sphere.
If you can't complete this simple thought experiment you may be too afraid to trust yourself.
If water can stick to a bucket bottom under acceleration why can't it stick to a globe under acceleration? Obviously the direction of acceleration is not the same in these two cases, but in the case of the earth the centrifugal force is negligible and is far outweighed by the acceleration due to gravity.
The container was an example I used to show that water is affected by acceleration. You keep getting stuck on the direction of the acceleration. What if a stationary ball with very high mass had an acceleration pointing toward its center? Would the water stick to it then?
The centrifugal force of the earth is negligible because it's angular speed is very small. It revolves only once every 24 hours. You have confused linear speed with rotational speed. Try spinning a ball 1 revolution per day and see how much centrifugal force it has.
As for winds, that's another easy explanation if you think about it. The atmosphere is rotating with the land due to friction. Air behaves like a very thin fluid. Try putting water in a bucket and then spinning the bucket on its vertical axis... after a little while the water will be spinning with the bucket.
You keep telling telling me to do the math, but something tells me YOU haven't done the math.
You got all those degrees and still didn't learn how to do math? Sounds like you wasted your money and time.
Here, I'll give you the equation for centrifugal force and what the variables are and you can tell me how much centrifugal force the "spinning ball" earth has on you.
F = (m*v²)/r.
Force (F) - how much force the the earth's spin pushes you away from it.
mass (m) - mass of the object, your body, for instance, 180 pounds.
tangential velocity (v) - linear velocity of the surface, you gave 1000 mph.
radius (r) - radius of the earth, approx. 4000 miles.
It sounds like you're just afraid to trust yourself. I explained gravity is just an acceleration force, it's not magic. Earth's gravity has been measured at 9.8 m/s². You can feel the earth pushing back on your body, preventing you from traveling downward.
You have been lied to but not by the physics professors. It's not your fault for going down the wrong rabbit hole. Not everything is a conspiracy. There are precious few facts we can rely on these days, but modern physics is still reliable. It's unfortunate that you're living in the world you're living in, but I understand.
“It has been found that the best time to institute tyranny, is in the nursery.”
This is one of the reasons that we are steeped in the globe mythology so terribly young. It conditions/trains us to deny our own experience/observation and reasoning ability and instead always appeal (abjectly) to “authority” that “knows better”. It makes us better slaves, aka citizens.
The scientific laws of hydrostatics have stood essentially unchallenged for more than 3 centuries. (Liquid) Water cannot, by its very nature, curve convexly while at rest in the manner the globe model requires. To force it to do so against its nature (and arguably against the “at rest” caveat in the laws of hydrostatics) would require fantastic amounts of limitless energy. Fundamentally this is the flaw (sadly, by no means the only one, mind you) that newton introduced into physics with his magical christian god gravity. W = mg, mathematically describes matter perpetually accelerating in order to have weight. Things cannot perpetually accelerate. That is a fundamental violation of the conservation of energy, an example of perpetual motion, and just plain stupid. Where would the infinite energy even come from? Sure it would be nice if such infinite energy existed for us to harness, but it is clearly fantasy.
I encourage those interested in this subject to join us to further explore and exchange our views on it over at flatearthresearch!
You are freaking insane. Curvature on the horizon is dropping insignificantly. Not 8 inches per mile. Where did you come up with that crap. There is no math behind that claim. How did you sit there and write that crap without actually figuring out what the curvature is. Laughable there are people that dumb. It is remarkable there are people that fucking stupid writing complete bullshit and claiming they did some math. You freaking dumbass, the dumbest. Stop bombarding this forum with bullshit and go and study math. Come back and tell me what the curvature is.
Because it is something like a 1454 ft high building after around 70 miles 4ft becomes obstructed from view if you could even identify the change. You're still seeing 1450 ft from about 70 miles away. This is curvature. At freaking ground level hahaha hahaha, almost immeasurable, like it's not even a digit, not even the smallest digit.
Again there is gravity, nothing has disappeared. Just an assumption that you can't see the change in angle.
Not the crap you're spouting. Vile demon. You have no math, summoning you.
I asked for the equation not your bullshit. You're dumber than a sack of sand.
I asked you to do math not link me shit. How did you write. You wrote it nobody else, the earth loses 8 inches every mile? How did you, you wrote it, figure that out?
Simple math not stupidity.
The link posted the idiot has done crap math, literally a dumbass, the biggest dumbass on the planet. It is complete and utter bullshit.
8 inches per mile squared, squared, and it equates at ground level fuck all. Not eight inches. It's squared.
I asked for you to produce rational thought not yea here it is. Look I um done it. Cos somebody else told me it.
We're done here you people are all dumb and quite stupid. Look at those links.
Go bring some more children to Epstein you fucking fed
beliefs
That's not how any of this works
libetard
Like your shill ass didn't vote for Biden
defends its position by ignoring other ideas
So explain the discrepancy between flat and spherical math. Throw away your GPS phone , get a "fLaT" map, and go on a 10 mile hike without accounting for spherical math. See how fucking lost you get. Be sure to take lots of pictures for when someone finds your corpse then whoever finds you can post your dumbass findings.
decided all things flat earth must be psy op CIA agents
You think the agency would trust a retard like you? You can't do anything right.
If you put some water in a bucket and quickly swing it around in a circle does the water find it's level and spill out or does it stay in the bucket?
If the water stays in the bucket then you must admit that water doesn't always find its level downward. You must also admit that water can be acted on by forces other than pressure, as you conveniently forgot to mention in your post. In this example the water finds its level in the direction of acceleration (the bottom of the bucket).
If water can be acted on by acceleration is it such a leap to accept that all the water on earth that is apparently level, is being accelerated downward by some force?
If you visualize a sphere with the direction of acceleration toward its center, instead of outward like the bucket, you can visualize a how water could bend around a sphere.
If you can't complete this simple thought experiment you may be too afraid to trust yourself.
If water can stick to a bucket bottom under acceleration why can't it stick to a globe under acceleration? Obviously the direction of acceleration is not the same in these two cases, but in the case of the earth the centrifugal force is negligible and is far outweighed by the acceleration due to gravity.
The container was an example I used to show that water is affected by acceleration. You keep getting stuck on the direction of the acceleration. What if a stationary ball with very high mass had an acceleration pointing toward its center? Would the water stick to it then?
The centrifugal force of the earth is negligible because it's angular speed is very small. It revolves only once every 24 hours. You have confused linear speed with rotational speed. Try spinning a ball 1 revolution per day and see how much centrifugal force it has.
As for winds, that's another easy explanation if you think about it. The atmosphere is rotating with the land due to friction. Air behaves like a very thin fluid. Try putting water in a bucket and then spinning the bucket on its vertical axis... after a little while the water will be spinning with the bucket.
You keep telling telling me to do the math, but something tells me YOU haven't done the math.
You got all those degrees and still didn't learn how to do math? Sounds like you wasted your money and time.
Here, I'll give you the equation for centrifugal force and what the variables are and you can tell me how much centrifugal force the "spinning ball" earth has on you.
F = (m*v²)/r.
Force (F) - how much force the the earth's spin pushes you away from it.
mass (m) - mass of the object, your body, for instance, 180 pounds.
tangential velocity (v) - linear velocity of the surface, you gave 1000 mph.
radius (r) - radius of the earth, approx. 4000 miles.
I'll wait, Master's Degree.
It sounds like you're just afraid to trust yourself. I explained gravity is just an acceleration force, it's not magic. Earth's gravity has been measured at 9.8 m/s². You can feel the earth pushing back on your body, preventing you from traveling downward.
You have been lied to but not by the physics professors. It's not your fault for going down the wrong rabbit hole. Not everything is a conspiracy. There are precious few facts we can rely on these days, but modern physics is still reliable. It's unfortunate that you're living in the world you're living in, but I understand.
“It has been found that the best time to institute tyranny, is in the nursery.”
This is one of the reasons that we are steeped in the globe mythology so terribly young. It conditions/trains us to deny our own experience/observation and reasoning ability and instead always appeal (abjectly) to “authority” that “knows better”. It makes us better slaves, aka citizens.
The scientific laws of hydrostatics have stood essentially unchallenged for more than 3 centuries. (Liquid) Water cannot, by its very nature, curve convexly while at rest in the manner the globe model requires. To force it to do so against its nature (and arguably against the “at rest” caveat in the laws of hydrostatics) would require fantastic amounts of limitless energy. Fundamentally this is the flaw (sadly, by no means the only one, mind you) that newton introduced into physics with his magical christian god gravity. W = mg, mathematically describes matter perpetually accelerating in order to have weight. Things cannot perpetually accelerate. That is a fundamental violation of the conservation of energy, an example of perpetual motion, and just plain stupid. Where would the infinite energy even come from? Sure it would be nice if such infinite energy existed for us to harness, but it is clearly fantasy.
I encourage those interested in this subject to join us to further explore and exchange our views on it over at flatearthresearch!
Fucking nutter.
At microgravity, fluids form spheres around a gravitational point. Water even moreso due to its incredibly strong surface tension.
This includes gasses and liquid rock.
The science is and has been settled.
Fucking nutter.
You are freaking insane. Curvature on the horizon is dropping insignificantly. Not 8 inches per mile. Where did you come up with that crap. There is no math behind that claim. How did you sit there and write that crap without actually figuring out what the curvature is. Laughable there are people that dumb. It is remarkable there are people that fucking stupid writing complete bullshit and claiming they did some math. You freaking dumbass, the dumbest. Stop bombarding this forum with bullshit and go and study math. Come back and tell me what the curvature is.
Because it is something like a 1454 ft high building after around 70 miles 4ft becomes obstructed from view if you could even identify the change. You're still seeing 1450 ft from about 70 miles away. This is curvature. At freaking ground level hahaha hahaha, almost immeasurable, like it's not even a digit, not even the smallest digit.
Again there is gravity, nothing has disappeared. Just an assumption that you can't see the change in angle.
Not the crap you're spouting. Vile demon. You have no math, summoning you.
You haven't full stop, yes I have. You are dumber than a mule. I am not watching bullshit. You are brainwashed. Watch this. Is called brainwashing.
I told you come back with math. You linked bullshit.
How did you calculate a 8 inch drop per mile? Off somebody telling you crap. Hahaha.
Come back with the math.
I asked for the equation not your bullshit. You're dumber than a sack of sand.
I asked you to do math not link me shit. How did you write. You wrote it nobody else, the earth loses 8 inches every mile? How did you, you wrote it, figure that out?
Simple math not stupidity.
The link posted the idiot has done crap math, literally a dumbass, the biggest dumbass on the planet. It is complete and utter bullshit.
8 inches per mile squared, squared, and it equates at ground level fuck all. Not eight inches. It's squared.
I asked for you to produce rational thought not yea here it is. Look I um done it. Cos somebody else told me it.
We're done here you people are all dumb and quite stupid. Look at those links.
8 inches per mile, squared. Find it. You can't be that stupid. Sure I can post the correct math. But you're claiming you did math. You didn't
Hey, I made a post for you too
https://conspiracies.win/p/15JTpBF6hN/
ooOooOooOOoo
Go bring some more children to Epstein you fucking fed
That's not how any of this works
Like your shill ass didn't vote for Biden
So explain the discrepancy between flat and spherical math. Throw away your GPS phone , get a "fLaT" map, and go on a 10 mile hike without accounting for spherical math. See how fucking lost you get. Be sure to take lots of pictures for when someone finds your corpse then whoever finds you can post your dumbass findings.
You think the agency would trust a retard like you? You can't do anything right.
YOU'RE simple
Gps doesn't use satellites? What do they use then, fairies? Fuck off FEd