Natural law is expressing itself; those within need to resist it through compressing (comprehension) of impressing (perceivable); yet are tempted to want to repress themselves by collecting impressions aka mentally upheld information; suggestible to each other.
You chose to view suggested information as code; I utilize perceivable inspiration to decode the suggested information others encode (through gematria; rhetoric; inversion; contradiction etc.).
free-will-of-choice is...
...whatever one chooses it to be.
trump
TRUMP, verb - "to blow a trumpet; to reduce to the last expedient, or to the utmost exertion of power". Resist the temptation to be misused as an instrument played by the suggestions of others, hence exerting yourself, and adapt to be the instrument within the perceivable source of sound.
to his followers
Living within the natural order of dying (being moved from inception towards death) implies the need to resist the temptation to follow the suggested orders by others. Life isn't outcome oriented (death is predefined at inception); life represents adaptation to origin; hence being resistance within velocity. Others use suggestion to tempt one to ignore resisting.
to send
This should be self explanatory (towards sends); alas ignorance is bliss. Forward motion represents the only source of all perceivable inspiration incoming. All within send inspiration represent resend aka RE (response to) SEND (sending origin).
"tell" implies the want for suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
"us" ignores being the one with free will of choice at the center of everything perceivable.
"more" implies having already fell for the temptation of want (suggested) over need (perceivable); hence now wanting more; based on reduced resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
The whole code (collected law) represents perceivable inspiration. This whole self differentiates into perceiving partial with lack of comprehension. Therefore comprehension can be grown by adaptation to perceivable inspiration. All the encoding and decoding is based on suggested information held within memory.
For example math...the few suggest problems to tempt the many to seek solutions. What the many ignore is that living within the process of dying represents being the temporary problem within the ongoing natural solution. Mathematical problems can then be encoded and decoded within the ignorant many by the suggestions of the parasitic few.
Look around you and tell me what problems math solved so far? How is it that the few suggest that the solution to the problems with the many is fewer of them? And vice versa btw (just look at the JQ). While both sides are trying to reduce each other into rubble; I try to express my comprehension as choice at the center of a balance based system about anything fed into loss (dying) generating growth (living).
If - iff - you read any of his/its/the bot's ramblings you would then see that it is Idea B5 randomly connected to Idea 97b randomly connected to a moronic wordplay randomly connect to . . .
RAN'DOM, noun - "motion or course without direction"
How could life; while being moved from inception towards death, be moving without direction? What if life represents reaction within direction aka reactors within a directing generator?
two
Take any "two" things and for you to be able to perceive them implies each "one" of them to exist within a different position. One cannot perceive "two"; other ones can suggest one to count other ones as "two" or 33, 666; 911; 6000000 etc.
The more one counts others; the more one ignores what counts...oneself.
How could free will of choice express itself when presiding over the choices of others? Following leaders represents the temptation to ignore being resistance within the natural order.
Umm no
Gonna pass that? No double toking.
🤣
No, fwc isn't Trump and Kilo isn't Trump.
Natural law is expressing itself; those within need to resist it through compressing (comprehension) of impressing (perceivable); yet are tempted to want to repress themselves by collecting impressions aka mentally upheld information; suggestible to each other.
You chose to view suggested information as code; I utilize perceivable inspiration to decode the suggested information others encode (through gematria; rhetoric; inversion; contradiction etc.).
...whatever one chooses it to be.
TRUMP, verb - "to blow a trumpet; to reduce to the last expedient, or to the utmost exertion of power". Resist the temptation to be misused as an instrument played by the suggestions of others, hence exerting yourself, and adapt to be the instrument within the perceivable source of sound.
Living within the natural order of dying (being moved from inception towards death) implies the need to resist the temptation to follow the suggested orders by others. Life isn't outcome oriented (death is predefined at inception); life represents adaptation to origin; hence being resistance within velocity. Others use suggestion to tempt one to ignore resisting.
This should be self explanatory (towards sends); alas ignorance is bliss. Forward motion represents the only source of all perceivable inspiration incoming. All within send inspiration represent resend aka RE (response to) SEND (sending origin).
"tell" implies the want for suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
"us" ignores being the one with free will of choice at the center of everything perceivable.
"more" implies having already fell for the temptation of want (suggested) over need (perceivable); hence now wanting more; based on reduced resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
The whole code (collected law) represents perceivable inspiration. This whole self differentiates into perceiving partial with lack of comprehension. Therefore comprehension can be grown by adaptation to perceivable inspiration. All the encoding and decoding is based on suggested information held within memory.
For example math...the few suggest problems to tempt the many to seek solutions. What the many ignore is that living within the process of dying represents being the temporary problem within the ongoing natural solution. Mathematical problems can then be encoded and decoded within the ignorant many by the suggestions of the parasitic few.
Look around you and tell me what problems math solved so far? How is it that the few suggest that the solution to the problems with the many is fewer of them? And vice versa btw (just look at the JQ). While both sides are trying to reduce each other into rubble; I try to express my comprehension as choice at the center of a balance based system about anything fed into loss (dying) generating growth (living).
Free will of choice isn't a bot, but is a human who uses a language generator program. Occasionally he breaks character.
That "user" is quite obviously a gpt-3 bot.
Dude the guy has IQ 140 and DJT is at subzero level.
Winners dont do drugs. Just stop
u/free-will-of-choice can hardly string two ideas together.
If - iff - you read any of his/its/the bot's ramblings you would then see that it is Idea B5 randomly connected to Idea 97b randomly connected to a moronic wordplay randomly connect to . . .
How could life; while being moved from inception towards death, be moving without direction? What if life represents reaction within direction aka reactors within a directing generator?
Take any "two" things and for you to be able to perceive them implies each "one" of them to exist within a different position. One cannot perceive "two"; other ones can suggest one to count other ones as "two" or 33, 666; 911; 6000000 etc.
The more one counts others; the more one ignores what counts...oneself.
How could free will of choice express itself when presiding over the choices of others? Following leaders represents the temptation to ignore being resistance within the natural order.