Natural law is expressing itself; those within need to resist it through compressing (comprehension) of impressing (perceivable); yet are tempted to want to repress themselves by collecting impressions aka mentally upheld information; suggestible to each other.
You chose to view suggested information as code; I utilize perceivable inspiration to decode the suggested information others encode (through gematria; rhetoric; inversion; contradiction etc.).
free-will-of-choice is...
...whatever one chooses it to be.
trump
TRUMP, verb - "to blow a trumpet; to reduce to the last expedient, or to the utmost exertion of power". Resist the temptation to be misused as an instrument played by the suggestions of others, hence exerting yourself, and adapt to be the instrument within the perceivable source of sound.
to his followers
Living within the natural order of dying (being moved from inception towards death) implies the need to resist the temptation to follow the suggested orders by others. Life isn't outcome oriented (death is predefined at inception); life represents adaptation to origin; hence being resistance within velocity. Others use suggestion to tempt one to ignore resisting.
to send
This should be self explanatory (towards sends); alas ignorance is bliss. Forward motion represents the only source of all perceivable inspiration incoming. All within send inspiration represent resend aka RE (response to) SEND (sending origin).
"tell" implies the want for suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
"us" ignores being the one with free will of choice at the center of everything perceivable.
"more" implies having already fell for the temptation of want (suggested) over need (perceivable); hence now wanting more; based on reduced resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
The whole code (collected law) represents perceivable inspiration. This whole self differentiates into perceiving partial with lack of comprehension. Therefore comprehension can be grown by adaptation to perceivable inspiration. All the encoding and decoding is based on suggested information held within memory.
For example math...the few suggest problems to tempt the many to seek solutions. What the many ignore is that living within the process of dying represents being the temporary problem within the ongoing natural solution. Mathematical problems can then be encoded and decoded within the ignorant many by the suggestions of the parasitic few.
Look around you and tell me what problems math solved so far? How is it that the few suggest that the solution to the problems with the many is fewer of them? And vice versa btw (just look at the JQ). While both sides are trying to reduce each other into rubble; I try to express my comprehension as choice at the center of a balance based system about anything fed into loss (dying) generating growth (living).
Natural law is expressing itself; those within need to resist it through compressing (comprehension) of impressing (perceivable); yet are tempted to want to repress themselves by collecting impressions aka mentally upheld information; suggestible to each other.
You chose to view suggested information as code; I utilize perceivable inspiration to decode the suggested information others encode (through gematria; rhetoric; inversion; contradiction etc.).
...whatever one chooses it to be.
TRUMP, verb - "to blow a trumpet; to reduce to the last expedient, or to the utmost exertion of power". Resist the temptation to be misused as an instrument played by the suggestions of others, hence exerting yourself, and adapt to be the instrument within the perceivable source of sound.
Living within the natural order of dying (being moved from inception towards death) implies the need to resist the temptation to follow the suggested orders by others. Life isn't outcome oriented (death is predefined at inception); life represents adaptation to origin; hence being resistance within velocity. Others use suggestion to tempt one to ignore resisting.
This should be self explanatory (towards sends); alas ignorance is bliss. Forward motion represents the only source of all perceivable inspiration incoming. All within send inspiration represent resend aka RE (response to) SEND (sending origin).
"tell" implies the want for suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
"us" ignores being the one with free will of choice at the center of everything perceivable.
"more" implies having already fell for the temptation of want (suggested) over need (perceivable); hence now wanting more; based on reduced resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
The whole code (collected law) represents perceivable inspiration. This whole self differentiates into perceiving partial with lack of comprehension. Therefore comprehension can be grown by adaptation to perceivable inspiration. All the encoding and decoding is based on suggested information held within memory.
For example math...the few suggest problems to tempt the many to seek solutions. What the many ignore is that living within the process of dying represents being the temporary problem within the ongoing natural solution. Mathematical problems can then be encoded and decoded within the ignorant many by the suggestions of the parasitic few.
Look around you and tell me what problems math solved so far? How is it that the few suggest that the solution to the problems with the many is fewer of them? And vice versa btw (just look at the JQ). While both sides are trying to reduce each other into rubble; I try to express my comprehension as choice at the center of a balance based system about anything fed into loss (dying) generating growth (living).