"tell" implies the want for suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
"us" ignores being the one with free will of choice at the center of everything perceivable.
"more" implies having already fell for the temptation of want (suggested) over need (perceivable); hence now wanting more; based on reduced resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
The whole code (collected law) represents perceivable inspiration. This whole self differentiates into perceiving partial with lack of comprehension. Therefore comprehension can be grown by adaptation to perceivable inspiration. All the encoding and decoding is based on suggested information held within memory.
For example math...the few suggest problems to tempt the many to seek solutions. What the many ignore is that living within the process of dying represents being the temporary problem within the ongoing natural solution. Mathematical problems can then be encoded and decoded within the ignorant many by the suggestions of the parasitic few.
Look around you and tell me what problems math solved so far? How is it that the few suggest that the solution to the problems with the many is fewer of them? And vice versa btw (just look at the JQ). While both sides are trying to reduce each other into rubble; I try to express my comprehension as choice at the center of a balance based system about anything fed into loss (dying) generating growth (living).
"tell" implies the want for suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
"us" ignores being the one with free will of choice at the center of everything perceivable.
"more" implies having already fell for the temptation of want (suggested) over need (perceivable); hence now wanting more; based on reduced resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
The whole code (collected law) represents perceivable inspiration. This whole self differentiates into perceiving partial with lack of comprehension. Therefore comprehension can be grown by adaptation to perceivable inspiration. All the encoding and decoding is based on suggested information held within memory.
For example math...the few suggest problems to tempt the many to seek solutions. What the many ignore is that living within the process of dying represents being the temporary problem within the ongoing natural solution. Mathematical problems can then be encoded and decoded within the ignorant many by the suggestions of the parasitic few.
Look around you and tell me what problems math solved so far? How is it that the few suggest that the solution to the problems with the many is fewer of them? And vice versa btw (just look at the JQ). While both sides are trying to reduce each other into rubble; I try to express my comprehension as choice at the center of a balance based system about anything fed into loss (dying) generating growth (living).