Leftism and Mental Illness: New Statistical Evidence
(thuletide.wordpress.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
a) yet you aren't doing it...correct vs incorrect and left vs right represent a rebrand of wanting vs not wanting the suggested information by others (shills or not shills).
b) getting out of the PARADIGM, noun [Greek example, to show.] requires resisting the temptation to consent to others suggesting you "shown examples" for what's already perceivable within nature.
As long as you're stuck within reason (left versus right conflict); you ignore as choice at the center of perceivable balance (left/right) any choice made towards the left implies coming from the right and vice versa. No conflict within balance (left/right) unless ignored (left vs right).
c) the want to "get out" tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to being (living) within (process of dying).
You make the choice to view the suggestions of others as being able to "define" the perceivable reality. Suggestion cannot define; since perceivable implies predefined input. If you suggest "this is...."; then you fell for the temptation to ignore that it was before you could make suggestions about it. Everything already is; you represent one thing (perceiving) within everything (perceivable).
Your choice to reason if others are or aren't shills keeps you inside the bubble of reasoning over suggested information (fiction); hence divided among others; instead of being the partial expressing oneself within the whole.
Others suggest points (outcome orientation aka suggested progressivism) to tempt you to want suggested outcomes; while ignoring to adapt to perceivable origin. The living cannot get away from the process of dying; since they exist temporarily (form) at the center (momentum) of the ongoing (flow).
a) commonwealth (republic) implies the perceivable (all value) for each perceiving it (ones evaluation).
b) the parasitic few suggest values (representative government) to tempt each one (evaluation of the perceiving) to ignore the commonwealth (perceivable value). Representation implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which represents the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
c) consenting to contract law established within the minds (establishment) of the many the submission of choice to the suggesting choices of the few; hence making them the "chosen ones" aka the "elite" (selection; choice).
a) agreement vs disagreement represents once again a rebranding of want vs not want reasoning over suggested information.
b) conflict doesn't represent communication; but miscommunication (imbalance) caused by ignoring to adapt to origin (balance).
NEXUS; noun - "that which ties or binds together" in regard to want (collection) over need (expression) represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka RELIGION; noun (Latin religo) - "to bind anew".
The original bond under natural law represents being "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom; hence being temporarily free (living) within ongoing dominance (dying).
Ongoing flow (inception towards death) causes temporary form (life) aka enacting flow drives form; forms reaction shapes itself within.
Aka being IN SANUS (within sound) PER SONOS (by sound) and hence in response to the perceivable source of sound as resonance (need) or dissonance (want). Consenting to suggested words (insane person) over perceivable sound (being within and by sound) tempts one to ignore communication with origin (resonance) for miscommunication (dissonance) among others.
The water allegory (washing) implies the brain to represent a vessel (form) within motion (flow). That's the sleight of hand for those who ignore the ongoing (perceivable) for the affixed (suggestion); hence burdening their brains (memory) with suggested information (idolatry).
a) suggested progressivism tempts the living to ignore resisting the natural order of dying; hence being tempted to go with the flow.
b) the parasitic few suggest progressivism to direct the self destructive ignorance of the many through a narrated (suggested information) perspective; as to tempt them to ignore the consequences of their choices.
Mostly this is being done by tempting the many who ignore response-ability (choice) to blame others for the consequences. This is how the few can shape the conflict of reason (want vs not want) by rebranding it into poor vs rich; believers vs non-believers; true vs false; this -ism vs that -ism: vaxxed vs unvaxxed; pro-life vs pro-choice; Russia vs Ukraine; Biden vs Trump; donut vs bagel etc. Suddenly others can be blamed easily for ones own choice of wanting vs not wanting suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
And here you represent the most effective soldier of the parasitic few...one of the ignorant many who perpetuates suggested progressivism to all the others willingly. You suggesting progressivism represents the allegory of the "Pied Piper of Hamelin"; because you tempt others to follow your lute (suggestion) towards the cliff (death) of progressing life.
If you are alive and being moved from inception towards death, then do you need to seek progression or do you need to resist being progressed towards death? Is this hard to comprehend or could it be way easier to ignore?
How many people do you think read this? I'm just guessing, but I'd say zero.
a) I adapt to perceivable inspiration for the growth of my comprehension. I utilize others as perceivable inspiration (moving differences). I don't write for others; but in response to origin; which grows me within it. The suggestions of others tempt one to spend resistance among them.
b) all represents one in energy, so it ain't about how many; but about how often one chooses to adapt (frequency of resistance).
c) 0 (zero) represents a suggested state (fiction) to tempt one to ignore perceivable oneness (reality). Reality moves; suggested fiction tempts one to hold onto something.
d) what's more beneficial for the sustenance of self...expressing growth or falling for the temptation to wait for how others respond to ones attempted growth?
Have you noticed that there's no growth in writing for others; only ongoing loss...that all the great works of literature can be effortlessly corrupted...that whatever words one suggested into the system of perceivable sound represents a mere burned offering? Just like the allegory of the Library of Alexandria so are modern libraries being burned to the ground by trans-mutation.
Worst bot ever
Implies a self imposed viewpoint of stagnation; while ignoring the moving system required to impose views.