Sure we can agree that mass immigration is a problem and the nation is dying. But I'm going to push back on over the top scapegoating when I know better. Especially since I am one of those brown people but I'm certainly not net negative $500+K in productivity nor do I think the average brown person actually is (in real terms).
The publications provided don't prove anything about a financial collapse. That was a leap of logic based on personal racial bias and a need to scapegoat "the other".
So I don't have to go through and debunk them. Also it stands to reason that people coming into the economy and being hired preferentially by employers would not be performing less productively than their counterparts (otherwise they won't get hired).
There must be a net benefit, and looking at individual income taxes alone does not factor that in. Taxes are also paid on corporate profits, on employees behalf for part of payroll taxes, and on capital gains. Not to mention the potential savings if companies can lower prices when hiring cheaper labor.
Socialists just need to learn true economics, once you do that you won't be any kind of socialist anymore (that includes national socialist).
Sure we can agree that mass immigration is a problem and the nation is dying. But I'm going to push back on over the top scapegoating when I know better. Especially since I am one of those brown people but I'm certainly not net negative $500+K in productivity nor do I think the average brown person actually is (in real terms).
I'm not, I hate paying taxes to feds (aka parasites). The best way to contribute is private enterprise, not taxation.
Take all the evidence you have to counter the publications provided in the picture and publish all of your data.
Let the marketplace of ideas decide. How about that?
The publications provided don't prove anything about a financial collapse. That was a leap of logic based on personal racial bias and a need to scapegoat "the other".
So I don't have to go through and debunk them. Also it stands to reason that people coming into the economy and being hired preferentially by employers would not be performing less productively than their counterparts (otherwise they won't get hired).
There must be a net benefit, and looking at individual income taxes alone does not factor that in. Taxes are also paid on corporate profits, on employees behalf for part of payroll taxes, and on capital gains. Not to mention the potential savings if companies can lower prices when hiring cheaper labor.
Socialists just need to learn true economics, once you do that you won't be any kind of socialist anymore (that includes national socialist).
You’re likely talking to a single operator whose creating the illusion of debate.
Zap is a fed dipshit larping his ass off.
Wouldn't surprise me.