That isn't what happened in Argentina or Venezuela. Not to mention the trends in the US economy are often related to inflationary pressures, and government regs or handouts.
The areas of the economy causing people the most pain: housing, education, healthcare costs, general inflation have 0 to do with immigration and everything to do with government monetary and regulatory policy.
I don't argue that immigration has 0 impact in anything, but it's clear where the real economic problems are coming from.
Sure we can agree that mass immigration is a problem and the nation is dying. But I'm going to push back on over the top scapegoating when I know better. Especially since I am one of those brown people but I'm certainly not net negative $500+K in productivity nor do I think the average brown person actually is (in real terms).
The publications provided don't prove anything about a financial collapse. That was a leap of logic based on personal racial bias and a need to scapegoat "the other".
So I don't have to go through and debunk them. Also it stands to reason that people coming into the economy and being hired preferentially by employers would not be performing less productively than their counterparts (otherwise they won't get hired).
There must be a net benefit, and looking at individual income taxes alone does not factor that in. Taxes are also paid on corporate profits, on employees behalf for part of payroll taxes, and on capital gains. Not to mention the potential savings if companies can lower prices when hiring cheaper labor.
Socialists just need to learn true economics, once you do that you won't be any kind of socialist anymore (that includes national socialist).
The initial argument is that "one of the primary reasons for the financial system collapse" is non-whites.
I cited Argentina one of the most economically screwed South American countries due to government action, but they can't scapegoat a minority group for it. Do you know nothing about Argentina's hyperinflation?
That isn't what happened in Argentina or Venezuela. Not to mention the trends in the US economy are often related to inflationary pressures, and government regs or handouts.
The areas of the economy causing people the most pain: housing, education, healthcare costs, general inflation have 0 to do with immigration and everything to do with government monetary and regulatory policy.
I don't argue that immigration has 0 impact in anything, but it's clear where the real economic problems are coming from.
Sure we can agree that mass immigration is a problem and the nation is dying. But I'm going to push back on over the top scapegoating when I know better. Especially since I am one of those brown people but I'm certainly not net negative $500+K in productivity nor do I think the average brown person actually is (in real terms).
I'm not, I hate paying taxes to feds (aka parasites). The best way to contribute is private enterprise, not taxation.
Take all the evidence you have to counter the publications provided in the picture and publish all of your data.
Let the marketplace of ideas decide. How about that?
The publications provided don't prove anything about a financial collapse. That was a leap of logic based on personal racial bias and a need to scapegoat "the other".
So I don't have to go through and debunk them. Also it stands to reason that people coming into the economy and being hired preferentially by employers would not be performing less productively than their counterparts (otherwise they won't get hired).
There must be a net benefit, and looking at individual income taxes alone does not factor that in. Taxes are also paid on corporate profits, on employees behalf for part of payroll taxes, and on capital gains. Not to mention the potential savings if companies can lower prices when hiring cheaper labor.
Socialists just need to learn true economics, once you do that you won't be any kind of socialist anymore (that includes national socialist).
Argentina, one of the most European cultures in South America. That is your counter example to “non-whites are a net tax burden in the US”?
The initial argument is that "one of the primary reasons for the financial system collapse" is non-whites.
I cited Argentina one of the most economically screwed South American countries due to government action, but they can't scapegoat a minority group for it. Do you know nothing about Argentina's hyperinflation?