Judaism is "closed" religion, only for Jews. Goyim religions should be destroyed and replaced with what you describe - thing for controlling people.
Nearly every religion was rewritten and many things "occasionally" lost in translation. Simple and easy verifiable Bible example - "there is no authority which is not of God, and all authorities are ordered by God.". That is a lie. If you take any ancient text and literally translate that phrase you will inevitably get "Not an authorities if not from God, real authorities can be from God only":
"there is no authority which is not of God, and all authorities are ordered by God." [translates to] "Not an authorities if not from God, real authorities can be from God only"
Religion is a theory of existence. Theories are for those who want to know how things works. Just like conspiracy theories. Weakness have nothing to do with theories.
RELIGON (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies theorizing about what others are suggesting about existence; while being bound to their suggested definitions. This tempts one to ignore that existence aka to be implies out of; hence in response to perceivable origin...not to suggested substitutes.
want to know
What if...need to respond to knowledge (perceivable inspiration); while resisting the temptation to want to ignore it for suggested information by others?
how things work
EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Weakness have nothing to do with theories.
How is suggested "nothing" not a weakness for those theorizing about perceivable everything?
Judaism is "closed" religion, only for Jews. Goyim religions should be destroyed and replaced with what you describe - thing for controlling people.
Nearly every religion was rewritten and many things "occasionally" lost in translation. Simple and easy verifiable Bible example - "there is no authority which is not of God, and all authorities are ordered by God.". That is a lie. If you take any ancient text and literally translate that phrase you will inevitably get "Not an authorities if not from God, real authorities can be from God only":
Greek original: "οὐ γὰρ ἔστιν ἐξουσία εἰ μὴ ὑπὸ Θεοῦ, αἱ δὲ οὖσαι ὑπὸ Θεοῦ τεταγμέναι εἰσίν."
Ancient Latin: "non est enim potestas nisi a Deo guae autem sunt a Deo ordinatae sunt"
Ancient Russian: "несть бо власть аще не от Бога, сущия же власти от Бога учинены суть"
Check it, it is not that hard. There are tons of such things. That is control you talk about, and it have nothing common with initial goyim religion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmEScIUcvz0&t=4363s
How are the two phrases any different?
"Any authority is from God" vs "Not an authority if not from God". Are you really need some explanations?
No. I need to think clearly before commenting.
Religion is a theory of existence. Theories are for those who want to know how things works. Just like conspiracy theories. Weakness have nothing to do with theories.
You mix religion with cult.
RELIGON (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies theorizing about what others are suggesting about existence; while being bound to their suggested definitions. This tempts one to ignore that existence aka to be implies out of; hence in response to perceivable origin...not to suggested substitutes.
What if...need to respond to knowledge (perceivable inspiration); while resisting the temptation to want to ignore it for suggested information by others?
EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
How is suggested "nothing" not a weakness for those theorizing about perceivable everything?