The Fabian Society
(www.omegatimes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
They are above the law. No national laws governs them, but their own. They are a country, within a country. Not answering to local government. Perhaps the Monarchy? Although they probably don't even care. Because their's is a particularly special contract with the Crown granting them extraordinary circumstances. It goes back for centuries. Today, it goes beyond simple borders, and they'd as easily set up shop in another profitable venture. If it weren't for the protections afforded. It's not the Fabian society, I refer too. But their backers/financiers mentioned.
Questionably could Congress hold the FED treasonous. Whoops what went wrong? Does not compute, collapse. And if it got a bright idea, I know I know, we will make the people's bank of our own national reserve, there's another assassination?
The few suggest the laws of men aka the rules of behavior for the many who consent to submit to the suggested.
Everyone exists within the laws of nature; as the ones perceiving within all perceivable, as choice (free will) within balance (need/want); as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); as temporary resistance (living) within the ongoing natural order of velocity (dying).
The many ignore to grow within perceivable; hence lowering themselves underneath the suggestions of the few; who parasitically exploit mass ignorance with suggestion, as the merchants of temptation, utilizing choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law.
They are literally above the law almost on the same scale of the Queen is exempt from prosecution. But not quite.
Seriously they stone wall. Sure they might provide a scapegoat, if it hits the fan. But they're practically exempt. Unless they commit cold blooded murder or some other national violation. But when it comes to anything else mundane, not a chance.
I think it goes back to the Norman conquest of London. They struck a deal as the rest of London was invaded. To this day they remain quite sovereign.
Huge thing about it, not many know of it. Most have seen it. The London mile. They have their own mayor, police force, and territory. Research it, instead of providing definitions. It's similar to the Vatican. But this is banks, and corporate investment, tax havens, and heaps of proxies.
Conspiracies abound. Yea it's a documentary in any event.
When you say it like that you imply your belief in "the law" above us and them. That law was suggested by the few and consented to by the belief of the many.
Ask yourself why "they" can use their free will of choice to stand above "the law" if the law governs us and them? What if choice is bound to a different law...to natural law?
Ask yourself why you want to PROS'ECUTE, verb - "to follow or pursue with a view to reach" when living implies resisting outcome (dying)?
KING (sovereign) + QUEEN (consort of sovereign)...what if those represent enacting balance and reacting choice?
And yet the lives of us and them are being moved from inception towards death, no matter how many stone walls the masons of free will are putting up within the minds of the many.
Try to resist the temptation of suggested restrictions and question the ongoing, perceivable system underneath. The use suggestion to tempt the many to ignore the perceivable system and the more the perceivable is ignored; the less power (resistance) the perceiving have within.
Your consent to suggested moralism is what allows the few to shape "sin" within your head, which only then allows further suggestion of a scapegoat to shirk response-ability (choice) onto.
There's no such thing as forgiveness within a moving system...those within shape as responding choice, on the fly, the consequences of their choices.
The anticipation of outcomes is based on the many consenting to the suggested "progressivism" by the few. Life isn't outcome oriented (dying); but resistance to origin for sustenance of self (living).
Have you ever committed cold blooded murder? Turns out very few have; yet so many blame others for doing it. What about self destruction? Turns out many do; yet so few reflect upon self for doing it.
NATION; noun - "a people". Is there any nation that is controlled by its people instead of so called representatives? Isn't the biggest national violation the ignorance of being one of "a people"; hence already partially representing the whole nation?
CHANCE; noun - "the effect of an unknown cause"...how then could the perceiving ones exist within all perceivable as the effect of the cause?
Also; if the perceiving ones exist within everything perceivable...where does "nothing" comes from? Could it be a suggestion by others.
The so called "Crown Corporation" represents the corpus oration (whisper of the death) of the ornament (crown) aka the ORNA (from adorn - "to set off to advantage") MENT (from mens; mind; memory).
The state of nations within nations represent the suggestion of others within your consenting mind.
LONDON aka LONE (alone; solitary one) DONE (performed; expressed) represents "alone" ALL (perceiving) within ONE (perceivable) as form (life) expressed within flow (inception towards death).
Been there; done that. Digging into suggested information doesn't grow ones comprehension within perceivable inspiration; it buries it down the "rabbit-hole"; while spending resistance seeking information from others.
As for providing definitions...I try to take the provided (suggested) definitions apart; while try to express the predefined; perceivable inspiration this system communicates itself with. Nature doesn't provide one defined word; it offers predefined sound towards responding choice to resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
VATICAN; noun (Latin vates; seer) - "fore-teller" aka one who suggest that which isn't to tempt others to ignore resisting that which is. The temporary living within the ongoing process of dying can only foretell death.
Yawn yawn yawn. I don't need definitions here. I submitted something. I understand it. I am not sure you do when expressing all of that. But thanks for your efforts. They aren't wasted.
Although how they affect the country is quite hidden from it. But obviously has a larger role in it. On the outside they're another corporation, or HQ of corporations. But that is veiled in quite a secretive state. Laws, Mayor, Police Force, Security arrangements. What it means is quite the guess you're providing. I suggest watching some documentaries about it.
You're breaking down what I have causally implied, but I am laymen. I know of them watched some opinions controversial and pro. It means nothing more or less.
But I forwarded a comparative argument. Could the FED be held treasonous, in response to another claim. Hahaha. Only a lynch mob would disagree, and at that point what has happened?